Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology最新文献_第10页

Reciprocity in Aegean Palatial Societies: Gifts, Debt, and the Foundations of Economic Exchange 爱琴海宫廷社会中的互惠:礼物、债务和经济交换的基础

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-06-06 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V29I1.31013

Dimitri Nakassis, M. Galaty, W. Parkinson

{"title":"Reciprocity in Aegean Palatial Societies: Gifts, Debt, and the Foundations of Economic Exchange","authors":"Dimitri Nakassis, M. Galaty, W. Parkinson","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V29I1.31013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V29I1.31013","url":null,"abstract":"This collection of papers is the third and final installment in a series meant to update the archaeological study of Aegean Bronze Age economies based on current research in economic anthropology and new archaeological and textual data from Minoan and Mycenaean states. The first collection, titled ‘Redistribution in Aegean Palatial Societies’, was published in the American Journal of Archaeology in 2011 (volume 115.2). The second, titled ‘Crafts, Specialists, and Markets in Mycenaean Greece,’ was published in the American Journal of Archaeology in 2013 (volume 117.3). In these first two collections, we argued that studies of ‘redistribution’ in Aegean palatial societies, whether archaeological, textual, or both, fail to capture the totality of economic activity that must have occurred in Late Bronze Age states and largely ignore the social implications of such activity. Rather, in order to explain the regional distribution of artifacts, some form of ‘market’-based exchange must have occurred. In this introduction we suggest that systems of ‘reciprocity’ preceded and underpinned modes of redistribution and market exchange, and also served to integrate Bronze Age social structures.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"117 1","pages":"61-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2016-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1558/JMEA.V29I1.31013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67566244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 22

Comments on Campana and Crabtree 'Communal Hunting in the Natufian of the Southern Levant: The Social and Economic Implications 坎帕纳和克拉布特里在南黎凡特纳图夫的集体狩猎:社会和经济意义的评论

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-05-02 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V4I1.29872

P. Rowley-Conwy

引用次数: 0

Socially Embedded Work Practices and Production Organization in the Roman Mediterranean: Beyond Industry Lines 社会嵌入的工作实践和生产组织在罗马地中海:超越工业线

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29532

Elizabeth A. Murphy

{"title":"Socially Embedded Work Practices and Production Organization in the Roman Mediterranean: Beyond Industry Lines","authors":"Elizabeth A. Murphy","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29532","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29532","url":null,"abstract":"Building upon a long tradition of production organization models developed from the 1970s through the 1990s and incorporating approaches developed by economic anthropologists, this paper proposes a new theoretical framework for the archaeological study of Roman work activities that analyzes not only the way that economic activities were structured but also the sets of practices that accompany the execution of tasks. Working outside of materially-defined industry parameters, this theoretical discussion is developed through the investigation of several case studies of transformative production processes in the Roman world (e.g., potting, textile working, and baking), in which similar customs can be observed that are employed across industry lines. Obviously, in any given society there are numerous ways by which to conduct business activities, and it is argued here that, by observing patterning in the arrangement of labor, movement of raw materials, and locations of production, we can begin to garner insight into broader cultural approaches to economic decision-making as embedded in larger social institutions.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"28 1","pages":"221-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29532","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67565328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

The Judean Desert as a Chalcolithic Necropolis 作为铜器时代墓地的犹太沙漠

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29530

D. Ilan, Y. Rowan

{"title":"The Judean Desert as a Chalcolithic Necropolis","authors":"D. Ilan, Y. Rowan","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29530","url":null,"abstract":"Cave deposits represent a special category of archaeological context that invokes its own set of research questions. The interpretation of these deposits, however, is often based on unfounded assumptions. The idea of ‘cave men’ utilizing caves as domestic space persists to this day, both in the public imagination and in archaeological interpretation. But a cave is not generally a good place to live; the adoption of caves as living space occurs in times of emergency and is short-lived. Yet caves were commonly used for human burial and as the locus of ritual activity. This is strikingly true for the Chalcolithic period (ca. 4500–3600 BC) in the southern Levant. But the idea that people frequently lived in caves in the Chalcolithic persists, bolstered by the presence of quotidian objects excavated in cave contexts. In this study, we focus on Chalcolithic deposits in the caves of the Judean Desert, and suggest that many of them were the loci of mortuary interment and its associated ritual practice. We suggest further that the ‘Ein Gedi sanctuary and the Nahal Mishmar hoard are both associated with the mortuary complex of the Judean Desert.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"17 1","pages":"171-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29530","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67565643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

