European Review of Private Law最新文献_第10页

On Some Enquiries Into Rebalancing Values in Rules 关于规则中再平衡值的若干问题

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020071

M. Storme

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Anna Nylund & Magne Strandberg (eds), Civil Procedure and Harmonization of Law. The Dynamics of EU and International Treaties 书评：Anna Nylund和Magne Strandberg（编辑），《民事诉讼与法律协调》。欧盟与国际条约的动态

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020078

J. Werbrouck

引用次数: 0

Personalized Unfair Terms Control: EU Law Meets Innovative US Doctrines 个性化不公平条款控制：欧盟法律符合美国创新理念

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020075

F. Patti

{"title":"Personalized Unfair Terms Control: EU Law Meets Innovative US Doctrines","authors":"F. Patti","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020075","url":null,"abstract":"According to part of the US scholarship, the use of big data and prediction algorithms could entail a paradigmatic change in contract law: No longer would one have general and abstract legal norms, but rather granular and personalized ones, customized on the needs and features of the contracting parties. This shift to a law tailored to specific individuals could affect both default and mandatory rules and provide for a more efficient and just legal system. The argument goes that such a flexible and technology-driven regulation is also capable of addressing the issue of unfair personalized pricing schemes applied by businesses in online transactions. The present contribution adopts a futuristic approach and investigates whether these doctrinal proposals could possibly pave the way for an amendment of the Directive 93/13 on unfair terms in consumer contracts. In doing so, the main elements of the unfair terms control are highlighted, together with their link with national default rules, which serve both as a benchmark for the assessment of the unfair character of the clause and as gap-fillers. Based on a comparison with the findings of US scholars, it then explores how the unfair terms control may change in order to reduce cross-subsidies to a minimum and tackle discriminatory pricing schemes. Finally, this article elaborates further on how the modifications could be implemented within a new enforcement mechanism, using a technology that would also cover so-called smart contracts.\u0000personalization, unfair terms control, big data, consumer contracts. Motsclés: Personnalisation, Contrôle de clauses abusives, Grandes bases de données, Contrats conclus avec les consommateurs Schlüsselwörter: Personalisierung, Kontrolle missbräuchlicher Klauseln, Big Data, Verbraucherverträge","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42048120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Principle of Transparency in Practice: How Different Groups of Stakeholders View EU Online Information Obligations 实践中的透明度原则:不同利益相关者群体如何看待欧盟在线信息义务

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020063

Alexander J. Wulf, O. Seizov

{"title":"The Principle of Transparency in Practice: How Different Groups of Stakeholders View EU Online Information Obligations","authors":"Alexander J. Wulf, O. Seizov","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020063","url":null,"abstract":"Online information obligations have come under heavy criticism, among other things because they are felt to be too numerous, too long, and insufficiently transparent. To date, empirical research on online disclosures employed quantitative research designs that were restricted to a consumer-centric perspective in pre-contract conclusion scenarios. The aim of this article is to add to our understanding of online information disclosures in Europe by investigating them from multiple perspectives. We report on how the most relevant stakeholders inGermany, the largest consumermarket in the EUand the pioneer of the transparency principle, view disclosures online as currently defined in European law.We obtained responses on online information obligations’ goals and target groups, their shortcomings and how they could be improved, compliance and processing costs for businesses and consumers, and transparency. We conclude by advocating a paradigm shift in research on information obligations and the formulation of the EU policies that govern them. We propose the alternative view that consumers read disclosures mainly in a post-contract conclusion scenario, as this is a more realistic assumption on their actual use case. On this basis we submit various policy proposals.\u0000Transparency, online information obligations, consumer policy, empirical legal studies, qualitative research","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48074169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

The Scope of Defense Against Hostile Takeovers in Poland: Another Argument for the Triviality Thesis 波兰对敌意收购的防御范围:琐碎论的另一论据

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020061

M. Wolangiewicz

引用次数: 0

Fernando Gascón Inchausti & Burkhard Hess (eds), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure Fernando Gascón Inchausti和Burkhard Hess（编辑），欧洲民事诉讼法的未来

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020070

J. Werbrouck

引用次数: 0

Das UN-Kaufrecht wird vierzig 联合国贸易法将达到40年

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020060

A. Janssen

引用次数: 0

C. Sganga, Propertizing European Copyright. History, Challenges and Opportunities C. Sganga，《欧洲版权资产化》。历史、挑战和机遇

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020069

Johan Van de Voorde

引用次数: 0

L. Gutkin, Die Europäisierung der AGB-Kontrolle von Preisänderungsklauseln* 赖金，agb价格操纵欧洲化

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020068

M. Loos

引用次数: 0

Les droits subjectifs inclusifs en droits belge, français et américain Analyse à partir du droit aux choses communes (y compris la public trust doctrine), du droit à l’usage des voies publiques et du droit aux biens communaux 比利时、法国和美国法律中的主观包容性权利，从公共物品权(包括公共信托原则)、公共道路使用权和公共财产权进行分析

IF 0.3

European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2020062

J. Van de Voorde

{"title":"Les droits subjectifs inclusifs en droits belge, français et américain Analyse à partir du droit aux choses communes (y compris la public trust doctrine), du droit à l’usage des voies publiques et du droit aux biens communaux","authors":"J. Van de Voorde","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020062","url":null,"abstract":"The search for instruments to protect the environment has lead to the rediscovery of some ancient legal concepts, notably the res communes in the sense of article 714 of the Belgian and French Civil Code (Article 3.43 of the new Belgian Civil Code) and the public trust doctrine in United States law. The res communes are things which cannot be appropriated by anyone (such as water in rivers and seas, atmospheric air, nature and several components of nature), on which each therefore has a subjective right of use and enjoyment. This subjective right is protected, as are all subjective rights, by a cause of action (even independent of any tort). The fact that the right concerning res communes or the public trust benefit in principle everyone has interesting implications: it is not an exclusive subjective right, but an inclusive subjective right. The category of inclusive subjective rights is rather unknown and neglected in legal analysis. This contribution analyses this category, firstly identifying some inclusive subjective rights (next to the res communes and the public trust, it studies in the first place the rights to use public highways and more generally government property destined for public use (domaine public) and in the second place the collective rights of inhabitants of local communities to certain goods held by the incorporated community). It analyses then some of the general principles of their legal status, followed by an examination of their protection by legal action before the courts.\u0000Environmental protection - res communes - subjective rights - French law - Belgian law - Code Napoléon - inclusivity - inclusive subjective rights - exclusivity - public trust doctrine","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45472614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0