Solov’evskie issledovaniya最新文献

{"title":"Final «Historical Letters» by V.I. Lamansky (preface to the publication)","authors":"A.V. Malinov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.097-105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.097-105","url":null,"abstract":"The article introduces the publication of the fragments of the sixth “Historical Letter on the Attitude of the Russian People to their Tribesmen” and the conclusion prepared by Vladimir Ivanovich Lamansky, a Slavophile and professor at St. Petersburg University. It is noted that other works of the scientist, on which he worked in the following years, remained unfinished. The facts allowing to indicate the date of writing the “Historical Letters” are given: 1859–1862, work interrupted by Lamansky's trip abroad (1862–1864). It is suggested that the “Historical Letters” were a continuation of the research direction outlined by Lamansky in his master's thesis “On the Slavs in Asia Minor, Africa and Spain” (1859), i.e. they were the result of his archival and desk work. The trip to the Slavic lands enriched the scholar with real knowledge of the Slavic peoples, their history and current situation, which made many of the arguments in the “Historical Letters” irrelevant. There are two subjects that Lamansky touched upon in his “last” letters, and which were further developed in his research and work. Firstly, these are the works in the field of national ethnography: his long-term leadership of the ethnographic department of the Russian Geographical Society, the organisation of the Slavic Congress and the Ethnographic Exhibition in 1867, the publication of the ethnographic journal “Zhivaya starina” (1890), the project of the of the ethnographic department of the Russian Museum (1899). Lamansky's statements on ethnography as fatherland studies or ethnology are presented, revealing his understanding of ethnographic science. Secondly, this is a historiosophical interpretation of the Oriental Question, considering it as an episode of interaction between two civilisations: the Greco-Slavic and the Romano-Germanic. The incompleteness of the “Historical Letters” is pointed out, which is reflected in the gaps in their publication.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139150157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"From Dialogue to Polylogue (review of the book: Comparative Philosophy: From Comparative to Intercultural Philosophy / co-edited by M.T. Stepanyants. Moscow: Nauka; Vost. lit., 2022. 399 p.)","authors":"A.B. Bocharov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.179-193","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.179-193","url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a review of the book “Comparative Philosophy: from comparative to intercultural philosophy”, published in the series “Comparative Philosophy”. The thesis about the value of intercultural philosophy in the context of conceptology is presented. The hypothesis formulated states that intercultural philosophy expands the methodological and theoretical framework of philosophical research and can be evaluated as a frontier phenomenon. It is noted that the main thesis of intercultural philosophy consists in the rejection of West-centrism, in the criticism of the traditional historical and philosophical narrative. It is proposed to consider intercultural philsophy as an alternative to West-centrism, as it rejects the monologism inherent in western philosophy and insists on the polylogicity of philosophy. Intercultural philosophy insists on the rootedness of thinking in culture. He believes that intellectual influences and conceptual borrowings are a natural, normal situation in philosophy. However, borrowing can lead both to the fruitful development of the philosophical tradition, and to the loss of the integrity of culture, a decrease in its creative potential, and the ability to reproduce. Intercultural philosophy is aimed at explication of positive forms of intercultural interaction. It suggests a new model of the historical and philosophical process, the main method of which is a polylogue, although the followers of intercultural philosophy are still debating whether intercultural philosophy is a new direction or a new methodology. Russian philosophy can also be revised and reinterpreted. N.Y. Danilevsky, V.S. Solovyov, Slavophiles, etc. can be considered intercultural thinkers. The methodological basis of the study was the comparative and hermeneutic methods.