田纳西州的农村和COVID-19:评估和沟通大流行的出现和传播

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
I. Luffman, T. Joyner, William C. Tollefson, Abbey K. Mann, M. Quinn, Stefan M. Pienkowski
{"title":"田纳西州的农村和COVID-19:评估和沟通大流行的出现和传播","authors":"I. Luffman, T. Joyner, William C. Tollefson, Abbey K. Mann, M. Quinn, Stefan M. Pienkowski","doi":"10.1353/sgo.2021.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The first reported case of COVID-19 in Tennessee (TN) occurred on March 5, 2020, growing to 580,809 cases state-wide by the end of 2020. A GIS dashboard was developed using data from the TN Department of Health to communicate state-wide COVID-19 spread, and a relationship between pandemic development and rurality was observed during the first wave (through September 2020), noted in other US and global research. Because > 90% of TN counties are designated rural or mixed-rural, we examined metrics to describe development as it relates to rurality. Metrics included days to the first case/hospitalization/fatality, days between state and county peak, and days to an incidence rate of ten per 100,000. Metrics were compared within different classes of rurality, using seven rurality classification schemes. Significant differences were noted in four of the five metrics between classes of rurality. Rural counties in TN experienced significant lags to the first case, hospitalization, and fatality, and the peak cases in rural counties were delayed relative to urban counties when outlier counties with early state prison outbreaks were excluded. In rural TN counties, regardless of rurality definition, cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities were slower to appear. However, once community spread was established, rurality no longer had a protective effect.","PeriodicalId":45528,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Geographer","volume":"61 1","pages":"203 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rurality and COVID-19 in Tennessee: Assessing and Communicating Pandemic Emergence and Transmission\",\"authors\":\"I. Luffman, T. Joyner, William C. Tollefson, Abbey K. Mann, M. Quinn, Stefan M. Pienkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sgo.2021.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The first reported case of COVID-19 in Tennessee (TN) occurred on March 5, 2020, growing to 580,809 cases state-wide by the end of 2020. A GIS dashboard was developed using data from the TN Department of Health to communicate state-wide COVID-19 spread, and a relationship between pandemic development and rurality was observed during the first wave (through September 2020), noted in other US and global research. Because > 90% of TN counties are designated rural or mixed-rural, we examined metrics to describe development as it relates to rurality. Metrics included days to the first case/hospitalization/fatality, days between state and county peak, and days to an incidence rate of ten per 100,000. Metrics were compared within different classes of rurality, using seven rurality classification schemes. Significant differences were noted in four of the five metrics between classes of rurality. Rural counties in TN experienced significant lags to the first case, hospitalization, and fatality, and the peak cases in rural counties were delayed relative to urban counties when outlier counties with early state prison outbreaks were excluded. In rural TN counties, regardless of rurality definition, cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities were slower to appear. However, once community spread was established, rurality no longer had a protective effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southeastern Geographer\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"203 - 221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southeastern Geographer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Geographer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sgo.2021.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

田纳西州(TN)于2020年3月5日报告了第一例COVID-19病例,到2020年底,全州新增病例为580,809例。利用田纳西州卫生部的数据开发了一个GIS仪表板,以传达全州范围内的COVID-19传播情况,并在美国和全球其他研究中指出,在第一波(到2020年9月)期间观察到大流行发展与农村之间的关系。由于田纳西州90%的县被指定为农村或混合农村,我们研究了与农村相关的指标来描述发展。指标包括到第一例病例/住院/死亡的天数,州和县高峰之间的天数,以及到发病率为10万分之十的天数。采用7种乡村性分类方案,对不同乡村性类别的指标进行比较。五项指标中的四项在不同农村阶层之间存在显著差异。泰米尔纳德邦的农村县在第一例病例、住院和病死率方面存在显著滞后,当排除早期发生州监狱疫情的异常县时,农村县的高峰病例相对于城市县有所延迟。在田纳西州农村县,无论农村定义如何,病例、住院和死亡人数的出现都较慢。然而,一旦建立了社区传播,乡村性就不再具有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rurality and COVID-19 in Tennessee: Assessing and Communicating Pandemic Emergence and Transmission
abstract:The first reported case of COVID-19 in Tennessee (TN) occurred on March 5, 2020, growing to 580,809 cases state-wide by the end of 2020. A GIS dashboard was developed using data from the TN Department of Health to communicate state-wide COVID-19 spread, and a relationship between pandemic development and rurality was observed during the first wave (through September 2020), noted in other US and global research. Because > 90% of TN counties are designated rural or mixed-rural, we examined metrics to describe development as it relates to rurality. Metrics included days to the first case/hospitalization/fatality, days between state and county peak, and days to an incidence rate of ten per 100,000. Metrics were compared within different classes of rurality, using seven rurality classification schemes. Significant differences were noted in four of the five metrics between classes of rurality. Rural counties in TN experienced significant lags to the first case, hospitalization, and fatality, and the peak cases in rural counties were delayed relative to urban counties when outlier counties with early state prison outbreaks were excluded. In rural TN counties, regardless of rurality definition, cases, hospitalizations, and fatalities were slower to appear. However, once community spread was established, rurality no longer had a protective effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Southeastern Geographer is a biannual publication of the Southeastern Division of Association of American Geographers. The journal has published the academic work of geographers and other social and physical scientists since 1961. Peer-reviewed articles and essays are published along with book reviews, organization and conference reports, and commentaries. The journal welcomes manuscripts on any geographical subject as long as it reflects sound scholarship and contains significant contributions to geographical understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信