Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki最新文献

К юбилею Владимира Натановича Поруса 到弗拉基米尔·纳塔诺维奇·普鲁斯的结婚纪念日

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/eps202360451

引用次数: 0

Памяти Александра Леонидовича Никифорова (28.04.1940 —29.09.2023) 纪念亚历山大-尼基福罗夫（1940 年 4 月 28 日-2023 年 9 月 29 日）

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.5840/eps202360469

引用次数: 0

Bacon’s Metaphysical Method 培根的形而上学方法

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158340

D. Garber

引用次数: 1

The Baconian Background of Hogben’s Scientific Humanism 何本科学人文主义的培根背景

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158351

B. Aray

引用次数: 0

The Prophetic Bacon 先知培根

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158345

S. Fuller

{"title":"The Prophetic Bacon","authors":"S. Fuller","doi":"10.5840/eps202158345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158345","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is both a reflection on Francis Bacon’s social epistemology and a meta-reflection on how we should be think about historical figures such as Bacon, who are of continuing philosophical, scientific and even political relevance. The impetus for this paper is provided by Daniel Garber’s ‘Bacon’s Metaphysical Method’, which depicts Bacon as making various moves in the scholastic debates of his time. In contrast, I draw two sorts of conclusions: (1) At the historiographical level, I argue against the sort of ‘contextualism’ that artificially constrains the ‘transcendental’ horizons of a thinker such as Bacon, who was clearly addressing not simply his immediate contemporaries but perhaps more importantly, some future readers whose identities he cannot know. What is sometimes called the ‘conversation of mankind’ has just this rather odd communicative character. (2) At the more substantive philosophical level, it is clear that Bacon does not have a conception of knowledge as a kind of (justified) belief at all. On the contrary, knowledge is the product of a process that is largely conducted by humans on humans, very much in the spirit of a judicial inquisition. In this context, humans – no less than the technologies normally found in laboratories – are instruments of knowledge production. Here Bacon presages the c19-c20 ideas of media as the ‘extension of the senses’ and Karl Popper’s World 3.","PeriodicalId":44031,"journal":{"name":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45506213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

On Metaphysics and Method, Or How to Read Francis Bacon’s Novum organum 论形而上学与方法，或如何解读培根的《新事物》

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158347

Dana Jalobeanu

{"title":"On Metaphysics and Method, Or How to Read Francis Bacon’s Novum organum","authors":"Dana Jalobeanu","doi":"10.5840/eps202158347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158347","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to offer a preliminary survey of one of the most widely discussed problems in Bacon’s studies: the problem of the interplay between the speculative (i.e., metaphysical) and operative (i.e., methodological) layers of Bacon’s works. I propose to classify the various answers in three categories. In the first category I place attempts claiming that Bacon’s inquiries display his appetitive metaphysics. In the second category are those seeing Bacon’s more “scientific” works as disclosing some of the inner metaphysical layers and presuppositions. The third category see Bacon’s experimental inquiries as attempts to “fix” metaphysics, by redefining concepts of metaphysical origins. In discussing these three categories of interpretative stances I show that we can gain further insights if we take into account recent and less recent trends in philosophy of science, and especially if we think in terms of background theory and bottom-up strategies of concept formation. I offer examples of such procedures in Bacon’s natural and experimental histories and show what we can gain if we apply the same interpretative strategy of focusing on concept-formation to the reading of the Novum organum.","PeriodicalId":44031,"journal":{"name":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43518381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Language of Reality and Reality of Language in Francis Bacon’s Philosophy 现实的语言与培根哲学中的语言现实

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158348

N. A. Osminskaya

引用次数: 0

Francis Bacon and His Fate in the History and Philosophy of Science, 2010–2020 弗朗西斯·培根及其在科学史和科学哲学中的命运，2010-2020

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158353

Doina‐Cristina Rusu

{"title":"Francis Bacon and His Fate in the History and Philosophy of Science, 2010–2020","authors":"Doina‐Cristina Rusu","doi":"10.5840/eps202158353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158353","url":null,"abstract":"In this review I analyse new trends in Bacon-scholarship over the last decade. Bacon’s role in the history and philosophy of science has been the topic of debate since the second half of the seventeenth century. Scholars took him to be either a key figure in the emergence of experimental sciences, or the opposite of what science is supposed to be. However, most of these bold claims were based on distortions and misunderstandings of Bacon’s programme. Starting in the last couple of decades of the twentieth century, several studies offered a more nuanced account of Bacon’s philosophy and tried to refute some of the ‘unsound criticisms’. Moreover, over the last decade, we can notice a tendency to focus on Bacon’s more practical works, and not only on the more theoretical ones. In the context of these practical works, I identified several new trends: the role of the natural and experimental histories in the overall project of the Great Instauration, and their relation with natural philosophy; the function of mathematics and quantification; the employment of instruments and other devices to overcome the shortcomings of both the senses and the minds; the scientific methodology with an emphasis on the relation between theory and experiments, and the use of exploratory experiments; and finally Bacon’s use of sources and his influence on later early modern authors. As opposed to the idea that Bacon was interested either in collecting random facts or in inventing experimental reports to present his speculative ideas, Bacon is lately portrayed as a careful experimenter, meticulous in writing reports, ingenious in designing instruments and new experiments, and critical towards his own conceptions.","PeriodicalId":44031,"journal":{"name":"Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42719698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Responses to Cassan, Iorizzo, Belkind, Lynch and Fuller 对Cassan、Iorizzo、Belkind、Lynch和Fuller的回应

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158346

Daniel Garber

引用次数: 0

Francis Bacon, Between Myth and History 弗朗西斯·培根，在神话与历史之间

IF 0.4

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI: 10.5840/eps202158339

D. Drozdova

引用次数: 0