Criminal Law and Philosophy最新文献_第3页

Responses and Appreciations 回应及赞赏

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09707-2

Michael S. Moore

引用次数: 0

Examining the Ethics of Spying: A Practitioner’s View 审视间谍行为的伦理:一个实践者的观点

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09704-5

David Omand

引用次数: 0

Idealizing Abolition 理想化废除

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09700-9

Daniel Fryer

{"title":"Idealizing Abolition","authors":"Daniel Fryer","doi":"10.1007/s11572-023-09700-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09700-9","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The United States system of policing is in drastic need of change. Some recent critics have encouraged that we avoid trying to repair the system—and abolish it altogether. In advancing this position, they often invoke ideas of “dreams,” “speculative imagination,” and “horizons” to guide efforts at fixing the problems of policing. In this essay, I caution against the overuse of this sort of idealized discourse in debates about policing. Specifically, I show how idealizations risk being counterproductive with respect to abolitionists’ activist goals, in that they suggest that if abolition is desirable, approximating abolition is also desirable; fail to clarify what the conditions of application of their view are; and operate without the feasibility-sensitivity that one should expect from a non-evaluative position. My goal is not to suggest that our system of policing is fine as is. Nor is it to diminish the importance of having a long-term revolutionary vision. By pointing out the ways in which the idealizations invoked are inconsistent with abolitionists’ activist agenda, I hope to help clarify the merits of police abolition as a guiding strategy for change and caution against the use of certain forms of idealized thinking in our efforts at police reform.","PeriodicalId":45447,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135604637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Public Wrongs and Power Relations in Non-Democratic & Illiberal Polities 非民主社会中的公共过错与权力关系狭隘的政治

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09703-6

Hend Hanafy

{"title":"Public Wrongs and Power Relations in Non-Democratic & Illiberal Polities","authors":"Hend Hanafy","doi":"10.1007/s11572-023-09703-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-023-09703-6","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One of the influential contributions to criminalisation theories is Duff’s work on public wrongs, which offers a thin master principle of criminalisation, proposing that we have a reason to criminalise a type of conduct if it constitutes a public wrong; one that violates a polity’s civil order and forms part of that polity’s proper business. The nature of the civil order, the scope of its proper business, and the distinction between the public and private realms of wrongs are context-relative to each polity, structured by their legal, institutional, and informal values and ways of life. Such a context-relative view led to problematic criminalisation examples raised by Duff and his critics. This article engages more fully with the relativism of the civil order and public wrongs in non-democratic and illiberal contexts. It draws on examples such as Saudi Arabi and Iran, and Beetham’s work on the legitimation of power to argue that conceptualising the civil order as an undifferentiated whole that represents a polity’s chosen way of life overlooks the ways in which the civil order’s values and practices are shaped by relations of power and exclusion rules and processes. This, in turn, exposes the theory to the risk of mirroring and legitimising unequal relations of power and impeding efforts to change them. This is also due to the theory’s lack of proper normative guidance on the legitimacy of criminalisation. The potential commitment to – instead of a preference for – democracy and guarantees of equality and freedoms might help strengthen the theory normatively, but it is insufficient to guard against the raised problems.","PeriodicalId":45447,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135308648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Justification and Motivation 理由和动机

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09691-7

James Edwards

引用次数: 0

Criminal Responsibility Reconsidered 刑事责任再思考

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09702-7

S. Morse

引用次数: 0

Excuses and Exemptions: Is it Really a Mistake to Understand the Category of Excuses to Include Infancy and Insanity? 借口和豁免:理解包括婴儿和精神错乱的借口类别真的是一个错误吗?

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09698-0

M. Baron

引用次数: 0

Review of The Criminal Law’s Person, edited by Claes Lernestedt and Matt Matravers. Oxford: Hart, 2022 《刑法人物评论》，克拉斯·勒内斯泰特和马特·马特拉弗斯主编。牛津:Hart, 2022

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09699-z

Tatjana Hörnle

引用次数: 0

When is Disbelief Epistemic Injustice? Criminal Procedure, Recovered Memories, and Deformations of the Epistemic Subject 什么时候怀疑是认知的不公正?刑事诉讼、恢复记忆与认知主体的变形

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-08-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09695-3

J. Bublitz

引用次数: 0

Reporting Crimes and Arresting Criminals: Citizens’ Rights and Responsibilities Under Their Criminal Law 举报犯罪与逮捕犯罪:刑法赋予公民的权利与义务

IF 0.5

Criminal Law and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11572-023-09701-8

R. Duff, S. Marshall

引用次数: 0