JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW最新文献_第4页

Off the menu? should care orders at home only be made in exceptionally rare circumstances? 从菜单上撤下?是否只有在非常罕见的情况下才需要家庭护理?

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2281842

Judith Masson

引用次数: 0

Revoking parental responsibility – or not 撤销父母的责任——或者不

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-11-12 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2282263

Rob George

引用次数: 0

Domestic abuse and child contact in Scotland: the perspectives of family law practitioners 苏格兰的家庭虐待和儿童接触:家庭法律从业人员的观点

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243147

Michele Burman, Ruth Friskney, Jane Mair, Richard Whitecross

引用次数: 0

Ombudsman, Tribunals and Administrative Justice in the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 《社会福利和家庭法杂志》上的监察员、法庭和行政司法

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243149

Lee Marsons

{"title":"Ombudsman, Tribunals and Administrative Justice in the Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law","authors":"Lee Marsons","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2023.2243149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2243149","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This editorial introduces the new editor of the Journal’s Ombudsman, Tribunals and Administrative Justice section; highlights the editorial team’s four strategic priorities for the section; and identifies four research priorities which the editorial team wishes to promote. For strategic priorities, the first is developing ‘applied administrative justice’ scholarship consciously directed at resolving practical administrative justice problems. Second is growing the connections between the Journal and civil society organisations, including those working on the frontline with individuals and communities most exposed to, and dependent on, public bodies. Third is expanding the interdisciplinary reach and content of the section, particularly to mental health and accounting. Fourth is encouraging early career researchers to become more involved in the section. As to research priorities, the editorial team identifies four themes: money and administrative justice, encouraging researchers to grapple with the financial benefits of their proposals and the effectiveness of different funding mechanisms; mental health and administrative justice, particularly through engaging with the fields of ”therapeutic jurisprudence” and ”law and emotion”; new technologies and administrative justice, particularly how virtual delivery changes experiences of public bodies; and hybridity and administrative justice, examining the complicated range of publics, privates, and charitables involved in modern public service delivery.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43595952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Whose procedural fairness? 谁的程序公平？

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243150

J. Tomlinson, Eleana Kasoulide, J. Meers, S. Halliday

引用次数: 0

Mother today, stranger tomorrow? 今天是妈妈，明天是陌生人?

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243153

Zaina Mahmoud

引用次数: 0

Public inquiries: irreconcilable interests and the importance of managing expectations 公众质询:不可调和的利益和管理期望的重要性

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-13 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243137

Emma Ireton

{"title":"Public inquiries: irreconcilable interests and the importance of managing expectations","authors":"Emma Ireton","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2023.2243137","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2243137","url":null,"abstract":"Public inquiries address serious matters of public concern, including those affecting the most vulnerable and marginalised in society. There are ongoing, heated debates about how inquiries should be set up and run and who primarily should be served by a public inquiry. However, these debates must be judged in the context of an accurate understanding of their role and function. This article explores the source of misplaced expectations of the process, leading to frustration and distress for participants and delays, which can seriously undermine participant and public confidence. It argues that, even where the public inquiry process is well understood, conflicting interests and expectations arise because of the different capacities in which people engage with a public inquiry, which are often difficult or impossible to resolve. The article examines evidence of how this has led to frequent challenges about the setting up and running of public inquiries and considers judicial decisions on the decision-making process. It recognises limitations to the public inquiry process, which cannot always deliver the outcomes and resolution sought by participants and the public. It identifies the need for clearer articulation of the role and function of a public inquiry and more effective management of expectations.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45088436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial 编辑

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243135

Mavis Maclean

引用次数: 0

Smoke and mirrors? Regulation 12 and access to legal aid for victims of domestic abuse 烟雾和镜子?第12条条例和家庭虐待受害者获得法律援助的机会

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243148

Kayliegh Richardson, A. Speed

{"title":"Smoke and mirrors? Regulation 12 and access to legal aid for victims of domestic abuse","authors":"Kayliegh Richardson, A. Speed","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2023.2243148","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2243148","url":null,"abstract":"Since the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 was introduced the number of unrepresented victims of domestic abuse in applications for protective injunctions, has increased. Studies consistently point to the strict legal aid means criteria as the reason behind this, however, there is a paucity of literature challenging why this is the case, given that provision is made within Regulation 12 of the Civil Legal Aid (Financial Resources and Payment for Services) Regulations 2013 for the financial eligibility thresholds to be waived in applications for a protective order. Drawing on a survey of 24 legal professionals and information provided by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) following Freedom of Information Act requests, this article seeks to address this gap in the literature and examine the value of Regulation 12. Findings indicate that the limited use of Regulation 12 can be attributed to a weak understanding amongst legal aid practitioners about its existence, concerns amongst practitioners about not being remunerated for work completed on files and an absence of clear guidance for the Director as to the use of the discretion. The findings are timely as the means test being considered by the ongoing Legal Aid Review.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47624007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Section 48 orders in the Court of Protection: undermining autonomy or an honest account of interim judging? 保护法院的第48条命令:破坏自治还是对临时判决的诚实陈述?

IF 1.5

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152

Jaime Lindsey

引用次数: 0