保护法院的第48条命令:破坏自治还是对临时判决的诚实陈述?

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152

Jaime Lindsey

{"title":"保护法院的第48条命令:破坏自治还是对临时判决的诚实陈述?","authors":"Jaime Lindsey","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This case note considers the role of section 48 orders under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 following the decision by Mostyn J in A Local Authority v LD and RD [2023] EWHC 1258 (Fam). The case concerned an application for removal from home for a man in his 40s with learning disability, autism and Down’s Syndrome for the purposes of assessment of mental capacity. The case note considers the role and function of interim orders under section 48 as well as the wider problem of removing adults from their own home in the name of safeguarding.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Section 48 orders in the Court of Protection: undermining autonomy or an honest account of interim judging?\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Lindsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This case note considers the role of section 48 orders under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 following the decision by Mostyn J in A Local Authority v LD and RD [2023] EWHC 1258 (Fam). The case concerned an application for removal from home for a man in his 40s with learning disability, autism and Down’s Syndrome for the purposes of assessment of mental capacity. The case note considers the role and function of interim orders under section 48 as well as the wider problem of removing adults from their own home in the name of safeguarding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2023.2243152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Section 48 orders in the Court of Protection: undermining autonomy or an honest account of interim judging?

ABSTRACT This case note considers the role of section 48 orders under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 following the decision by Mostyn J in A Local Authority v LD and RD [2023] EWHC 1258 (Fam). The case concerned an application for removal from home for a man in his 40s with learning disability, autism and Down’s Syndrome for the purposes of assessment of mental capacity. The case note considers the role and function of interim orders under section 48 as well as the wider problem of removing adults from their own home in the name of safeguarding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW LAW-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law is concerned with social and family law and policy in a UK, European and international context. The policy of the Editors and of the Editorial Board is to provide an interdisciplinary forum to which academics and professionals working in the social welfare and related fields may turn for guidance, comment and informed debate. Features: •Articles •Cases •European Section •Current Development •Ombudsman"s Section •Book Reviews