Columbia Journal of Transnational Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
User-Generated Evidence 用户生成的证据
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2018-08-15 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3124409
R. Hamilton
{"title":"User-Generated Evidence","authors":"R. Hamilton","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3124409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3124409","url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, people are using their smartphones to document atrocities. This Article is the first to address the implications of this important development for international criminal law. While acknowledging the potential benefits such user-generated evidence could have for international criminal investigations, the Article identifies three categories of concern related to its use: (i) user security; (ii) evidentiary bias; and (iii) fair trial rights. In the absence of safeguards, user-generated evidence may address current problems in international criminal justice at the cost of creating new ones and shifting existing problems from traditional actors, who have institutional backing, to individual users without such protections.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"1-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43512690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Domestic Standing of International Law: A Non-State Account 国际法的国内地位:非国家账户
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3191064
Tamar Megiddo
{"title":"The Domestic Standing of International Law: A Non-State Account","authors":"Tamar Megiddo","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3191064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3191064","url":null,"abstract":"Despite its central contribution to the construction of the global legal order, the United States has long been perceived to exclude itself from the reach of international law. Its exceptionalist image has been reinforced by statements of political leaders, federal law provisions, and court decisions. This Article argues, however, that in order to appropriately assess international law’s standing in the United States, one must consider not only the position of its formal government but also the interpretation, application, and challenge of international law by non-State actors. Moreover, it stresses the importance of studying not only elite actors’ engagement with international law but also that of individuals, groups, and organizations outside the formal bureaucracy.The Article surveys interventions by government officials, producers, consumers, and civil society representatives in the context of a U.S. policy-making process initiated pursuant to a World Trade Organization ruling. It shows that, contrary to the United States’ exceptionalist image, U.S. actors of all stripes invoked and relied on international law extensively, thereby carving a space for it as a non-negligible consideration in the decision-making process. Therefore, the Article argues that accounting for non-State stakeholders is imperative in evaluating the domestic standing of international law.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"494-534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43000039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Conceiving Criminality: An Evaluation of Abortion Decriminalization Reform in New York and Great Britain 构想犯罪:纽约和英国堕胎非罪化改革评价
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3184061
Swara Saraiya
{"title":"Conceiving Criminality: An Evaluation of Abortion Decriminalization Reform in New York and Great Britain","authors":"Swara Saraiya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3184061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3184061","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"174-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68569698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The State Power to Boycott a Boycott:: The Thorny Constitutionality of State Anti-BDS Laws 抵制抵制的国家权力:国家反bds法律的棘手合宪性
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3186369
T. Cuffman
{"title":"The State Power to Boycott a Boycott:: The Thorny Constitutionality of State Anti-BDS Laws","authors":"T. Cuffman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3186369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3186369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"115-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68569431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hiding in the Light: The Misuse of Disclosure to Advance the Business and Human Rights Agenda 隐藏在光中:滥用信息披露来推进商业和人权议程
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2017-08-29 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3028826
Jena Martin
