发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Child Custody最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Safe and secure: Suggestions for sharing care of babies and toddlers 安全:分享婴幼儿看护的建议
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1445057
P. Ludolph
{"title":"Safe and secure: Suggestions for sharing care of babies and toddlers","authors":"P. Ludolph","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1445057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1445057","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Infants and toddlers form critical attachments to both their mothers and fathers if the parent is caring and available to the child with regularity. Given that one secure attachment has been shown to promote healthy development in important ways and that it remains unknown at birth which parent will best generate that attachment, it is wise to provide each parent enough time with the child to foster attachment, including children whose parents do not live together. Although babies may be temporarily stressed by the early introduction of an unfamiliar parent, there is little likelihood of lasting harm if there is screening for violence and serious mental illness in parents who are of concern and if the unfamiliar parent is introduced with sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87797583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Does shared parenting by separated parents affect the adjustment of young children? 分居父母共同抚养会影响幼儿的适应吗?
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1425105
M. Lamb
{"title":"Does shared parenting by separated parents affect the adjustment of young children?","authors":"M. Lamb","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1425105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1425105","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The changing family roles and evidence that most infants form attachment relationships with both of their parents have sparked a debate about parenting arrangements when the parents of infants and toddlers separate. Misunderstanding of attachment theory and the available empirical evidence has obscured rather than clarified evidence-based decision-making. In this report, I closely examine the five studies most frequently referenced in this context and show what they do and do not tell us about the ways in which children’s adjustment can be promoted when their parents separate. Consistent with attachment theory, the evidence suggests that children benefit when parenting plans allow them to maintain meaningful and positive relationships with both of their parents.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83020629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Parental gatekeeping forensic model and child custody evaluation: Social capital and application to relocation disputes 父母把关法医模型与子女监护权评估:社会资本及其在搬迁纠纷中的应用
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1431827
William G. Austin, S. Rappaport
{"title":"Parental gatekeeping forensic model and child custody evaluation: Social capital and application to relocation disputes","authors":"William G. Austin, S. Rappaport","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1431827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1431827","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The parental gatekeeping, forensic evaluation model for child custody evaluators and other family court practitioners is presented. Gatekeeping refers to the ability of each parent to support the other parent–child relationships. The gatekeeping concept represents a common best interest statutory factor. Patterns or subtypes of gatekeeping are defined: facilitative, restrictive, and protective. A justification analysis is required when a parent is not supportive and/or restrictive on the other parent’s access to the child. The restrictive parent needs to identify the reasons for being restrictive/protective and show the nature of the harm. Relevant research is reviewed on joint parental involvement and gatekeeping. The gatekeeping model is applied to the context of relocation disputes. Relocation is framed as restrictive gatekeeping and the child custody relocation analysis is presented as a justification analysis in terms of the facts, context, reasons for moving, advantages/disadvantages, and legal factors that need to be assessed and considered.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83246406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Relocation and the indissolubility of parenthood 父母身份的重新定位和不可分割性
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2017.1411858
P. Parkinson, J. Cashmore
{"title":"Relocation and the indissolubility of parenthood","authors":"P. Parkinson, J. Cashmore","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2017.1411858","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1411858","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is based upon the findings of a five-year prospective longitudinal study of relocation disputes in Australia, involving interviews with 80 parents and 33 children in 70 families. In the five years following the relocation dispute, much changed for some of these families. A few mothers left without their children; several mothers returned to the original location; some fathers followed. There were also changes in some custody arrangements. The mothers who moved were not surprisingly satisfied with the outcome; however, even mothers who were not allowed to move mostly showed greater improvements in stress levels and mental health than fathers over the five year period, even if the fathers successfully opposed the move. Several mothers adapted to staying if they could see the benefit to their children. All children who moved adapted to the new location and made new friends; however, those who had close relationships with their father found it very hard to be a long distance from him. Drawing upon these interviews, it is argued that decision making in relocation cases must be resolutely child-centered. It cannot be based upon adults’ rights. Children usually benefit from a continuing relationship with a nonresident parent who wants to be involved in their lives. In the adjudication of relocation disputes, careful attention is needed to how close and how developmentally important the child’s relationship is with their nonresident parent. Consideration must also be given to whether the nonresident parent can move to the preferred location of the primary caregiver.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80822274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Factors associated with successful shared parenting following family dissolution 家庭解体后成功共同抚养子女的相关因素
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1438957
S. Braver, M. Lamb, Ned Holstein
{"title":"Factors associated with successful shared parenting following family dissolution","authors":"S. Braver, M. Lamb, Ned Holstein","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1438957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1438957","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The article provides a brief introduction to a special issue focused on shared parenting. The articles in the special issue provide up-to-date summaries of the research and scholarship relating to key questions and controversies around the effects of divorce and contrasting custody arrangements. Two articles focus on infant–parent attachments in separated families, two on the factors affecting the adjustment of children whose parents have separated, and two on the thorny issues posed by relocation disputes.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91390710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Quantity versus quality of nonresident father involvement: Deconstructing the argument that quantity doesn’t matter 非居民父亲参与的数量与质量:解构数量无关紧要的论点
