发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Bonaventure’s I Sentence Argument for the Trinity from Beatitude in advance 博纳文特尔关于三位一体的“一句话”论证
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-08-12 DOI: 10.5840/acpq2021728234
D. Bray
{"title":"Bonaventure’s I Sentence Argument for the Trinity from Beatitude in advance","authors":"D. Bray","doi":"10.5840/acpq2021728234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021728234","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45181398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Reconsideration of Aquinas’s Fourth Way in advance 对阿奎那第四道的再思考
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI: 10.5840/acpq2021730238
Gaven Kerr
{"title":"A Reconsideration of Aquinas’s Fourth Way in advance","authors":"Gaven Kerr","doi":"10.5840/acpq2021730238","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021730238","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48466136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Domain of Justice and the Extension of Rights: A Reply to Macdonald on Animal Rights in advance 正义的领域与权利的延伸——对麦克唐纳关于动物权利问题的预先回答
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-07-30 DOI: 10.5840/acpq2021729237
W. Diem
{"title":"The Domain of Justice and the Extension of Rights: A Reply to Macdonald on Animal Rights in advance","authors":"W. Diem","doi":"10.5840/acpq2021729237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021729237","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46182095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conscience and Conscientiousness in Linda Zagzebski’s Exemplarist Moral Theory in advance 琳达·扎格布斯基的典范道德理论中的良心与尽责性
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI: 10.5840/acpq2021728235
B. Prusak
{"title":"Conscience and Conscientiousness in Linda Zagzebski’s Exemplarist Moral Theory in advance","authors":"B. Prusak","doi":"10.5840/acpq2021728235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021728235","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45827842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Charity in Interpretation: Principle or Virtue? A Return to Gregory the Great 阐释中的慈善:原则还是美德?《回到格列高利大帝
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI: 10.5840/ACPQ202161226
P. Vandevelde
{"title":"Charity in Interpretation: Principle or Virtue? A Return to Gregory the Great","authors":"P. Vandevelde","doi":"10.5840/ACPQ202161226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACPQ202161226","url":null,"abstract":"I defend the view that charity in interpretation is both an epistemic and a moral virtue. In the first part, I examine Donald Davidson’s version of his principle of charity and question his ascription of beliefs by raising a phenomenological objection: beliefs themselves, before being ascribed, need to be interpreted when interpreters and the subjects they try to understand do not share the same cultural and historical background. In the second section, I examine the notion of epistemic virtue as discussed in virtue epistemology and question whether an epistemic virtue can be completely separated from a moral virtue. In the third section, I show how Gregory the Great, Father of the Church and Pope in the 6th century, understands the virtue of charity in interpretation not as a motivation (in a causal process of interpretation, as in virtue epistemology) but as an attraction to the good (in a teleological process) so that the interpreter is not only a technician producing an interpretation (following a “principle” of charity, as in Davidson) but a moral agent acting in a community.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41819907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
God Without Metaphysics: Some Thomistic Reflections on Heidegger’s Onto-Theological Critique and the Future of Natural Theology 没有形而上学的上帝:对海德格尔本体论批判与自然神学未来的托马斯式反思
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI: 10.5840/acpq2021616233
Justin Gable
{"title":"God Without Metaphysics: Some Thomistic Reflections on Heidegger’s Onto-Theological Critique and the Future of Natural Theology","authors":"Justin Gable","doi":"10.5840/acpq2021616233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2021616233","url":null,"abstract":"The Heideggerian critique of onto-theology has attained a semi-canonical status for continental philosophy of religion. But is the critique itself sound, and does it actually result in a richer philosophical and theological discourse concerning God? In this paper, I argue that Heidegger’s onto-theological critique suffers from serious difficulties. First (section II) I examine the critique, summarizing and condensing the critique in its essentials. I use Westphal’s fourfold criteria as a way of giving it some precision, while presenting it in relative independence from Heidegger’s own account of Being. In section III, I examine the results of non-onto-theological discourse on God post-Heidegger, suggesting, using the examples of John Caputo and Richard Kearney, that Heidegger’s onto-theological critique has not inspired a less problematic religious discourse. In the fourth and final section, I question the legitimacy of the critique itself. While Heidegger’s critique of onto-theology has the seemingly admirable goal of rendering our discourse about God less instrumental and idolatrous, a careful analysis of the criteria themselves reveals that onto-theology either misinterprets natural theological discourse on God or subjects it to impossible requirements.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43838403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Amo, Ergo Cogito: Phenomenology’s Non-Cartesian Augustinianism 阿莫·科吉托：现象学的非笛卡尔奥古斯丁主义
