Model International Mobility Convention

IF 1.2 4区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.7916/D8GB3MH4

D. Acosta, T. Aleinikoff, K. Banerjee, E. Barkan, P. Bertrand, J. Bhagwati, Joseph Blocher, Emma Borgnäs, Frans Bouwen, S. Cliffe, Kevin L. Cope, F. Crépeau, M. Doyle, Y. Ergas, D. FitzGerald, François Fouinat, J. Gest, B. Ghosh, G. Goodwin-Gill, Randall S. Hansen, M. Karlsson, Donald M. Kerwin, K. Koser, Rey Koslowski, I. M. Kysel, J. MacDermott, Susan F. Martin, S. Miller, Elora Mukherjee, Parvati Nair, Steven S. Nam, Daniel Naujoks, J. Ocampo, Margaret Powers, Benedita Menezes Queiroz, S. Rajan, S. Rosengaertner, Bianca Santos, S. Sassen, Peter J. Spiro, Colleen V. Thouez, J. Trachtman

{"title":"Model International Mobility Convention","authors":"D. Acosta, T. Aleinikoff, K. Banerjee, E. Barkan, P. Bertrand, J. Bhagwati, Joseph Blocher, Emma Borgnäs, Frans Bouwen, S. Cliffe, Kevin L. Cope, F. Crépeau, M. Doyle, Y. Ergas, D. FitzGerald, François Fouinat, J. Gest, B. Ghosh, G. Goodwin-Gill, Randall S. Hansen, M. Karlsson, Donald M. Kerwin, K. Koser, Rey Koslowski, I. M. Kysel, J. MacDermott, Susan F. Martin, S. Miller, Elora Mukherjee, Parvati Nair, Steven S. Nam, Daniel Naujoks, J. Ocampo, Margaret Powers, Benedita Menezes Queiroz, S. Rajan, S. Rosengaertner, Bianca Santos, S. Sassen, Peter J. Spiro, Colleen V. Thouez, J. Trachtman","doi":"10.7916/D8GB3MH4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People are as mobile as they ever were in our globalized world. Yet the movement of people across borders lacks global regulation, leaving many people unprotected in irregular and dire situations and some States concerned that their borders have become irrelevant. And international mobility—the movement of individuals across borders for any length of time as visitors, students, tourists, labor migrants, entrepreneurs, long-term residents, family members, asylum seekers, or refugees—has no common definition or legal framework. There does exist a well-established refugee regime based on the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Additional Protocol, both implemented by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). As the nature of conflict has changed in recent decades, however, this regime has shown strain and weakness. Today there are more than sixty-five million displaced persons in the world, a level not seen since World War II. Mixed flows of labor migrants and refugees fleeing for safety and economic prospects have created a crisis in the asylum-seeking process. Those forced to","PeriodicalId":45475,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8GB3MH4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

People are as mobile as they ever were in our globalized world. Yet the movement of people across borders lacks global regulation, leaving many people unprotected in irregular and dire situations and some States concerned that their borders have become irrelevant. And international mobility—the movement of individuals across borders for any length of time as visitors, students, tourists, labor migrants, entrepreneurs, long-term residents, family members, asylum seekers, or refugees—has no common definition or legal framework. There does exist a well-established refugee regime based on the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Additional Protocol, both implemented by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). As the nature of conflict has changed in recent decades, however, this regime has shown strain and weakness. Today there are more than sixty-five million displaced persons in the world, a level not seen since World War II. Mixed flows of labor migrants and refugees fleeing for safety and economic prospects have created a crisis in the asylum-seeking process. Those forced to

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际流动示范公约

在这个全球化的世界里，人们的流动性一如既往。然而，人们的跨境流动缺乏全球监管，使许多人处于不正常和可怕的境地，得不到保护，一些国家担心其边界已变得无关紧要。国际流动——个人以访客、学生、游客、劳工移民、企业家、长期居民、家庭成员、寻求庇护者或难民身份跨越国界的任何时间的流动——没有共同的定义或法律框架。根据1951年的《难民公约》及其1967年的《附加议定书》，确实存在一个完善的难民制度，这两项公约均由联合国难民事务高级专员办事处(难民专员办事处)执行。然而，随着近几十年来冲突性质的变化，该政权已显示出紧张和软弱。今天，世界上有6500多万流离失所者，这是第二次世界大战以来从未见过的水平。为了安全和经济前景而逃离的劳工移民和难民的混合流动在寻求庇护的过程中造成了危机。那些被迫

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Multiple-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over forty years] ago, under the guidance of the late Professor Wolfgang Friedmann, a group of Columbia law students belonging to the Columbia Society of International Law founded the Bulletin of the Columbia Society of International Law. The Bulletin’s first volume, containing two issues, was a forum for the informal discussion of international legal questions; the second volume, published in 1963 under the title International Law Bulletin, aspired more to the tradition of the scholarly law review. Today’s Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is heir to those early efforts.