De-contextualising and Re-contextualising: Why Mediterranean Archaeology Needs to Get out of the Trench and Back into the Museum 去语境化和重新语境化:为什么地中海考古学需要走出战壕，回到博物馆

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29533

R. Osborne

{"title":"De-contextualising and Re-contextualising: Why Mediterranean Archaeology Needs to Get out of the Trench and Back into the Museum","authors":"R. Osborne","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29533","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29533","url":null,"abstract":"University museums currently play a small part in the research of Mediterranean archaeologists. One major reason for this is that Mediterranean archaeology has become overwhelmingly concerned with understanding objects in the context in which they were found. Museums re-contextualise objects. In this paper I argue that, far from this being a problem, it is an opportunity—an opportunity to escape from the tyranny of the last resting place, of only understanding where objects ended their ancient social lives, and to uncover what artefacts did in their working lives. After a discussion of some extreme means of re-contextualising, two case studies are explored where the idiosyncrasies of university museum collections (the presence of replicas and the random selection of artefacts) are exploited to show how fundamental issues in Mediterranean archaeology can be pursued through such collections. In the first case the juxtaposition of plaster casts of three statues ascribed to the same sculptor or workshop is made to yield a distinctive approach to understanding interactions between gods and men that offers insight into Greek theological assumptions. In the second a peculiarly shaped field for decoration on particular Athenian pots is shown to encourage reflection on a particular aspect of human inter-relations and to have implications not simply for the way pots exercise agency and for the attitudes of painters, but for interpersonal relations in the Mediterranean societies that consumed such pottery.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"28 1","pages":"241-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1558/JMEA.V28I2.29533","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67565425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

Responses to Critical Reviews of Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Volume 1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece 1785-1985 对《黑色雅典娜:古典文明的亚非根源》批评评论的回应。第一卷:古希腊的捏造1785-1985

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29838

M. Bernal

引用次数: 3

Some Comments on Interpreting the Dark-Surfaced Handmade Burnished Pottery of the 13th and 12th Century BCE Aegean 对公元前13、12世纪爱琴海暗面手工抛光陶器的解读

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836

J. Rutter

{"title":"Some Comments on Interpreting the Dark-Surfaced Handmade Burnished Pottery of the 13th and 12th Century BCE Aegean","authors":"J. Rutter","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29836","url":null,"abstract":"David Small's attempt (JMA this issue) to explain the appearance, at major centers in the late Minoan-Mycenaean world, of dark-surfaced, handmade, and burnished vessels as a response to economic stress by native Aegean smallholders is reviewed. With the possible exception of the terminal Mycenaean material from Kalapodi in Phocis, Small's hypothesis fails to explain the ceramic data presently known: the novel pottery in question is distinguished not merely by its technology but also by a typology of shape and decoration which Small has ignored because he mistakenly considers it more or less universal in the context of a household mode of production. \u0000A brief review of such issues as this handmade pottery's distribution, frequency, impact on native Aegean wheelmade wares, and function(s) within the Minoan-Mycenaean world leads to the conclusion that past evaluations of the origins and significance of this material have probably been unduly oversimplified. Future progress on addressing these and related questions is dependent on fuller publication of this fundamentally non-Aegean pottery in the Minoan and Aegean contexts in which it has been found.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"3 1","pages":"29-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2016-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67566554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

The Santorini Eruption: An Up-date 圣托里尼火山喷发:最新消息

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V2I2.29835

S. Manning

引用次数: 0

Greece and the Levant 希腊和黎凡特

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI: 10.1558/JMEA.V3I1.29839

Sarah P. Morris

引用次数: 1

Black Athena and the Phoenicians 黑雅典娜和腓尼基人

IF 0.8 2区历史学

Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-03-02 DOI: 10.1558/jmea.v3i1.29840

P. Bikai

引用次数: 0