Science Editing最新文献_第10页

Korean editors’ and researchers’ experiences with preprints and attitudes towards preprint policies 韩国编辑和研究人员对预印本的经验和对预印本政策的态度

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.223

H. Yi, Sun Huh

{"title":"Korean editors’ and researchers’ experiences with preprints and attitudes towards preprint policies","authors":"H. Yi, Sun Huh","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.223","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigated editors’ and researcher’s experiences with preprints and their attitudes towards preprint policies in Korea. Methods: From December 30, 2019 to January 10, 2020, a Google Forms survey was mailed to members of the Korean Council of Science Editors and the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies. The 16 survey items included two demographic items, six items on experience with preprints, five 5-point Likert-scale items on attitudes towards preprints, and three items on advantages and disadvantages. Results: Out of 365 respondents, 56 had deposited their manuscripts on preprint servers, while 49 stated that they allowed preprints in their journals. More than half of the respondents expressed favorable attitudes towards prioritizing preprint deposition, promotion of open access, rapid feedback on preprints, earlier citations, and evidence of research work. Responders in engineering had more experience with the concept of preprints, and were more likely to have heard about preprint servers and preprint deposition by other researchers, than those in medicine. Half of the editors disagreed with the need for preprints, for reasons including a lack of scientific integrity, stealing ideas/scooping data, priority issues regarding research ideas, and copyright problems. Conclusion: The above results showed that preprints are still not actively used in Korea. Although experiences with preprints were not widespread, more than half of the respondents showed favorable attitudes towards preprints. More of a consensus should emerge for preprint policies to be accepted by editors in Korea.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44251681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021 2021年1月，韩国作者基于科学核心收藏网的新冠肺炎机构、来源期刊和关键词网络

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.229

K. Kim, G. Jeong

{"title":"Network of institutions, source journals, and keywords on COVID-19 by Korean authors based on the Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021","authors":"K. Kim, G. Jeong","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.229","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to characterize the network of institutions, journals, and topics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) literature by Korean authors in the Web of Science Core Collection The specific goals were to identify the collaborative relationships between Korean authors and international authors and to explore clusters of institutions, journals, and topics Methods: Literature was searched in the Web of Science Core Collection on January 30, 2021 The search terms were \"SARS-CoV-2\" or \"COVID\" or \"novel coronavirus\" in the subject field The search results were limited again to \"South Korea\" as the country and the publication type of \"article \" The measurement tool was Biblioshiny, an app version tool for Bibliometrix Results: Korean authors published 3 2 times more COVID-19-related articles in journals outside of Korea than in Korean journals The journals showed three clusters by bibliographic coupling In contrast, the co-citation network showed four clusters Only a few journals were included in the clusters in both analyses The conceptual structure of Keywords Plus by factorial analysis showed two clusters: \"pathology and clinical treatment\" and \"knowledge and attitudes \" Institutions' collaborative network consisted of four clusters Korean researchers actively collaborated with international researchers, especially those in the United States Conclusion: Because only a few Korean journals were included in the journal clusters by both coupling and co-citation network, more active citation of Korean journals is recommended The identification of human behavior as a distinct theme in COVID-19 research suggests a different focus in this area besides clinical studies","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42086251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Events in 2021 2021年的活动

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.242

引用次数: 3

Manuscript Exchange Common Approach and Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) compatibility: a case study utilizing the JATS Compatibility Meta Model 手稿交换通用方法和期刊文章标签套件（JATS）兼容性：利用JATS兼容性元模型的案例研究

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.235

Laura Randall, Sally Ubnoske

{"title":"Manuscript Exchange Common Approach and Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) compatibility: a case study utilizing the JATS Compatibility Meta Model","authors":"Laura Randall, Sally Ubnoske","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.235","url":null,"abstract":"The National Information Standards Organization (NISO) Manuscript Exchange Common Approach (MECA) project is a cross-organization industry initiative to develop a common approach to manuscript transfer that can be adopted across the scholarly publishing industry. MECA establishes a vocabulary set that includes transfer, review, and manifest models. These models are designed to work with different article XML schemas, including the latest NISO Journal Article Tag Suite (JATS) standard (v1.2). In order to avoid conflicts between these project vocabularies and the JATS, we reviewed the MECA vocabularies against the NISO JATS Compatibility Meta Model (v0.7). This paper describes the review and analysis of the MECA schemas against the JATS Meta Model, how we documented the analysis, and the recommendations we made to resolve issues revealed by the analysis. It includes the documentation we produced to communicate the results of the analysis and what actions we took to move forward with the project, including both changes to the schemas and requests for changes in the JATS. We hope sharing our experiences with this process will help others who are trying to do the same.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46461877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Restriction of some datasets from open access repositories 开放存取存储库中某些数据集的限制

