Science Editing最新文献_第7页

Scopus, cOAlition S, and Crossref’s views on scholarly publishing in the next 10 years Scopus、cOAlition S和Crossref对未来10年学术出版的看法

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.267

T. Seo

引用次数: 0

Increased number of Scopus articles from Indonesia from 1945 to 2020, an analysis of international collaboration, and a comparison with other ASEAN countries from 2016 to 2020 增加了1945年至2020年印度尼西亚Scopus文章的数量，对国际合作的分析，以及2016年至2020年与其他东盟国家的比较

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.265

Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, S. Suryanto, S. Ningrum, I. Widianingsih, Y. Rianto

引用次数: 2

Metaverse in journal publishing 期刊出版中的虚拟世界

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.256

Kihong Kim

引用次数: 4

Diplomacy in six patterns of reviewers’ queries during manuscript revision in scholarly publishing 学术出版中审稿人六种提问模式的外交性

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.264

J. Iwaz

引用次数: 0

The opinions of Indian dental faculty members on harmonizing manuscript preparation and the submission guidelines of journals 印度牙科教师对协调稿件准备和期刊提交指南的意见

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.258

Gadde Praveen, Harsha Gvd, Swati G Naidu, Dharani Asd

{"title":"The opinions of Indian dental faculty members on harmonizing manuscript preparation and the submission guidelines of journals","authors":"Gadde Praveen, Harsha Gvd, Swati G Naidu, Dharani Asd","doi":"10.6087/kcse.258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.258","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Authors of scholarly writing are underrepresented in discussions about improving the academic publishing system. The objective of this study was to assess the possibility of harmonizing manuscript preparation and the submission guidelines of journals by assessing the opinions of dental faculty members who worked in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India.Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1,286 participants from 16 dental schools in Andhra Pradesh was conducted from March 15, 2021 to April 15, 2021. The questionnaire addressed the participants’ demographic details and perspectives on the guidelines for manuscript preparation and the need to harmonize those guidelines with the publication process. The online questionnaire was generated using Google Forms and consisted of six dichotomous, one multiple-choice, and seven Likert scale items. Descriptive statistics were obtained.Results: Of the 894 (69.5%) dental faculty members who responded, 448 (50.1%) were not aware of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ guidelines for manuscript preparation and submission. During the manuscript revision process, 792 (95.5%) had experienced difficulty with the variation in author guidelines for each journal, especially the guidelines for formatting tables, reference style, and citation of references in-text. The idea of a standardized template for manuscript preparation and submission was supported by 800 respondents (86.7%).Conclusion: Dental faculty members in India experienced difficulty in manuscript preparation for medical journals due to the differing editorial policies among journals. Therefore, a standardized template providing uniformity in style and format is needed.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2022-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48000758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Events in 2022 2022年的活动

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.271

引用次数: 2

PubMed Central as a platform for the survival of open-access biomedical society journals published in Korea PubMed Central是韩国出版的开放获取生物医学社会期刊的生存平台

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.247

Sun Huh

{"title":"PubMed Central as a platform for the survival of open-access biomedical society journals published in Korea","authors":"Sun Huh","doi":"10.6087/kcse.247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.247","url":null,"abstract":"Twenty-one years have passed since PubMed Central (PMC) launched. The present case study describes Korean editors’ history of participation in PMC and their contributions to PMC. The three main turning points in the history of Korean editors’ involvement with PMC were as follows: first, the production of PMC XML files and deposition starting in 2008; second, thorough evaluations of applying journals since 2014; and third, the feasibility of non-English journals being indexed in PMC starting in 2019. The importance of PMC is further shown by the fact that KoreaMed Synapse, a full-text XML database of biomedical journals in Korea that was launched in 2007, was created by benchmarking PMC. Scholarly societies or institutes publish 724 (34.2%) of the 2,119 PMC journals without embargo in June 2021. Out of those 724 journals, 127 (17.5%) are published in Korea. PMC has helped local journals receive more citations from researchers worldwide, increasing their likelihood of being indexed in international databases. The number of submissions from international researchers has increased, thereby making it possible for journals to achieve international diversity. As the best full-text platform of biomedical journals, PMC has provided an excellent opportunity for biomedical journal editors in Korea to change their journals’ language to English and produce full-text JATS (Journal Article Tag Suite) XML files. These factors have made Korea the second-ranked country in terms of no-embargo PMC journals published by academic societies or institutes.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44439891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Participation Reports help Crossref members drive research further 参与报告帮助Crossref成员进一步推动研究

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.253

Anna Tolwinska

{"title":"Participation Reports help Crossref members drive research further","authors":"Anna Tolwinska","doi":"10.6087/kcse.253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.253","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to explain the key metadata elements listed in Participation Reports, why it’s important to check them regularly, and how Crossref members can improve their scores. Crossref members register a lot of metadata in Crossref. That metadata is machine-readable, standardized, and then shared across discovery services and author tools. This is important because richer metadata makes content more discoverable and useful to the scholarly community. It’s not always easy to know what metadata Crossref members register in Crossref. This is why Crossref created an easy-to-use tool called Participation Reports to show editors, and researchers the key metadata elements Crossref members register to make their content more useful. The key metadata elements include references and whether they are set to open, ORCID iDs, funding information, Crossmark metadata, licenses, full-text URLs for text-mining, and Similarity Check indexing, as well as abstracts. ROR IDs (Research Organization Registry Identifiers), that identify institutions will be added in the future. This data was always available through the Crossref ’s REST API (Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface) but is now visualized in Participation Reports. To improve scores, editors should encourage authors to submit ORCIDs in their manuscripts and publishers should register as much metadata as possible to help drive research further.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49091753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

2021 Council of Science Editors annual meeting 2021年科学编辑理事会年会

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.252

Kihong Kim

引用次数: 0

Academic research during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后的学术研究

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.245

Kihong Kim

引用次数: 0