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139151991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"“Real Deed of an Artist” and Philosophy of Art: Solovyev – Fyodorov – Chekrygin","authors":"E.M. Titarenko","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.132-146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.132-146","url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the aesthetic views of an artist and philosopher V.N. Chekrygin (1897–1922). His ideas are compared to the philosophy of art of V.S. Solovyev and N.F. Fyodorov. Theoretical heritage of the artist is analyzed, it reflects understanding of the tasks of creativity, history and language of the visual art. The research is based on the texts of Chekrygin: “A Manifest of the Painters (1920)”, “The Program of One-year Course on Art Philosophy” (1920), “About Upcoming New Era of the All-European Art” (1921), “About Convocation of the Resurrecting Museum’ (1921), and his epistolary art. Little-known materials from the archive are considered. Studying aesthetic works of Fyodorov and Solovyev allows to make comparative-typological research of the artist and philosopher of art. The connection is shown between Chekrygin’s ideas and aesthetic tradition of the Russian religious philosophy. Signs of aesthetics of Christian universalism can be seen in his project of a new era of the art. The idea of the project of “living art” of Chekrygin is opposed to the research of avantgarde art and it was inspired by the ideas of conciliarity and theurgy. It is shown that philosophical-aesthetic ideas of the artist are close to the philosophy of art of V.S. Solovyov and even more to the doctrine of the aesthetic supramoralism of Fyodorov. The research discloses particularities of the aesthetic ideas of the artist, which are permeated with the spirit of eschatological anxiety. Chekrygin shows the way that modern art should follow referring to the topics of theophany, to the process of contemplation of the space evolvement and the creation of the church-museum of the universal resurrection. It is proved that the artist creates the image of the final ideal of art conceiving the philosophical ideas of Solovyov and Fyodorov. It is proved that the artist remains in line with modernism discourse at the same time creating the outlines of the art of the future.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"1 1‐6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139149241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"“Second after Aquinas ...”: Hans Urs von Balthazar on the Philosophical Aesthetics of V.S. Solovyov","authors":"M. V. Maksimov","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.081-096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.081-096","url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the book by the Swiss philosopher and theologian H.U. von Balthazar “Vladimir Solovyov”, dedicated to the reconstruction and interpretation of the aesthetic teachings of V.S. Solovyov, is presented. The main themes of Balthazar's work are considered, defining its structure in accordance with the author's vision of the main stages of Solovyov's work: “Visionary and textual form”, “Logic and Metaphysics”, “Ethics and Ecclesiology”, “Aesthetics and Apocalypticism”. The author notes the harmony and consistency of Balthazar's concept, the logic of interpretation of the most important provisions of Solovyov's aesthetics, based on the corpus of his writings, as well as on research Russian and foreign literature. The essential characteristics of Balthazar's consideration of the aesthetics of the Russian philosopher are revealed: the disclosure of its ontological, eschatological and theological aspects. The historical and philosophical origins of Solovyov's ideas, parallels and consonances of the conceptual positions of Solovyov's aesthetics and the largest representatives of domestic and foreign philosophy: Plato, Plotinus, Maxim the Confessor, Schelling, Hegel, Schopenhauer, E. von Hartmann are determined. Balthazar's position on Solovyov's teaching about Sophia in the context of сhristological and trinitarian theology is presented. The assessment of the comparison of Solovyov's method of unity with the methods of studying Dilthey's “forms of spirit” and Spengler's “forms of culture” is given. The researcher's attention is noted to the problems of Solovyov's creative dialogue with outstanding Russian thinkers F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, K.N. Leontiev. The conclusions about the significance of the philosophical and theological reconstruction of Solovyov's aesthetics, carried out by Balthazar, for foreign and Russian Solovyov studies are formulated.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"336 6‐7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139152511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Philosophical and aesthetic views of G.V.F. Hegel and V.S. Solovyov: on the question of influence","authors":"A. S. Balabaeva","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.040-055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.040-055","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a comparative analysis of the aesthetic views of G.W.F. Hegel (based on the material of “Lectures on Aesthetics” prepared for publication by H.