Asia Europe Journal最新文献_第7页

The impact of the Japan-European Union Economic Partnership Agreement on the trade and income of Japan, the European Union, and South Korea 《日本-欧盟经济伙伴关系协定》对日本、欧盟和韩国贸易和收入的影响

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-022-00646-6

Chae-Deug Yi

引用次数: 0

CAI: China is ready, how is about Europe 蔡:中国已经准备好了，欧洲呢

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00642-2

Xin Chen

引用次数: 1

A French perspective on the China-EU comprehensive agreement on investment: the proof of the pudding is in the eating 法国人对中欧全面投资协定的看法:布丁是吃的，布丁是吃的

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00634-2

Françoise Nicolas

引用次数: 2

Understanding China’s changing engagement in global climate governance: a struggle for identity 理解中国参与全球气候治理的变化:一场身份之争

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00643-1

Jilong Yang

{"title":"Understanding China’s changing engagement in global climate governance: a struggle for identity","authors":"Jilong Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10308-021-00643-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10308-021-00643-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article offers a novel understanding of China’s changing engagement in global climate governance over the past decade. This article argues that China has embedded the construction of its international identity, which has been transforming towards what this article conceptualizes to be a ‘Yinling leading power’, in promoting and leading global climate governance. China’s transforming identity construction has contributed to changing its construction of climate justice and led China to proactively undertake more responsibilities, provide international public goods and promote international climate cooperation. Global climate governance has become one of China’s prototypical discursive frames in constructing its new international identity, an important platform where China seeks to share leadership with other major powers and the climate leadership in turn constitutes China’s new identity. However, China’s inadequate response to international expectations and lack of self-reflection in its climate policy have influenced international recognition on its climate leadership and new identity. In general, China’s transforming identity construction and its reconstruction of climate justice have far-reaching implications for China and Europe to cooperate and coordinate in strengthening global climate justice and promoting global climate governance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"357 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-021-00643-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39826423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Financing climate justice in the European Union and China: common mechanisms, different perspectives 欧盟和中国的气候正义融资:共同机制，不同视角

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-04 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00644-0

Stephen Minas

{"title":"Financing climate justice in the European Union and China: common mechanisms, different perspectives","authors":"Stephen Minas","doi":"10.1007/s10308-021-00644-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10308-021-00644-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate justice is a concept with many different and competing interpretations. It has salience at intra-country, inter-country and intergenerational levels of climate politics. While inter-country climate justice has long been on the agenda of United Nations climate negotiations, the intra-country and intergenerational aspects of climate justice have assumed new prominence in many countries in recent years, as the economic consequences of mitigation became felt and transnational activism highlighted youth concerns. The diverse elements of and approaches to climate justice have this in common: realising them requires massive financial interventions and reforms. This article examines the still emerging frameworks to finance climate justice in two of the jurisdictions most important to the global response to climate change: the European Union and the People’s Republic of China. The EU and China have in common that they are both on the front line of financial innovation to respond to climate change. They are utilising similar tools of systemic financial intervention in order to transition financing to climate-friendly investment, in the first case domestically, but with clear implications for global financial markets. However, the EU and China are utilising climate financing mechanisms in the context of very different prevailing perspectives on climate justice. This article interrogates the relationship between these different perspectives on climate justice and the distribution, scale and pace of climate finance. The article also observes that while the EU incorporated climate justice considerations in its economic responses to the COVID-19 pandemic with a recovery package prioritising climate action, China did not take the opportunity to foster a ‘green recovery’.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"377 - 401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-021-00644-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39718313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Worsening British views of China in 2020: evidence from public opinion, parliament, and the media 2020年英国对华看法恶化:来自公众舆论、议会和媒体的证据

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00639-x

Tim Summers, Hiu Man Chan, Peter Gries, Richard Turcsanyi

引用次数: 1

How and why European and Chinese pro-climate leadership may be challenged by their strategic economic interests in Brazil 欧洲和中国支持气候变化的领导地位如何以及为什么会受到他们在巴西的战略经济利益的挑战

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00645-z

Carlos R. S. Milani, Leonildes Nazar Chaves

{"title":"How and why European and Chinese pro-climate leadership may be challenged by their strategic economic interests in Brazil","authors":"Carlos R. S. Milani, Leonildes Nazar Chaves","doi":"10.1007/s10308-021-00645-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10308-021-00645-z","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change has been socially constructed crisscrossed by public and private interests, asymmetries and world-view conflicts. When it comes to the legitimacy of norms to address the complexities of social conditions of vulnerability and effective actions to fulfil distributive and climate justice principles, climate change still faces a discrepancy between political announcements and incongruous practices of international actors. While analysing the cases of China and the European Union, we point out contradictions stemming from their policy goals guided by strategic interests. From a global climate justice perspective, we analyze recent power dynamics that operate at two levels: first, economic relations and negotiations between Brazil and the two poles of power, considering the scenario of socio-environmental injustice and climate insecurity; second, policy practices of both global players in climate governance, bearing in mind the notions of climate justice and development as conceptual guides to understand when and where contradictions emerge. To do so, this article is structured around three sections: (i) a brief historical account of China’s and the EU’s roles in international climate policy; (ii) their legacies in climate governance and the inextricable relationship between their normative behaviour and their development objectives; (iii) an overview of the signing of the strategic memorandum of understanding for economic and trade agreement between Mercosur and the EU in 2019, as well as Sino-Brazilian relations facilitating investments and trade in multiple segments vis-à-vis the most recent multifaceted backlash in Brazil’s socio-environmental and climate policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"403 - 422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-021-00645-z.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39783180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Assessing the pros and cons of the EU-China comprehensive agreement on investment: an introduction to the special issue 评估中欧投资全面协议的利弊：特刊简介

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00641-3

Nicola Casarini, Miguel Otero-Iglesias

引用次数: 1

Poland’s stance on CAI: no need for haste 波兰在CAI问题上的立场是:没有必要操之过急

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00635-1

Justyna Szczudlik

引用次数: 0

Analysing the EU’s collective securitisation moves towards China 分析欧盟集体证券化对中国的影响

IF 1.6 3区社会学

Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4

Xuechen Chen, Xinchuchu Gao

{"title":"Analysing the EU’s collective securitisation moves towards China","authors":"Xuechen Chen, Xinchuchu Gao","doi":"10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research responds to an increasing volume of scholarly literature unpacking the recent dynamics of EU foreign policy discourses and practices vis-à-vis China. Drawing on the theoretical approach of collective securitisation, this article shows that EU foreign policy towards China since the mid-2010s has witnessed increasing collective securitisation moves directed at multiple policy frames, including Asian regional security frame, economic security frame, political security frame and information and technology and cybersecurity frame. The EU’s attempts to securitise China as an existential threat across multiple issue areas have been triggered by a combination of long-term trends and specific sets of precipitating events, which contributed to galvanising the EU’s collective securitising discourses and subsequent policy initiatives. However, this research finds that the EU’s securitising moves and relevant speech acts have not resulted in a coherent audience response among the EU member states. The divergent views held by the EU’s internal audience on whether China should be perceived as an existential threat have hampered the implementation of the EU’s collective policy outputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 2","pages":"195 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-021-00640-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39537832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3