{"title":"Hiding in the Light: The Misuse of Disclosure to Advance the Business and Human Rights Agenda","authors":"Jena Martin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3028826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3028826","url":null,"abstract":"In June 2017, Waitrose, a top UK supermarket, pulled its cans of corned beef off the shelves after an investigation revealed that the meat might have been produced with slave labor. At the time of the recall, Waitrose was in compliance with the UK Modern Slavery Act, a 2015 law enacted to prevent human trafficking and modern-day slavery. Under the Modern Slavery Act, corporations are required to file annual reports disclosing what action they had taken to eradicate slavery and human trafficking in their supply chains. The Modern Slavery Act was a much-lauded law that is part of the growing trend of States to move the international business and human rights agenda forward. A key component of that agenda involves disseminating the U.N.’s Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework and implementing the U.N. Guiding Principles, which have been praised by States around the world as a framing mechanism for assessing corporate accountability for negative human rights impacts caused by a corporation’s operations and relationships with its suppliers. \u0000 \u0000This article analyzes whether the business and human rights agenda (as embodied by the Three Pillar Framework and U.N. Guiding Principles) is well served by national laws that focus on disclosure. The article focuses primarily on rules being implemented in the United States at both the subnational and national level; however, it also discusses approaches being used in European jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and France and the overall trend towards a transparency model for human rights protection made necessary by business activities. The increased use of disclosure-based regulation (and the resulting compliance efforts by corporations) seems to come, at least in part, as a result of the efforts by States to address the duties laid out for them in the U.N. Guiding Principles. As such, it is appropriate to undertake an analysis regarding whether these laws are in fact effectively implementing the Guiding Principles. \u0000 \u0000For decades now, disclosure has been held out as the ultimate curative for almost every corporate woe. The expansion of disclosure initiatives from mere investment-related issues to (increasingly) social-policy issues suggest that this trend will continue. Yet, as this article demonstrates, disclosure right now is at best a temporary stop gap measure that can lead to limited corporate change on the issue of business and human rights. At worst, disclosure is being used by corporations as a way to obtain a reputational advantage without actually making substantive changes – by simply hiding in the light.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"56 1","pages":"530-592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.3028826","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45241219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Bridging the Legitimacy Divide: The International Criminal Court's Domestic Perception Challenge 弥合合法性分歧:国际刑事法院对国内认知的挑战
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2017-08-10 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3016621
Y. Dutton
{"title":"Bridging the Legitimacy Divide: The International Criminal Court's Domestic Perception Challenge","authors":"Y. Dutton","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3016621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3016621","url":null,"abstract":"56 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 70 (2017)","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"56 1","pages":"71-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47881046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Model International Mobility Convention 国际流动示范公约
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.7916/D8GB3MH4
D. Acosta, T. Aleinikoff, K. Banerjee, E. Barkan, P. Bertrand, J. Bhagwati, Joseph Blocher, Emma Borgnäs, Frans Bouwen, S. Cliffe, Kevin L. Cope, F. Crépeau, M. Doyle, Y. Ergas, D. FitzGerald, François Fouinat, J. Gest, B. Ghosh, G. Goodwin-Gill, Randall S. Hansen, M. Karlsson, Donald M. Kerwin, K. Koser, Rey Koslowski, I. M. Kysel, J. MacDermott, Susan F. Martin, S. Miller, Elora Mukherjee, Parvati Nair, Steven S. Nam, Daniel Naujoks, J. Ocampo, Margaret Powers, Benedita Menezes Queiroz, S. Rajan, S. Rosengaertner, Bianca Santos, S. Sassen, Peter J. Spiro, Colleen V. Thouez, J. Trachtman
{"title":"Model International Mobility Convention","authors":"D. Acosta, T. Aleinikoff, K. Banerjee, E. Barkan, P. Bertrand, J. Bhagwati, Joseph Blocher, Emma Borgnäs, Frans Bouwen, S. Cliffe, Kevin L. Cope, F. Crépeau, M. Doyle, Y. Ergas, D. FitzGerald, François Fouinat, J. Gest, B. Ghosh, G. Goodwin-Gill, Randall S. Hansen, M. Karlsson, Donald M. Kerwin, K. Koser, Rey Koslowski, I. M. Kysel, J. MacDermott, Susan F. Martin, S. Miller, Elora Mukherjee, Parvati Nair, Steven S. Nam, Daniel Naujoks, J. Ocampo, Margaret Powers, Benedita Menezes Queiroz, S. Rajan, S. Rosengaertner, Bianca Santos, S. Sassen, Peter J. Spiro, Colleen V. Thouez, J. Trachtman","doi":"10.7916/D8GB3MH4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8GB3MH4","url":null,"abstract":"People are as mobile as they ever were in our globalized world. Yet the movement of people across borders lacks global regulation, leaving many people unprotected in irregular and dire situations and some States concerned that their borders have become irrelevant. And international mobility—the movement of individuals across borders for any length of time as visitors, students, tourists, labor migrants, entrepreneurs, long-term residents, family members, asylum seekers, or refugees—has no common definition or legal framework. There does exist a well-established refugee regime based on the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Additional Protocol, both implemented by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). As the nature of conflict has changed in recent decades, however, this regime has shown strain and weakness. Today there are more than sixty-five million displaced persons in the world, a level not seen since World War II. Mixed flows of labor migrants and refugees fleeing for safety and economic prospects have created a crisis in the asylum-seeking process. Those forced to","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"56 1","pages":"219-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71366491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Regionalism, Regime Complexes and the Crisis in International Criminal Justice 区域主义、政权复合体与国际刑事司法危机