-G. Goto) and V.S. Solovyov. The presented history of the question of the influence of Hegelian philosophy on Solovyov's work demonstrates the prospects and productivity of research related to the issues of aesthetics of Solovyov and Hegel. In this regard, there is a need to summarize the results of the investigations on this topic, making a number of important clarifications and revealing previously intended points of convergence and divergence of the two philosophers. Both general aesthetic problems (the meaning of beauty in nature, the connection between beauty and the absolute idea) and applied issues of an art and literary nature (justification of the hierarchy of arts, features of lyrical poetry) are considered. A direct and hidden polemic of Solovyov with Hegel's ideas is revealed: the objection to the subjectivity of the perception of beauty in nature, the emphasis on the need to spiritualize substance under the influence of beauty. Clarifying the understanding of the role of art in history by Hegel and Solovyov makes it possible to more clearly trace the grandiose prospects for the development of art in the Russian philosopher, whose concept of theurgic creativity will later be adopted by younger symbolists. Speaking not only as a philosopher, but also as a poet, Solovyov criticizes Hegel's position on lyrical poetry as an expression of the individual subjective consciousness of the artist. It is demonstrated how the Hegelian dialectical method is implemented by Solovyov in characterizing the stages of development of Russian poetry of the XIX century. It is suggested that the dialectic of freedom and necessity was interpreted by Solovyov when presenting the theory of fate as the Providence of God.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139150360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"V. Solovyov’s aesthetic assessments of K.F. Fofanov’s lyrics. Part 3","authors":"E.A. Takho-Godi","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.023-039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.4.023-039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139151631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Who owned the cryptonym E.I.? (On the review by A.A. Blok)","authors":"N. Gryakalova","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.025-042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.025-042","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the circumstances associated with the review of A.A. Blok (“Novyj Put’”, 1903, no. 5), devoted to the book “Gaplights” and Moods” (1903), published under the cryptonym E.I. To date, its author has not been identified. As a result of archival and source studies, the authorship was established: this is E.I. Arsenieva, wife of K.K. Arseniev, a well-known lawyer, literary critic, liberal figure, editor of the journal “Vestnik Evropy”, Solovyov’s correspondent. The article provides biographical information about the Arseniev family, including previously unknown ones. The charitable activities of Arsenieva and her daughter, the organizer of a women's community and a monastery, fit into the context of the social and Christian movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The paper presents information about the literary circle organized by Arsenieva, about its orientation on the spiritual heritage of Soloviev, as well as fragments of her correspondence with P.P. Pertsov and N.M. Minsky, which shed light on the circle of her contacts, as well as on the history of the emergence of Blok's review. In addition Arsenieva’s sketch “The Soul of the Poet-Philosopher (about V.S. Soloviev)” extracted from the book “Gaplights” and Moods” is published.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116111834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"“Hoffman complex” in the stories of Ap. Grigoriev “One of many” and “The other of many”","authors":"V. Koroleva","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.151-168","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.151-168","url":null,"abstract":"The problem of the formation of the “Hoffman text of Russian literature” is considered on the material of the prose heritage of Ap. Grigoriev. In the novels “One of Many” (1846) and “The Other of Many” (1847) by Ap. Grigoriev the main features of Hoffmann poetics are highlighted, which manifest themselves in its entirety and are characterized by the common stylistics of these two authors (“destructive irony”), Grigoriev's appeal to Hoffmann's type of demonic hero (Imeretinov, Zvanintsev), dating back to Hoffmann's novel “Elixirs of the Devil”, as well as similar problems. It is noted that Ap. Grigoriev, following Hoffman, conceptualizes the problem of forcible influence on the personality of another as based on the idea of magnetism. similarities in the authors' treatment of the problem of the necrosis of human life (in Ap. Grigoriev) and the mechanization of life and man (by E.T.A. Hoffman) are noted by means of the example of the images in the stories of Ap. Grigoriev (Zvanintsev, Imeretinov) and the images-symbols of masks, dolls, automatons, puppets of E.T.A. Hoffman’s stories (“The Sandman”, “Automatons”, etc.). And, finally, attention is drawn to the fact that duality as one of the key problems of Hoffman's work is being developed in Grigoriev's novels (the “mirroring” of the twin heroes Zvanintsev – Vertebrae, Sevsky; Imeretinov – Chabrin). The results of the conducted research show a bright layer of Hoffmann intertext in the stories “One of Many” and “The Other of Many” by A. Grigoriev, which allows us to talk about the work of the Russian writer as a significant stage in the formation of the Hoffmann text (“supertext”) of Russian literature.