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/kcse.243

引用次数: 0

Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports 期刊引文报告中期刊和文章的开放获取状态

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.226

Sang-Jun Kim, K. Park

{"title":"Open access status of journals and articles in Journal Citation Reports","authors":"Sang-Jun Kim, K. Park","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.226","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: There is somewhat of a difference between understanding the open access (OA) concept and practicing it by stakeholders. OA articles are mainly published by gold and hybrid OA journals, but the OA status may be confusing depending on the target databases. This study investigated the OA status of journals and articles and evaluated the extent to which OA2020 (publishing 90% of articles as OA) was achieved. Methods: This study collected OA data by combining 2014-2019 data from Journal Citation Reports at the journal level with Web of Science at the article level. Finally, 12,449 journals were analyzed focusing on gold and hybrid OA journals, and progress towards the goal of OA2020 was evaluated. Results: Even though 80.4% of Journal Citation Reports journals were gold and hybrid OA journals, only 20.9% of the articles were OA (gold OA journals, 16.6%; hybrid journals, 4.3%). The compound annual growth rate of the total articles was 4.7%, that of OA articles was 16.4%, and that of subscription articles was only 1.7%. Among the subscription journals, 77.4% had shifted to become hybrid journals, but only 5.2% of their articles were OA. Therefore, the hybrid journals were at the very early stage of OA publishing. Conclusion: Considerable progress must still be made to achieve the goal of OA2020. The influence of OA publishing will eventually expand and therefore, librarians should take interest in OA publishing for the library services.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46466576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Presidential address: the Korean Council of Science Editors as a board member of Crossref from March 2021 to February 2024 总统讲话:韩国科学编辑协议会将于2021年3月至2024年2月担任Crossref理事会成员

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.222

Sun Huh

引用次数: 1

Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports 期刊引文报告中开放获取期刊对研究界的影响

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.227

Sang-Jun Kim, K. Park

{"title":"Influence of open access journals on the research community in Journal Citation Reports","authors":"Sang-Jun Kim, K. Park","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.227","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The number of open access (OA) journals is rapidly increasing, and it is very important for librarians to understand the influence of OA journals on the research community. This study investigated the influence of the OA journals listed in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) based on various indicators. Methods: The data for this study were prepared by combining the JCR 2014 to 2019 journal list with the number of hybrid OA articles obtained by searching the Web of Science. Each journal’s JCR indicators and article processing charge were added. The influence of OA journals was compared according to OA type, whether they were published by large publishers, and whether they were top gold OA journals. Results: Gold OA journals remained weaker in terms of JCR indicators than hybrid journals. However, the top 20 gold OA journals, accounting for 27.0% of all OA articles in JCR 2014 to 2019, were superior in all JCR indicators. The top three OA publishers (MDPI, BioMed Central, and Public Library of Science) showed potential for development despite concerns regarding poor journals. The top three subscription publishers were very active in OA publishing, but their actual share of hybrid OA articles (Elsevier, 5.1%; Springer, 10.1%; and Wiley, 12.4% in JCR 2019) was still insufficient. Conclusion: Some gold OA journals showed high competitiveness and even the possibility for development beyond traditional journals. The transition of subscription journals to hybrid journals was found to be at the early stage. In light of these findings, librarians should continue monitoring the influence of OA journals.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42300376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Was the number of submissions to scholarly journals in Korea affected by the COVID-19 pandemic? 新冠疫情对国内学术期刊投稿量有影响吗?

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.239

Sun Huh

引用次数: 3

Korean court cases regarding research and publication ethics from 2009 to 2020 从2009年到2020年，韩国法院审理的研究和出版伦理案件

IF 1.5

Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-02-20 DOI: 10.6087/KCSE.236

J. Y. Lee

{"title":"Korean court cases regarding research and publication ethics from 2009 to 2020","authors":"J. Y. Lee","doi":"10.6087/KCSE.236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.236","url":null,"abstract":"Research and publication misconduct may occur in various forms, including author misrepresentation, plagiarism, and data fabrication. Research and publication ethics are essentially not legal duties, but ethical obligations. In reality, however, legal disputes arise over whether research and publication ethics have been violated. Thus, in many cases, misconduct in research and publication is determined in the courts. This article presents noteworthy legal cases in Korea regarding research and publication ethics to help editors and authors prevent ethical misconduct. Legal cases from 2009 to 2020 were collected from the database of the Supreme Court of Korea in December 2020. These court cases represent three case types: 1) civil cases, such as affirmation of nullity of dismissal and damages; 2) criminal cases, such as fraud, interference with business, and violations of copyright law; and 3) administrative cases related to disciplinary measures against professors affiliated with a university. These cases show that although research and publication ethics are ethical norms that are autonomously established by the relevant academic societies, they become a criterion for case resolution in legal disputes where research and publication misconduct is at issue.","PeriodicalId":43802,"journal":{"name":"Science Editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2021-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42160796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0