{"title":"The Case for the Globality of Twenty-First-Century Poetry","authors":"Louise McCune","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.300","url":null,"abstract":"alt Hunter joins an ongoing movement in literary studies beyond regionalist and nationalist paradigms. Readers will find his book Forms of a World: Contemporary Poetry and the Making of Globalization a complement to Jahan Ramazani’s 2009 A Transnational Poetics, insofar as both critics read across hemispheres to make apparent the ways in which contemporary poetry filters and reimagines global circuits of exchange. The two differ in their theoretical commitments: whereas Ramazani draws on transnational studies, Hunter understands contemporary globality through a critique of capitalism. Accordingly, Forms of a World is the first to read Anglophone poetry of the late twentieth and twenty-first century alongside simultaneous developments in patterns of capitalist accumulation. While he acknowledges the large-scale and long-term effects wrought by the capitalist world-system since its inception approximately five hundred years ago, Hunter understands globalization as an era of capitalism that is only decades old. It follows, then, that when Hunter calls a poem “global,” he means to imply nothing in particular about subject matter, circulation, or authorship. Instead, a global poem is, for him, one that belongs to a period beginning in the 1970s, when a new production and financial system marked by transnational accumulation emerged to supplant earlier, national L O U I S E M C C U N E","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"300 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44849101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When Fiction Rocks!","authors":"Jessica E. Teague","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.282","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.282","url":null,"abstract":"n the heels of Bob Dylan’s 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature there was an immediate outpouring of debate in both academic and popular circles, on Twitter and in the press. The fury on both sides was, perhaps, predictable. Should the world’s most prestigious literary award be allowed to go to a popular rock-and-roll songwriter? Dylan himself seemed aware of the criticism, and in his unconventional Nobel acceptance speech―a twenty-seven minute spoken word recording accompanied by jazz piano―he tackled the question head on: “When I first received this Nobel Prize for Literature, I got to wondering exactly how my songs related to literature.”1 In the folksy audio-essay that follows, Dylan reflects on his many literary influences, from Buddy Holly and Lead Belly to Don Quixote, Moby Dick, and The Odyssey. Dylan claims that Odysseus, not unlike the heroes of blues ballads, is “a travelin’ man, but he’s making a lot of stops.” For Dylan, songwriters and writers of literature are influenced by the same themes, the same stories: love, loss, violence, suffering, and so on. Although Bob Dylan is not the only musician to reflect on the confluence between music and literature, his Nobel win has sparked renewed","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"282 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45856225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Interview with Sheila Heti","authors":"Michael F. Miller, M. Bailar","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.146","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"94 2","pages":"146 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3368/cl.60.2.146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41291369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Car Culture and Its Trialectics","authors":"M. Krishnan","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.305","url":null,"abstract":"here are few symbols more weighted in the colonialist imaginary than the railway. Invoked with predictable regularity as both an alibi for and indicator of British colonialism in particular, the image of the train has become a ubiquitous metonym for imperialism that simultaneously attempts to efface its foundational and structural violence. Yet the constant recourse to the train as a signifier of colonial modernity has rendered its image overdetermined, verging on cliché. By contrast, Lindsey B. Green-Simms’s Postcolonial Automobility: Car Cul ture in West Africa offers a fresh perspective on the interconnections across infrastructure, modernity, development, and (post)coloniality through its focus on the automobile. As Green-Simms’s study makes plain, the car, while less frequently invoked, is no less central than the train in its importance as a symbol and signifier of the paradoxes and tensions of coloniality and its legacies. The automobile, as Green-Simms notes, serves as “the commodity par excellence of postwar modernity” (3), whose own valuations register specific articulations in the West African context. Centered on the concept of “automobility,” a term intended to evoke both autonomy and mobility (concepts which, as Green-Simms observes, are inherently paradoxical in nature and central to post-Enlightenment notions of the M A D H U K R I S H N A N","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"305 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42128660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rails, Networks, and Novels: Historicizing Infrastructure Space","authors":"Jacob Soule","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.174","url":null,"abstract":"n a recent essay eviscerating the current management, operation, and ownership structures of Britain’s train network, novelist James Meek pauses to observe that contrary to their now decrepit state, “[w]hen they first came along, the railways were more than new. They set the terms by which future new things would be deemed new” (23). It should be no surprise that a novelist would take an interest in the cultural significance of the fate of the railway. After all, trains were as constitutive of nineteenthand early twentieth-century fiction as they were of modernity itself. Augmenting Meek’s comments slightly, we might say that the railway was at once an instigator of historical change and the metaphor in which that change was couched. Novelists gravitated to the world of the railway not just as mere convenient narrative function―getting characters from A to B―but as a literary symbol that stood for the shock-inducing arrival of modernization and modernity onto the terrain of everyday life. Before the US highway system, before international air travel, there was rail transport. In the second half of the nineteenth century the railway was implicated in everything from urbanization and the birth of finance to the logistics of war and imperialist extraction. Its sum achievements, as Schivelbusch argued in his classic study of nineteenth-century railway capitalism, were the homogenization of time and the annihilation of space (40), phenomena we now take J A C O B S O U L E","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"174 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48134536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Institutions, Genres, Readers","authors":"Robert Higney","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.289","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.289","url":null,"abstract":"or years, the central debates in English were over method. The now-familiar terms around which those debates coalesced―surface reading, digital humanities, world literature, literary Darwinism―were united (if not haunted) by an underlying question about the legitimacy of English itself. What claims―to relevance, to funding―could be made by a discipline that couldn’t produce a coherent account of itself? In each case, to varying degrees and in different ways, proponents of new or revised methods looked outside the confines of English proper: to overlooked European theorists, to computational and data analysis, to the biological and neural sciences. They began to ask not only what literature professors should do and how they should do it but, more centrally, whether literary studies could survive at all. Perhaps this was inevitable, given the contexts of the crisis in academic labor and the downward pressure on enrollments within which any discussion of work in the humanities now takes place. Interdisciplinary borrowing as a prop to methodological innovation has a long history in English studies. But now questions about the legitimacy of such borrowing seem inextricable from questions about the discipline’s ability to perpetuate itself, and about its place within the R O B E R T H I G N E Y","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"289 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45956626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Documentary Photo-Poetics of C. D. Wright and Deborah Luster","authors":"Claire Grandy","doi":"10.3368/cl.60.2.253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.60.2.253","url":null,"abstract":"n a 2001 interview, the late poet C. D. Wright described the premise of her collaborative project with photographer Deborah Luster, One Big Self: Prisoners of Louisiana, in flat rejection of aesthetic autonomy: “The popular perception is that art is apart. I insist it is a part of. Something not in dispute is that people in prison are apart from” (“Looking”). Alongside Luster, Wright formally stages a reading practice that discomfits the disinterested gaze. By forcing an imbrication (a part of) between what is usually kept apart, they mobilize a failure of incorporation, an inability to touch or see clearly, as an ethics of non-relation. This is not to resituate an allure of the ineffable within aesthetic experience, but rather to insist that art cannot be read apart from its often mystified methods of production and circulation. The titular “one big self” signifies this complex work of perpetual inclusion of politics, economics, and environment into the apartness of art object and human subject.1","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"60 1","pages":"253 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45401871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}