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-06-03 DOI: 10.5840/ACPQ202162229
Chad Engelland
{"title":"Amo, Ergo Cogito: Phenomenology’s Non-Cartesian Augustinianism","authors":"Chad Engelland","doi":"10.5840/ACPQ202162229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACPQ202162229","url":null,"abstract":"Phenomenologists turn to Augustine to remedy the neglect of life, love, and language in the Cartesian cogito: (1) concerning life, Edmund Husserl appropriates Augustine’s analysis of distentio animi, Edith Stein of vivo, and Hannah Arendt of initium; (2) concerning love, Max Scheler appropriates Augustine’s analysis of ordo amoris, Martin Heidegger of curare, and Dietrich von Hildebrand of affectiones; (3) concerning language, Ludwig Wittgenstein appropriates Augustine’s analysis of ostendere, Hans-Georg Gadamer of verbum cordis, and Jean-Luc Marion of confessio. Phenomenology’s non-Cartesian Augustinianism can tell us something about phenomenology, namely that it is engaged in the project of recontextualizing the cogito, and something about Augustine, namely how radically different his project is than Descartes’s. Phenomenology presents an Augustine that is well positioned for the debates of our times concerning mind and world, desire and the human person, and language and embodiment.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49054070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism 思想主义与当代现象现实主义
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI: 10.5840/ACPQ2021526225
Richard J. Colledge
{"title":"Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism","authors":"Richard J. Colledge","doi":"10.5840/ACPQ2021526225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACPQ2021526225","url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks to make a small contribution to the critical engagement between philosophical Thomism and phenomenology, inspired by the recent work of the German phenomenologist and hermeneutic thinker Günter Figal. My suggestion is that Figal’s proposal for a broad-based hermeneutical philosophy rooted in a renewed realism concerning things in their externality and “objectivity” provides great potential for a renewed encounter with Thomist realism. The paper takes up this issue through a brief examination of some of the more problematic idealistic features of Kantian and Husserlian thought, before turning to consider how these aspects of the tradition are reframed within Figal’s phenomenological realism. The Thomist position concerning the relation between things and their understanding (including the complex matter of the verbum mentis) is then raised, drawing both on Aquinas’s own texts and the interpretations of Jacques Maritain. Some striking emerging affinities between this tradition and Figal’s hermeneutic phenomenology are noted.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49489372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individuation, Identity, and Resurrection in Thomas Jackson and John Locke 托马斯·杰克逊和约翰·洛克的个人化、身份认同与复活
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI: 10.5840/ACPQ202147222
Jon W. Thompson
{"title":"Individuation, Identity, and Resurrection in Thomas Jackson and John Locke","authors":"Jon W. Thompson","doi":"10.5840/ACPQ202147222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACPQ202147222","url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the views of two 17th century thinkers (Thomas Jackson and John Locke) on the question of the metaphysics of resurrection. I show that Jackson and Locke each depart from central 17th century Scholastic convictions regarding resurrection and philosophical anthropology (convictions laid out in section II). Each holds that matter or material continuity is not a plausible principle of diachronic individuation for living bodies such as human beings. Despite their rejection of the traditional view, they each provide a defence of the possibility of a personal afterlife. I outline these (quite different) defences in sections III–IV. I then argue (section V) that it is likely either that Locke had read Jackson on the issue of resurrection or that the two were influenced by a common source. I argue that matter might provide a suitable principle of diachronic individuation in both everyday cases of living bodies and in the case of resurrection.","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46495063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Thomistic Thoughts About Thought and Talk 关于思想和谈话的托马斯主义思想
IF 0.2 4区 哲学
AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2021-02-23 DOI: 10.5840/ACPQ20219511
N. Austriaco
{"title":"Thomistic Thoughts About Thought and Talk","authors":"N. Austriaco","doi":"10.5840/ACPQ20219511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/ACPQ20219511","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p />","PeriodicalId":44497,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48588601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信