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124152257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Influence of the late works of Vl. Solovyov on A. Kozhev’s philosophy of history","authors":"D.A. Shmelev","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.074-091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.074-091","url":null,"abstract":"The later work of Vladimir Soloviev, more specifically his Three Conversations on War, Progress, and the End of World History, is considered as one of the origins of Alexander Kozhev's philosophy of history. The general characteristics of Kozhev's anthropological and historiosophic views and their comparison with the concept of history presented in Solovyev's Three Conversations are given. The comparative analysis of the views of both philosophers revealed eight conceptual points, which are presented in both historiosophic doctrine of the late Soloviev and in Alexander Kozhev's philosophy of history as well. The attention is drawn to the fact that both French thinker and Russian philosopher believe that post-historical state is characterized by the absence of wars and termination of existence of separate national states, replaced by supranational structures of government, which will later be abolished in favor of a single World Empire, based on radical egalitarianism. It is noted that both philosophers agree that the world after history is an undifferentiated culturally homogeneous space in which an apparent material prosperity coexists with a latent spiritual crisis characterized by primitivization of the man, disappearance of culture, domination of atheism, devaluation of Christian values. The emphasis is placed on the affinity between Kozhev's image of Napoleon and Solovyov's figure of the antichrist, whereas in both cases the question is about a personality who expansively imposes his individuality on the world, a subject who moves humanity by his actions into a posthistorical space by means of the establishment of the Total Empire. The main difference between Kozhev's historiosophical concept and Solovyov's is also considered. It consists in the fact that Kozhev's 'end of History' takes place in a purely secular dimension, while Solovyov, who stands on a religious position, leaves room for messianism. In summary, based on the many considered conceptual coincidences between Solovyov's and Kozhev's doctrines, we conclude the late Solovyov's work has influenced on Kozhev's historiosophy.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116981959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Problem of Verbalization of Living Knowledge in the Philosophy of S.L. Frank","authors":"A. Khamidulin","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.126-139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.126-139","url":null,"abstract":"The article changes the problem of verbalization of living knowledge in the philosophy of S.L. Frank. On the material of philosophical kids. Frank divides into two levels – reality and reality. It is revealed that the Russian philosopher understands the reality as the metaphysical, spiritual level of being with the inclusion of the supernatural world in faith in the concept of meaning, while the key figure of spiritual reality in the philosophy of S.L. Frank is God – the Absolute, possessing both personal and prepersonal izneme. It is distinguished by the presence of its own spiritual experience in S.L. Frank. is revealed from the fact that knowledge of the spiritual reality is possible due to living knowledge, knowledge-experience, the article reveals the ideas of expression, the transfer of living knowledge opened as a result of contact with the spiritual reality. It is noted that the interest of S.L. Frank to the proposed problem is fixed in the work of different years. The methodology of the Possible Verbalization of living knowledge throughout the Whole Frank is analyzed and systematized. It is concluded that according to S.L. For Frank, knowledge about the Absolute as the quintessence of living knowledge is not absolutely inexpressible, however, the verbalization of the strategy still turns out to be limited in the exceptionally strong otherness of the spiritual level of being. It is important that the evaluation of the results of living knowledge is possible thanks to verbalization: with the help of metaphor, apophatic and paradoxical, antinomic method, as well as with the help of poetry that rejects to the Absolute.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125622195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}