Journal of Child Custody最新文献_第2页

How far has parental alienation research progressed toward achieving scientific validity? 父母疏离的研究在取得科学有效性方面取得了多大进展?

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1614511

Madelyn Simring Milchman

引用次数: 13

Abusers gaining custody in family courts: A case series of over turned decisions 虐待者在家庭法庭上获得监护权:一系列被推翻的决定

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1613204

J. Silberg, S. Dallam

{"title":"Abusers gaining custody in family courts: A case series of over turned decisions","authors":"J. Silberg, S. Dallam","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2019.1613204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1613204","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents findings and recommendations based on an in-depth examination of records from 27 custody cases from across the United States. The goal of this case series was to determine why family courts may place children with a parent that the child alleges abused them rather than with the nonoffending parent. We focused on “turned around cases” involving allegations of child abuse that were at first viewed as false and later judged to be valid. The average time a child spent in the court ordered custody of an abusive parent was 3.2 years. In all cases we uncovered the father was the abusive parent and the mother sought to protect their child. Results revealed that initially courts were highly suspicious of mothers' motives for being concerned with abuse. These mothers were often treated poorly and two-thirds of the mothers were pathologized by the court for advocating for the safety of their children. Judges who initially ordered children into custody or visitation with abusive parents relied mainly on reports by custody evaluators and guardians ad litem who mistakenly accused mothers of attempting to alienate their children from the father or having coached the child to falsely report abuse. As a result, 59% of perpetrators were given sole custody and the rest were given joint custody or unsupervised visitation. After failing to be protected in the first custody determination, 88% of children reported new incidents of abuse. The abuse often became increasingly severe and the children's mental and physical health frequently deteriorated. The main reason that cases turned around was because protective parents were able to present compelling evidence of the abuse and back the evidence up with reports by mental health professionals who had specific expertise in child abuse rather than merely custody assessment.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72821401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 26

Parental denigration reports across parent–child dyads: Divorced parents underreport denigration behaviors compared to children 父母诋毁行为的报告:与孩子相比，离婚的父母少报诋毁行为

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1610135

J. Rowen, R. Emery

{"title":"Parental denigration reports across parent–child dyads: Divorced parents underreport denigration behaviors compared to children","authors":"J. Rowen, R. Emery","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2019.1610135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1610135","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Parental denigration is a phenomenon characterized by disparaging comments made by one parent about the other parent, in front of their children. It is an emerging area of research with implications that appear to follow from a conflict perspective, rather than a parental alienation perspective. In three prior studies of young adults, sibling pairs, and parents, denigration was found to be (a) measured reliably and validly, (b) reciprocally occurring, (c) related to children feeling more distant from both parents, particularly the more frequent denigrator, (d) associated with various measures of maladjustment, and (e) underreported by divorced parents. These results held across marital status and parent gender, in group and individual analyses, across sibling reports, and across studies. In the current study, parent reports of co-parent denigration behaviors were similar to child reports in both married and divorced families. However, divorced parents consistently underreported their own denigration behaviors compared to child reports, and their reports of parent–child closeness and attachment was not associated with child reports. This is consistent with findings from previous work that divorced parents may be less aware of their harmful behaviors and view co-parents in a globally more negative light than children perceive them.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74199374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Mothers’ adverse childhood experiences, depressive symptoms, parenting, and attachment as predictors of young children’s problems 母亲不良的童年经历、抑郁症状、养育和依恋作为幼儿问题的预测因子

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-03-25 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1575318

Maria Khan, K. Renk

引用次数: 14

How circle of security parenting can help you nurture your child’s attachment, emotional resilience, and freedom to explore 安全育儿圈如何帮助你培养孩子的依恋、情感弹性和探索自由

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-03-22 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1580963

Ashley Chambers

引用次数: 1

If love is blind, then hate cannot see: hate within enduring parenting disputes 如果爱是盲目的，那么仇恨就看不见:仇恨存在于持久的育儿纠纷中

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1568947

Leanne Francia, P. Millear, R. Sharman

引用次数: 1

Misperceptions and misapplications of research in family law cases: Myths of “Parental Alienation Syndrome” and implanted false memories 家事法案例研究的误解与误用:“父母疏离综合症”的神话与植入的错误记忆

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1609384

Morgan Shaw

引用次数: 1

Lost-in-the-mall: False memory or false defense? 迷失在商场:错误的记忆还是错误的防御?

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1590285

R. Blizard, Morgan Shaw

引用次数: 13

Are intensive parental alienation treatments effective and safe for children and adolescents? 强化父母疏离治疗对儿童和青少年有效和安全吗?

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2018.1557578

J. Mercer

引用次数: 31

Valid and invalid ways to assess the reason a child rejects a parent: The continued malignant role of “parental alienation syndrome” 评估孩子拒绝父母原因的有效和无效方法:“父母疏离综合症”的持续恶性作用

Journal of Child Custody Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/15379418.2019.1590284

Roy Lubit

{"title":"Valid and invalid ways to assess the reason a child rejects a parent: The continued malignant role of “parental alienation syndrome”","authors":"Roy Lubit","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2019.1590284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1590284","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite widespread rejection of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), some custody evaluators use the presence of its components to invalidate abuse allegations and blame the preferred parent. Although PAS supporters claim that the elements of PAS are unique to Parental Alienation (PA) and can, therefore, be used to diagnose it, no scientific study has yet demonstrated this. Reanalysis of Gardner’s data, and our current knowledge of children, indicate that the elements of PAS are not unique to PA. Many PA/PAS advocates approach custody cases assuming that when children reject parents, it is probably the result of a denigration campaign by the preferred parent. Confirmation bias then leads the evaluator to spin, value, and vet information so that it support their expected conclusion. Children’s avoidance of significant visitation with a parent is often driven by a desire to remain with their primary attachment figure, rather than a rejection of the other parent. Forcing visitation and cutting the children’s time with the primary attachment figure leads to rejection of that parent, rather than solving it. The article suggests a method of scientifically assessing if a child’s rejection of a parent is due to PA, affinity, or justified rejection.","PeriodicalId":45478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Custody","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79253479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13