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2016-05-22 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2293988
Matiangai Sirleaf
{"title":"Regionalism, Regime Complexes and the Crisis in International Criminal Justice","authors":"Matiangai Sirleaf","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2293988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2293988","url":null,"abstract":"This Article identifies an emerging regime complex in the field of international criminal law and analyzes the development of the regional criminal chamber to the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. A regime complex refers to the way in which two or more institutions intersect in terms of their scope and purpose. This Article discusses how the International Criminal Court’s institutional crisis created a space for regional innovation. It demonstrates how the development of a regional criminal tribunal in Africa is the result of intersecting factors in international criminal justice. It finds that regime complexes can form not only due to strategic inconsistencies as discussed in the literature, but also because of the influence of regional integration. It argues that the regionalization of international criminal law is a useful addition to the field of international criminal justice, which has hitherto been hampered by the limitations of both domestic and international adjudication. This Article concludes that regionalization of international criminal law is a positive development.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"54 1","pages":"699-778"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2293988","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68072834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Macedonia's Ohrid Framework Agreement Reexamined in Response to Internal and External Crises: Reason for Cautious Optimism on Europe's Southeastern Border 内部和外部危机对马其顿奥赫里德框架协议的重新审视:对欧洲东南边界持谨慎乐观态度的理由
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2016-04-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2763264
A. Ruffer
{"title":"Macedonia's Ohrid Framework Agreement Reexamined in Response to Internal and External Crises: Reason for Cautious Optimism on Europe's Southeastern Border","authors":"A. Ruffer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2763264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2763264","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, a number of variables put Macedonia at an increased risk of instability. These factors include Macedonia’s tense relationship with Greece, the strain posed by the European migration crisis, the potential for escalation of simmering interethnic conflict within Macedonia’s borders, and Macedonia’s recent government scandals. Because of the security risks that an unstable Macedonia poses to the European Union (EU), it is crucial for the EU to seek new ways to bring Macedonia closer into the fray of European institutions. This Note assesses the continued durability of existing domestic and regional legal regimes to cope with the increased strain caused by the abovementioned destabilizing factors. The Note poses several ways in which the EU can use Membership to create a more durable legal regime in Macedonia; and it discusses some of the major impediments that the EU should consider when deciding the proper incentive structure to use in Membership discussions. Given Macedonia’s baseline for rule of law and proven desire to join the EU, there is reason for cautious optimism that Macedonia’s legal regime will remain durable if the EU uses the reward of EU accession tactfully in the coming years.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"55 1","pages":"457-498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68300462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extraterritorial Lethal Targeting: Deconstructing the Logic of International Law 域外致命瞄准:解构国际法逻辑
IF 1 4区 社会学
Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2013-11-27 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2226359
M. Schmitt
{"title":"Extraterritorial Lethal Targeting: Deconstructing the Logic of International Law","authors":"M. Schmitt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2226359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2226359","url":null,"abstract":"This article sets for a framework for examining the legality of extraterritorial lethal strikes (\"targeted killings\") in international law.","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"52 1","pages":"77-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2226359","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68006079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信