欧洲可再生能源案例中FET标准下投资者合理预期的范围

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Jacklyn Biggs
{"title":"欧洲可再生能源案例中FET标准下投资者合理预期的范围","authors":"Jacklyn Biggs","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the 2000s, several European states sought to increase foreign investment in their renewable energy sectors. Those governments later wound back those financial incentives. This resulted in dozens of investment disputes. One of the key issues in those disputes was whether the decision to amend or withdraw financial incentives breached investors' legitimate expectations under the fair and equitable treatment standard. This article argues that investors' legitimate expectations should operate analogously to the concept of estoppel. Therefore, if a state makes a clear commitment to induce investment (this includes commitments in legislation), and an investor reasonably relies on that commitment, then the state should not be able to renege on that commitment without generating liability for breaching the fair and equitable treatment standard.","PeriodicalId":44986,"journal":{"name":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Scope of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard in the European Renewable Energy Cases\",\"authors\":\"Jacklyn Biggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the 2000s, several European states sought to increase foreign investment in their renewable energy sectors. Those governments later wound back those financial incentives. This resulted in dozens of investment disputes. One of the key issues in those disputes was whether the decision to amend or withdraw financial incentives breached investors' legitimate expectations under the fair and equitable treatment standard. This article argues that investors' legitimate expectations should operate analogously to the concept of estoppel. Therefore, if a state makes a clear commitment to induce investment (this includes commitments in legislation), and an investor reasonably relies on that commitment, then the state should not be able to renege on that commitment without generating liability for breaching the fair and equitable treatment standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icsid Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIAA047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2000年代,几个欧洲国家寻求增加对其可再生能源部门的外国投资。这些政府后来取消了这些财政激励措施。这导致了数十起投资纠纷。这些争议中的一个关键问题是,修改或撤销财务激励措施的决定是否违反了投资者在公平公正待遇标准下的合法期望。本文认为,投资者的合法期望应类似于禁止反悔的概念。因此,如果一个州明确承诺吸引投资(包括立法中的承诺),并且投资者合理地依赖该承诺,那么该州就不能违背该承诺,而不承担违反公平公正待遇标准的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Scope of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations under the FET Standard in the European Renewable Energy Cases
In the 2000s, several European states sought to increase foreign investment in their renewable energy sectors. Those governments later wound back those financial incentives. This resulted in dozens of investment disputes. One of the key issues in those disputes was whether the decision to amend or withdraw financial incentives breached investors' legitimate expectations under the fair and equitable treatment standard. This article argues that investors' legitimate expectations should operate analogously to the concept of estoppel. Therefore, if a state makes a clear commitment to induce investment (this includes commitments in legislation), and an investor reasonably relies on that commitment, then the state should not be able to renege on that commitment without generating liability for breaching the fair and equitable treatment standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信