I. Luffman, T. Joyner, William C. Tollefson, Abbey K. Mann, M. Quinn, Stefan M. Pienkowski
{"title":"Rurality and COVID-19 in Tennessee: Assessing and Communicating Pandemic Emergence and Transmission","authors":"I. Luffman, T. Joyner, William C. Tollefson, Abbey K. Mann, M. Quinn, Stefan M. Pienkowski","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0016","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The first reported case of COVID-19 in Tennessee (TN) occurred on March 5, 2020, growing to 580,809 cases state-wide by the end of 2020. A GIS dashboard was developed using data from the TN Department of Health to communicate state-wide COVID-19 spread, and a relationship between pandemic development and rurality was observed during the first wave (through September 2020), noted in other US and global research. Because > 90% of TN counties are designated rural or mixed-rural, we examined metrics to describe development as it relates to rurality. Metrics included days to the first case/hospitalization/fatality, days between state and county peak, and days to an incidence rate of ten per 100,000. Metrics were compared within different classes of rurality, using seven rurality classification schemes. Significant differences were noted in four of the five metrics between classes of rurality. Rural counties in TN experienced significant lags to the first case, hospitalization, and fatality, and the peak cases in rural counties were delayed relative to urban counties when outlier counties with early state prison outbreaks were excluded. In rural TN counties, regardless of rurality definition, cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities were slower to appear. However, once community spread was established, rurality no longer had a protective effect.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"203 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43049116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Multi-Century Fire History from the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia","authors":"Thomas Saladyga, R. S. Maxwell","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0019","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Tree-ring reconstructions of past fire activity provide context for forest management and restoration plans. Our primary objective in this study was to develop a new fire history in the Potomac Highlands of West Virginia where published reconstructions are particularly sparse, but efforts to develop prescribed fire plans are on the rise. We produced a 293-year (1727–2019) post-settlement fire history from 57 yellow pine (P. pungens, P. rigida, and P. virginiana) trees spread across five topographically diverse sites on Short Mountain in Hampshire County. The filtered composite mean fire interval was 7–15 years at individual sites, while a landscape-scale analysis indicates that fire frequency did not change over nearly 160 years (1855–2011). Fires, however, were significantly less extensive during the \"exclusion era\" (post-1930). No conclusive relationships between drought and fire were identified, although the most extensive fire year (1930) was uniquely dry. These findings complement existing regional fire histories and provide a new context for the application of prescribed fire in the Potomac Highlands.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"258 - 278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48336511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell
{"title":"Introduction from the Editorial Team","authors":"Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0015","url":null,"abstract":"[...]one such article in this issue details the effects of rurality in Tennessee relating to the spread of COVID-19. [...]this approach can better describe uncertainty within spatial data, particularly where spatial autocorrelation is present. [...]when Northerners visit such places, they are \"infected\" by the Lost Cause and carry it with them North and to their social circles. Since most of the Confederate monuments are in the South, Klein argues that the monuments themselves are not enough to explain this diffusion - without the Northern visitors (who serve as hosts), the Lost Cause mythology could not spread beyond the South.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"200 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46136481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What is a “Green City”? Understanding Environmental Imaginaries of Residents in a Politically Conservative Area","authors":"Maya Henderson, M. Lawhon","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>highlights:</p><p><list list-type=\"bullet\"><list-item><label>•</label><p>Participants largely favored environmental action and believed environmentalism is important.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>They suggested that their style and scale of living was more green and more desirable than large, dense urban areas.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>The size of the urban area, sense of community, and connection to the land were central to their green imaginary.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Participants identified the community as the key driver of the change, emphasizing individualized and performative actions.</p></list-item></list></p><p>abstract:</p><p>Contemporary mainstream accounts of sustainability in the United States increasingly emphasize the importance of large, dense urban areas and nature within the metropolis, a hybrid that brings the “green” into the urban. Here, we demonstrate that many people believe neither that such areas are greener nor that these are desirable places to live. Through brief photo elicitation interviews and a focus group, we examine the imaginary of “green city” in a politically conservative area. Our findings suggest residents do support environmentalism, and believe their local area embodies much of what it means to be “green”, including a strong sense of community, a lifestyle deeply connected to the local environment, and a desire to take part in sustainability initiatives. Big cities, in contrast, are imagined as both less green and less desirable places to live. We suggest that the dominant US American urban environmental imaginary remains alienating to many and reflect on the implications of these divergent imaginaries for environmental politics. Emphasizing the multiplicity of environmental imaginaries helps us to understand conservative areas not necessarily as anti-environmental but as articulating views that do not accord with dominant perspectives; this might also point us towards more diverse possibilities for sustainable futures.