{"title":"《议会与法律》,第三版,哈特宪法研究","authors":"Daniel Greenberg","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is another useful volume in a highly useful series. It is particularly helpful to have a discussion of privilege, exclusive cognizance, and the law by a senior clerk, Eve Samson. Having the inside view set down on the page is a useful resource. It would have been good to have a little more on the latest proposals to enforce contempt of parliament, because an unenforceable privilege risks a cycle of inevitable moribundity. That apart, this is an enormously valuable contribution even if there is the occasional comment that is not necessarily the final word on the matter (e.g. ‘The courts and parliament will always have a strained relationship’ is not necessarily the characterization that everybody would attribute—there will always be an inevitably constructive tension keeping the three parts of the separation of powers in their places, but ‘strain’ implies a degree of conflict that is not necessarily either inevitable or desirable).","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":"263 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parliament and the Law, Third Edition, Hart Studies in Constitutional Law\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/slr/hmac018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is another useful volume in a highly useful series. It is particularly helpful to have a discussion of privilege, exclusive cognizance, and the law by a senior clerk, Eve Samson. Having the inside view set down on the page is a useful resource. It would have been good to have a little more on the latest proposals to enforce contempt of parliament, because an unenforceable privilege risks a cycle of inevitable moribundity. That apart, this is an enormously valuable contribution even if there is the occasional comment that is not necessarily the final word on the matter (e.g. ‘The courts and parliament will always have a strained relationship’ is not necessarily the characterization that everybody would attribute—there will always be an inevitably constructive tension keeping the three parts of the separation of powers in their places, but ‘strain’ implies a degree of conflict that is not necessarily either inevitable or desirable).\",\"PeriodicalId\":43737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"volume\":\"263 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmac018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmac018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parliament and the Law, Third Edition, Hart Studies in Constitutional Law
This is another useful volume in a highly useful series. It is particularly helpful to have a discussion of privilege, exclusive cognizance, and the law by a senior clerk, Eve Samson. Having the inside view set down on the page is a useful resource. It would have been good to have a little more on the latest proposals to enforce contempt of parliament, because an unenforceable privilege risks a cycle of inevitable moribundity. That apart, this is an enormously valuable contribution even if there is the occasional comment that is not necessarily the final word on the matter (e.g. ‘The courts and parliament will always have a strained relationship’ is not necessarily the characterization that everybody would attribute—there will always be an inevitably constructive tension keeping the three parts of the separation of powers in their places, but ‘strain’ implies a degree of conflict that is not necessarily either inevitable or desirable).
期刊介绍:
The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.