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1437002
K. Adamsons
{"title":"Quantity versus quality of nonresident father involvement: Deconstructing the argument that quantity doesn’t matter","authors":"K. Adamsons","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1437002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1437002","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the last few decades, numerous studies have examined the impact of nonresident fathers on the well-being of their children, including two meta-analyses. Such research consistently has demonstrated that when nonresident fathers are involved with their children in positive ways, their children benefit substantially; however, studies also have found that the amount of nonresident father contact, in and of itself, typically is not associated with children’s well-being. Some scholars, practitioners, and policymakers have framed the nonsignificant associations between contact and child well-being as an argument against joint physical custody. This paper examines why such reasoning is flawed, and why both quality and quantity of nonresident father involvement are necessary to consider when wanting to promote the well-being of children.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88266909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Using implicit encouragement to increase narrative productivity in children: Preliminary evidence and legal implications. 使用隐性鼓励来提高儿童的叙事能力:初步证据和法律含义。
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1509758
Alma P Olaguez, Amy Castro, Kyndra C Cleveland, J Zoe Klemfuss, Jodi A Quas
{"title":"Using implicit encouragement to increase narrative productivity in children: Preliminary evidence and legal implications.","authors":"Alma P Olaguez,&nbsp;Amy Castro,&nbsp;Kyndra C Cleveland,&nbsp;J Zoe Klemfuss,&nbsp;Jodi A Quas","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2018.1509758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2018.1509758","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statements made by children in a range of legal settings can irrevocably impact their family structure, relationships, and living environment. Because these statements can fundamentally alter children's futures, efforts have been made to identify methods to enhance children's reports by increasing comprehensiveness, completeness, and accuracy. Interviewer support has broadly been considered a method of interest, but variations in what constitutes \"support\" have highlighted the need for greater specificity in documenting how different facets of supportive behaviors relate to children's reporting tendencies. In this review, we describe work focused on the effects of interviewer support, on children's memory completeness and accuracy. We then describe to a subset of interviewer behaviors that encourage elaboration in dyadic interactions: back-channeling and vocatives. We present preliminary evidence suggesting that these utterances, referred to as implicit encouragement, can increase the amount of detail provided without compromising accuracy. Implications for custody evaluations are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15379418.2018.1509758","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37625626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Misogyny in New York custody decisions with parental alienation and child sexual abuse allegations 纽约的监护权裁决中的厌女症，包括父母疏远和儿童性虐待指控
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2017.1416723
M. S. Milchman
{"title":"Misogyny in New York custody decisions with parental alienation and child sexual abuse allegations","authors":"M. S. Milchman","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2017.1416723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1416723","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes 24 New York (NY) published child custody cases decided between 2001 and 2017 that contained parental alienation and child sexual allegations. It addresses whether there was a tendency toward gendered decisions and the evidence on which the decisions were based. It reveals that most decisions favored alienation allegations over child sexual abuse allegations and transferring custody from mothers communicating sexual abuse allegations in court to fathers defending against them by alleging parental alienation. On appeal, these family court decisions were overwhelmingly upheld. The analysis also shows that the decisions were based as often on implicit misogynistic cultural assumptions in the absence of allegation-specific evidence as they were on allegation-specific evidence. The article adds to the growing understanding of sources of bias by proposing four errors that support biased reasoning. It concludes with suggestions about how experts, attorneys, and judges can question themselves and others to reduce bias.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79437821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases 父母疏离与儿童性虐待案件中的厌女文化争论
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2017.1416722
M. S. Milchman
{"title":"Misogynistic cultural argument in parental alienation versus child sexual abuse cases","authors":"M. S. Milchman","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2017.1416722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1416722","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article argues that major advances in parental alienation (PA) theory, since its inception as the Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), have not consistently been applied in custody litigation practice, because they do not serve advocacy needs; whereas, the misogynistic cultural argument in PAS, when relied on implicitly but not stated explicitly, can win cases. It first discusses advances in modern PA theory that eliminate misogyny. It then reviews feminist advances (1960s to 1980s) to show the threat to patriarchal power, and the fathers’ rights backlash, to explain their demand for legal redress. The hypothesis that a misogynistic cultural framework undermines evidence-based reasoning in child custody cases is supported with studies associating misogynistic beliefs with irrational thinking in multiple scientific areas, including child custody; and documents that show misogyny is a serious concern in the U.S. legal system. The article concludes by stating the need for evidence of misogynistic bias in custody decisions.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90737492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
A review of Legal Issues in Clinical Practice with Victims of Violence, by John E. B. Myers 《暴力受害者临床实践中的法律问题》，约翰·e·b·迈尔斯著
Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2017.1379367
A. Habib
{"title":"A review of Legal Issues in Clinical Practice with Victims of Violence, by John E. B. Myers","authors":"A. Habib","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2017.1379367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2017.1379367","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77095874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信