{"title":"A framework for analyzing evaluative language in historical discourse","authors":"Gordon Myskow","doi":"10.1075/FOL.15053.MYS","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.15053.MYS","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 History texts are not just disciplinary artefacts for describing, explaining or making arguments about the past. They play a key\u0000 role in defining present-day group identities and their terms of affiliation. As such, they have generated a great deal of\u0000 interest among functional linguists interested in how ideology is construed through language. But the ways history texts evaluate\u0000 the past is not straightforward; they include a complex interplay of discourse participants putting forward a range of views\u0000 toward the subject-matter. This article presents a framework for investigating evaluative meaning in historical discourse that\u0000 aims to untangle this complex web of voices, showing how they work together to position readers to take up particular views toward\u0000 the past. The framework brings together two prominent approaches to the study of evaluation: Martin & White’s (2005) Appraisal framework and Hunston’s (2000)\u0000 notions of Status Value and Relevance. It posits four levels of evaluation (inter-, super-, extra- and meta-evaluation) that are\u0000 grounded in insights from the field of historiography and reflect key disciplinary activities of historians.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47306278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}