</p>","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"175 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SGO.2021.0012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44334026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Challenges and Opportunities in the Transition of Plantation Museums from Erasing to Narrating Slavery","authors":"Doron Eldar, David Jansson","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>highlights:</p><p><list list-type=\"bullet\"><list-item><label>•</label><p>An increasing number of plantation museums are transitioning away from whitewashing slavery to interpreting it.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Transitioning plantation museums’ access to a traditional visitor base provides educational opportunities.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>To successfully transition, plantation museums must take into account a range of considerations.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Key considerations are narrators’ epistemic positionality and capacity to guide visitors through discomfort.</p></list-item></list></p><p>abstract:</p><p>Against the backdrop of increasing public scrutiny, a growing number of plantation museums seek to transition their historical interpretation from erasing slavery to narrating it. Due to these sites’ access to their “pre-transition” visitor base, they are uniquely positioned to “call in” visitors who tend to avoid the facts of slavery. Nonetheless, we argue that for these sites to be truly transformative, they must account for a range of factors. These include the role of epistemic self-reflection in narrative construction (to help avoid the reproduction of white innocence), and the ability to guide visitors through the discomfort generated by the new narrative (to prevent backlash and to keep visitors open to the narrative’s message). To make this argument we examine the case of the Oak Alley plantation in Vacherie, Louisiana, and offer brief instructive comparisons to Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello plantation in Virginia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"111 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SGO.2021.0009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45202187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell
{"title":"Introduction from the Editorial Team","authors":"Selima Sultana, P. Knapp, Ridwaana Allen, T. Mitchell","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"107 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SGO.2021.0008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43431896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Experiences and Perceptions of Receptivity among Latinos and non-Latinos in the US Southeast: Lessons from Community Dialogues in an Evolving Immigrant Gateway City","authors":"J. Schuch, Heather A. Smith, Susan B. Harden","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>highlights:</p><p><list list-type=\"bullet\"><list-item><label>•</label><p>Receptivity plays out at different scales and most places are characterized by mixed receptivity.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Race/ethnicity is not necessarily a predictor of receptive behavior.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Receptivity is, for the most part, experienced differently amongst Latinos and non-Latinos.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Documentation status is a recurring barrier to positive receptivity.</p></list-item><list-item><label>•</label><p>Individuals and institutions seek guidance in making places more receptive to Latinos.</p></list-item></list></p><p>abstract:</p><p>Given the charged political climate around Latino immigration, understanding receptivity dynamics is critical for leaders in Southern cities experiencing growing Latino communities. Throughout 2016, 863 residents of Charlotte, North Carolina visited a museum exhibit and participated in a community dialogue program about Latinos in the “New South.” Drawing on survey data and participant observations collected from these individuals, this paper investigates what Latino and non-Latino participants’ comments tell us about individual and institutional receptivity landscapes. While Latinos and non-Latinos shared concerns about stereotyping and prejudice, receptivity is often experienced and understood differently amongst Latinos and non-Latinos. Still, immigration status and race/ethnicity are not necessarily predictors of receptive behavior. Receptivity plays out at different scales; people can perceive themselves as receptive and, at the same time, perceive institutions as unwelcoming or having mixed receptivity. Within this, documentation status is a recurring barrier to receptivity. Since receptivity is malleable, intentional initiatives and spaces created with Latinos can help Latinos feel more welcomed. Charlotte and the South can be more receptive by suggesting specific individual actions, ensuring our institutions reflect the populations they serve, and building Latino and non-Latino alliances. Our findings further the understanding of how to conceptualize, measure, and shape receptivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"146 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46233589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unstated Flag in Mississippi","authors":"Caleb Smith","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"105 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SGO.2021.0007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45397807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Battle of Negro Fort: The Rise and Fall of a Fugitive Slave Community by Matthew J. Clavin (review)","authors":"Tyler McCreary","doi":"10.1353/SGO.2021.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SGO.2021.0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"193 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/SGO.2021.0013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49356957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}