Statute Law Review最新文献_第5页

Effectiveness Does Not Always Equate to Legislative Quality: The Case of the 15th Parliamentary Term in Greece 有效性并不总是等同于立法质量:以希腊第15届议会任期为例

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmad001

Ioannis Primpas

{"title":"Effectiveness Does Not Always Equate to Legislative Quality: The Case of the 15th Parliamentary Term in Greece","authors":"Ioannis Primpas","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmad001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmad001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In the scientific debate about what quality means in legislation, the opinion has spread that legislation of good quality is synonymous with effective legislation. This article discusses that effectiveness does not always equate to legislative quality. The example of the 15th parliamentary term in Greece, amid the acute debt crisis, is typical. The most intense and numerous phenomena of ‘bad’, unconstitutional law-making in recent Greek parliamentary history were observed during this term. Nevertheless, the effects of this kind of legislation were remarkably positive since all the indicators of the Greek economy improved spectacularly. Yet, anti-democratic legislation is not qualitative legislation; even an authoritarian regime can enact effective laws. In a democratic rule of law, however, the law-making processes, the content, and the form of drafts must follow the Constitution and the Standing Orders of the Parliament; the legislature is obliged to produce law by the law. Particularly adherence to the prescribed procedures is of vital importance, as it functions as a guarantee of achieving good legislative quality. After all, no one can foresee the best quality content at the start of the legislative process since it is formed after creative fermentation and balancing of tendencies while following the prescribed procedures.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45765656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Parliament and the Law, Third Edition, Hart Studies in Constitutional Law 《议会与法律》，第三版，哈特宪法研究

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac018

Daniel Greenberg

引用次数: 0

Legal Gaps: Concept, Content, Problems of the Role of Legal Doctrine in Overcoming them 法律空白：概念、内容、法律学说在克服法律空白中的作用问题

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac016

A. Kostruba, Mykola Haliantych, Svitlana Iskra, Andrii Dryshliuk

引用次数: 1

Correction to: Statute, Common Law, and Analogical Reasoning: Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters 修正:成文法、普通法和类比推理:翻云覆雨

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac015

引用次数: 0

COVID-19 Stay at Home Restrictions and the Interpretation of Emergency Powers: A Comparative Analysis COVID-19居家限制与紧急权力解释:比较分析

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2022-11-15 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac012

Bruce Chen

{"title":"COVID-19 Stay at Home Restrictions and the Interpretation of Emergency Powers: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Bruce Chen","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmac012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmac012","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has created immense challenges for governments in their management of the public health response and tested the limits of public law. This article undertakes a comparative analysis of the common law jurisdictions of the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia. It discusses the imposition of ‘stay at home’ restrictions pursuant to public health legislative frameworks, focusing on judicial scrutiny in the context of statutory interpretation. It examines the appellate cases of R (Dolan) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] 1 WLR 2326, Borrowdale v Director-General of Health [2022] 2 NZLR 356, and Kassam v Hazzard (2021) 106 NSWLR 520. Using these case studies, this article seeks to reveal key themes and implications for public law. What approaches have the courts adopted to construe public health emergency powers? How have the courts treated ‘rights-based’ principles of statutory interpretation? Have the courts approached interpretation in the usual manner or displayed an unorthodox level of deference to other branches of government? The article concludes on what implications the judicial approaches have for the interpretation of emergency powers in the future.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138542076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Secret Law 秘密法

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac008

D. Greenberg

引用次数: 0

Retraction to: Preventing and Combating Corruption in the European Union: The Practice of Member States 撤回：欧洲联盟预防和打击腐败：成员国的做法

IF 0.3

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-23 DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac007

M. Dei, Iryna S. Skliar, Anatolii Shevchenko, Andriy P. Cherneha, O. V. Tavolzhanskyi

引用次数: 0

Learning the Ropes of Tatparya: Revival of the Mimansa Rules of Interpretation 学习Tatparya的绳索:米曼萨解释规则的复兴