发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
OI European Group BV v Venezuela
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA041
Ndanga Kamau
{"title":"OI European Group BV v Venezuela","authors":"Ndanga Kamau","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85912671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Good-Faith Rule against Abusing Process by Multiplying Action 反倍增诉讼滥用程序的诚信原则
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa040
Menalco J Solis
{"title":"Good-Faith Rule against Abusing Process by Multiplying Action","authors":"Menalco J Solis","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa040","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Investor-State tribunals are equipped with lis pendens, res judicata, abuse of process, and adverse cost orders to ensure that parties are not twice vexed for the same issue or to minimize the harm from multiplying action. When abuse of process is applied to a parallel or successive arbitration, it is considered whether the later action could have been joined, consolidated or coordinated with an earlier one and whether there is a reasonable basis for bringing a separate action. The good faith question surrounds the accused’s intent or purpose, which can be measured subjectively if there is an intent to harm or objectively in the absence of reasonable basis. Raising the question of abuse thus involves asking whether the accused acted in good faith. But where lis pendens and res judicata do not apply, there is a colorable basis for the claim and sensible grounds for advancing with separate proceedings, the claimant is within right to bring further action. The good faith element of abuse reaches the middle ground between the claimant’s interest in accessing the arbitral forum and the respondent’s interest in being free from vexation.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88318344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State Immunity as a Defense to Resist the Enforcement of ICSID Awards 国家豁免作为抵制执行ICSID裁决的辩护
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa055
A. Bjorklund, Lukas Vanhonnaeker, J. Marcoux
{"title":"State Immunity as a Defense to Resist the Enforcement of ICSID Awards","authors":"A. Bjorklund, Lukas Vanhonnaeker, J. Marcoux","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa055","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86076017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jurisdiction of Tribunals to Settle Intra-EU Investment Treaty Disputes 解决欧盟内部投资条约争端的法庭管辖权
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA048
Julian Scheu, Petyo Nikolov
{"title":"Jurisdiction of Tribunals to Settle Intra-EU Investment Treaty Disputes","authors":"Julian Scheu, Petyo Nikolov","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA048","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The European Court of Justice (ECJ) made a ground-breaking shift away from the current system of investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS) by rendering its judgment in the matter of Achmea v Slovak Republic. However, since March 2018, a large and ever-growing number of investment tribunals have found that the Achmea judgment does not deprive them of arbitral jurisdiction. Against this background, the aim of the present article is to analyse the effects of the Achmea judgment on the jurisdiction of tribunals to settle intra-European Union (EU) investment treaty disputes. By taking due account of the reasoning conducted by the ECJ, the scope of the Achmea jurisprudence will be clarified. It is concluded that the incompatibility of intra-EU ISDS with EU law concerns all intra-EU investment treaties, including article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). On this basis, we ask whether, and to what extent, the applicability of the Achmea judgment is relevant to arbitral jurisdiction. Considering the law applicable to the arbitration agreement, we conclude that International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunals and those seated outside the EU remain competent to settle intra-EU investment disputes. In contrast, the Achmea judgment renders ISDS clauses contained in intra-EU investment treaties inoperable if the tribunal is seated within the EU. The article closes with an outlook that puts these conclusions into perspective by considering recent developments such as the EU Member States’ ratification of a multilateral termination treaty.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41918425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Counterclaims: a Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the 2019 The Hague Resolution of the Institut de Droit International on the ‘Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals’ 反诉:对国际法学会2019年海牙决议第6条“各方在国际投资法庭面前平等”的批判性分析
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-13 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA038
A. M. Steingruber
{"title":"Counterclaims: a Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the 2019 The Hague Resolution of the Institut de Droit International on the ‘Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals’","authors":"A. M. Steingruber","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA038","url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the complex topic of counterclaims in investment arbitration by critically assessing and commenting Article 6 of the 2019 The Hague Resolution of the Institut de Droit International (IDI) on the ‘Equality of Parties before International Investment Tribunals’ paragraph by paragraph.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44336193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Scope of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard in the European Renewable Energy Cases 欧洲可再生能源案例中FET标准下投资者合理预期的范围
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047
Jacklyn Biggs
{"title":"The Scope of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard in the European Renewable Energy Cases","authors":"Jacklyn Biggs","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In the 2000s, several European states sought to increase foreign investment in their renewable energy sectors. Those governments later wound back those financial incentives. This resulted in dozens of investment disputes. One of the key issues in those disputes was whether the decision to amend or withdraw financial incentives breached investors' legitimate expectations under the fair and equitable treatment standard. This article argues that investors' legitimate expectations should operate analogously to the concept of estoppel. Therefore, if a state makes a clear commitment to induce investment (this includes commitments in legislation), and an investor reasonably relies on that commitment, then the state should not be able to renege on that commitment without generating liability for breaching the fair and equitable treatment standard.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44118556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Economic Analysis of the Arbitrator’s Function 仲裁员职能的经济学分析
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAB003
L. Pereira
{"title":"Economic Analysis of the Arbitrator’s Function","authors":"L. Pereira","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAB003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAB003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAB003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46956910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attribution in International Law and Arbitration 国际法与仲裁中的归属
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA051
Ivan Cavdarevic
{"title":"Attribution in International Law and Arbitration","authors":"Ivan Cavdarevic","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78926388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Taking Investors’ Rights Seriously: The Achmea and CETA Rulings of the European Court of Justice do not Bar Intra-EU Investment Arbitration 认真对待投资者权利：欧洲法院的Achmea和CETA裁决不禁止欧盟内部投资仲裁
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI: 10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA044
A. Reuter
{"title":"Taking Investors’ Rights Seriously: The Achmea and CETA Rulings of the European Court of Justice do not Bar Intra-EU Investment Arbitration","authors":"A. Reuter","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA044","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In its 2018 Achmea ruling, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) found intra-European Union (EU) investment arbitration incompatible with EU law, and in its 2019 opinion on the proposed Canada–EU Trade Agreement (CETA), the ECJ has set out requirements for the recognition by the EU of investor–State arbitration at large. On the other hand, in the last few years a great many tribunals (under both International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and non-ICSID regimes) have dealt with intra-EU investment arbitrations, most of them under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). None of these tribunals found the proceedings to be incompatible with EU law.\u0000 The reason for this discrepancy is that the tribunals deal with investors’ rights, while the ECJ, in contrast, is concerned with intra-EU governance issues. However, individual rights are not alien to EU law. Against that background, this note is based on the established finding that investment treaties bestow private investors with individual rights under public international law. These rights need to be taken seriously: as third parties, investors can, under both public international law and EU law, draw upon these rights, irrespective of the internal EU governance rules with which the ECJ was concerned. Hence, this note2 is not meant to be a further contribution to the voluminous debate on the internal EU governance rules drawn upon by the ECJ. In contrast, it is based on the binding effect on the EU of the investors’ individual rights. Furthermore, it shows that the ECJ’s rulings do not have an adverse precedent effect on the pursuit of investors’ rights and that, in addition, the ECT meets the criteria under which the ECJ has assessed EU compatibility of investment arbitration. Last but not least, the denial by EU institutions of investors' rights under the ECT may, in itself, constitute an infringement of the ECT.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45709627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Fight between Interpretation and Modification: A Critique of Sanum v Laos 解读与修改之争——对萨努姆诉老挝案的批判
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siaa024
Yilin Wang
{"title":"The Fight between Interpretation and Modification: A Critique of Sanum v Laos","authors":"Yilin Wang","doi":"10.1093/icsidreview/siaa024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/icsidreview/siaa024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48351333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信