Anatolian Studies最新文献_第8页

Phrygians east of the red river: Phrygianisation, migration and desertion 红河以东的弗里吉亚人：弗里吉亚化、移民和遗弃

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-11 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154618000042

G. D. Summers

引用次数: 5

An analysis of Byzantine burials from Hacımusalar Höyük (Turkey) 来自Hacımusalar Höyük(土耳其)的拜占庭墓葬分析

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-11 DOI: 10.1017/s0066154618000066

Carrie L. Sulosky Weaver

引用次数: 2

Neutron activation analysis of Aegean-style IIIC pottery from the Goldman excavations at Tarsus-Gözlükule Tarsus-Gözlükule出土的爱琴海IIIC型陶器的中子活化分析

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-11 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154618000030

P. Mountjoy, H. Mommsen, A. Özyar

{"title":"Neutron activation analysis of Aegean-style IIIC pottery from the Goldman excavations at Tarsus-Gözlükule","authors":"P. Mountjoy, H. Mommsen, A. Özyar","doi":"10.1017/S0066154618000030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154618000030","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The appearance of Aegean-style IIIC pottery at Tarsus occured at a time of unrest and of movement of peoples resulting in part from the collapse of the Mycenaean palaces on the Greek mainland. Mycenaean Late Helladic IIIB pottery exports from mainland Greece to Cyprus and the Levant disappeared and were gradually replaced by local imitations. Eventually Aegean-style IIIC pottery appeared in the East Aegean-West Anatolian Interface, in Cyprus and at various sites on the southern coast of Turkey and in the Levant. It was not exported from the Greek mainland, but seems to have been locally made at each site. A first series of neutron activation analysis (NAA) was carried out on pottery from Tarsus to determine how much of the Aegean-style 12th-century BC pottery was locally produced, how much was imported and, if imported, from whence it came. The favourable results of this first analysis gave rise to a second NAA of more Aegean-style pottery from Tarsus, bringing the total number of pieces analysed to 67. It has confirmed the local production of the pottery; the chemical group TarA is the dominant local group at Tarsus, comprising a third of the samples. A smaller group, TarB, may also be local. The analysis revealed a large number of Aegean-style IIIC imports from Cyprus from several different sites; these make up a quarter of the samples. There are a few imports from other areas, including the East Aegean-West Anatolian Interface. Influence from both Cyprus and the Interface can also be seen at Tarsus in the use of some shapes and motifs. A comparison with 12th-century BC imports identified by NAA at the site of Tell Kazel (ancient Simyra) in Syria directly east of Cyprus shows imports from the same two areas.","PeriodicalId":45130,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066154618000030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48940703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An Anatolian-Persian tomb relief from Gökçeler in Lydia 吕底亚Gökçeler的安纳托利亚波斯陵墓浮雕

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-11 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154618000054

Figen Çevirici-Coşkun

{"title":"An Anatolian-Persian tomb relief from Gökçeler in Lydia","authors":"Figen Çevirici-Coşkun","doi":"10.1017/S0066154618000054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154618000054","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relief block at the centre of this study was found in 2004 in a ploughed field in the northern region of Lydia near the village of Gökçeler in the district of Akhisar, in what is today the Manisa province. A standing male figure is depicted on the block, which probably belonged to a chamber tomb. Holding a cock and a bud in his hands, stylistically the figure points to a date between the late sixth century BC and the early fifth century BC. He has short, spiral curls and wears a long-sleeved, tight-fitting garment that appears to be influenced by the Persian style. Within the scope of Anatolian-Persian funerary reliefs, this example is particularly significant due to its typological and iconographical elements. Specifically, following comparisons with other works of the Persian period, it is possible to suggest that the figure on the Gökçeler relief is an African who is offering a gift to the tomb owner; the latter may have been Persian or have served a Persian. Thus, this relief has particular significance since it is the only known work of Anatolian-Persian sculpture which indicates that individuals of African origin lived in the Anatolian region under Persian rule.","PeriodicalId":45130,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066154618000054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47468376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

ANK volume 67 Cover and Back matter ANK第67卷封面和封底

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/s0066154617000138

引用次数: 0

Reflections of faraway places: the Chalcolithic personal ornaments of Canhasan I 远方的倒影：坎哈桑一世的铜色个人饰品

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154617000035

E. Baysal

引用次数: 5

ANK volume 67 Cover and Front matter 银行第67卷封面和正面问题

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/s0066154617000126

引用次数: 0

Crimean Tatars in explorative and travel writing: 1782–1802 克里米亚鞑靼人的探险和旅行写作:1782-1802

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154617000060

Beatrice Teissier

{"title":"Crimean Tatars in explorative and travel writing: 1782–1802","authors":"Beatrice Teissier","doi":"10.1017/S0066154617000060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154617000060","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the portrayal of Crimea, particularly Crimean Tatars and their culture, through the writings of nine men and women who travelled in the region in the late 18th century. These writers travelled in different capacities and represent a diversity of viewpoints; they include figures of the Russian academic and political establishment and western European travellers, with or without Russian affiliations. The article sets their writings in the context of the imperial Russian rhetoric of conquest associated with the annexation of Crimea in 1783 and Catherine II's tour of the area four years later. This rhetoric remains relevant today through the marked persistence of certain historic tropes in contemporary Russian attitudes towards Crimea. The article also discusses the writers’ responses to Crimea in the light of broader Enlightenment tropes in travel writing and ethnographic observation. It examines the extent to which the travellers’ accounts of Crimea were shaped by notions of ancient Greek heritage, Scythians and ‘Tartar hordes’, attitudes towards the Ottoman Empire (Crimea had previously been an Ottoman protectorate) and Islam, and 18th-century orientalism.","PeriodicalId":45130,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066154617000060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44484233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Patterns of metal procurement, manufacture and exchange in Early Bronze Age northwestern Anatolia: Demircihüyük and beyond 青铜时代早期安纳托利亚西北部的金属采购、制造和交换模式：Demirchüyük及其后

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154617000084

M. Massa, Orlene McIlfatrick, E. Fidan

{"title":"Patterns of metal procurement, manufacture and exchange in Early Bronze Age northwestern Anatolia: Demircihüyük and beyond","authors":"M. Massa, Orlene McIlfatrick, E. Fidan","doi":"10.1017/S0066154617000084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154617000084","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper adds a new interpretive layer to the already extremely well-investigated site of Demircihüyük, a small Early Bronze Age settlement at the northwestern fringes of the central Anatolian plateau. It presents a reassessment of the evidence for prehistoric mining in the region, as well as a new programme of chemical composition analysis integrated with an object functional and technological typology of the site's metal assemblages. The results reveal complex manufacturing techniques (such as bivalve mould casting, plating and lost wax) and the co-occurrence of several alloying types, including the earliest tin bronzes in the region. Object typology further indicates that the Demircihüyük community was at the intersection of two distinct metallurgical networks: one centred on the western Anatolian highlands, the other spanning the northern part of the central plateau. Additionally, several strands of evidence suggest that the beginning of interregional exchanges, linking central Anatolia to northern Levantine and Mesopotamian societies, may have started at an earlier date than the commonly assumed ca 3000–2800 BC.","PeriodicalId":45130,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066154617000084","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43953178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Funerary and votive monuments in Graeco-Roman Cilicia: Hellenistic, Roman and early Byzantine examples in the museums of Mersin and Alanya 希腊罗马西里西亚的葬礼和还愿纪念碑：梅尔辛和阿兰亚博物馆中的希腊化、罗马和拜占庭早期的例子

IF 1.2 1区历史学

Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI: 10.1017/S0066154617000059

E. Laflı

引用次数: 2