{"title":"Accrual Versus Cash Basis of Accounting in the Canadian COVID-19 Subsidy Programs*","authors":"Amin Mawani, Salim Hajee","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12398","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The principal eligibility criterion for the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) during the COVID-19 pandemic was a reduction of at least a prespecified percentage in monthly revenues compared to the same months in the prior year, or compared to January and February 2020 (just prior to the launch of CEWS in March 2020). The revenues could be measured using accrual or the cash basis of accounting. Since subsidy applicants could choose the cash method of accounting and use January and February 2020 as reference periods, seasonal businesses that generated most of their revenues in January and February could claim subsidies without experiencing any reductions in revenue. We illustrate how a seasonal business with higher monthly accrued revenues compared to the pre-pandemic year could be eligible for CEWS by using the cash basis of accounting in the subsidy application even though it would not qualify using the accrual accounting method. It seems inequitable for business or wage subsidies to be based on the choice of accounting methods. There is no sound public policy reason to subsidize (or tax) one firm more than another just because they use a different method of accounting. Evaluating accounting methods embedded within government subsidy programs is an important endeavor to ensure neutrality and effectiveness of public spending programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"423-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12398","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embracing the Perks of Faulty Roadmaps: A Literature Review of Sociological Perspectives on Budgeting*","authors":"Kai DeMott","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12394","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This literature review provides an overview of sociological perspectives on budgeting. The organizational relevance of budgeting has made it the subject of many perspectives and comprehensive reviews. However, the “niche” of sociological budgeting research deserves more attention as it helps us understand how and why budgets thrive—not necessarily by providing direction, but precisely because they offer faulty roadmaps that evoke conflict, human interaction, individual reflection, power struggles, and change. The study reviews 115 publications concerned with these social dynamics of budgeting. The analysis is structured along Czarniawska-Joerges and Jacobsson's (1989, <i>Accounting, Organizations and Society 14</i>(1), 29–39) discussion of three interrelated social functions of budgeting: a symbolic performance, a means of communication, and an expression of values. Based on this analysis, the study endorses sociological perspectives as a fruitful and often underrepresented resource to advance the discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of budgeting, identifying promising areas for future research that remain largely underexplored.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"553-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12394","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Are Breaks Always Helpful? The Interaction of Work Breaks and Working Memory Capacity on Accounting Error Detection*","authors":"David Aizenberg, Alyssa S. J. Ong, Xin Geng","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12400","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Accounting review tasks undertaken by supervisors are crucial in the discovery of discrepancies. Most individuals believe that in this context the majority of breaks taken are beneficial, rather than harmful, to work performance. This study explores the improvement that breaks can bring to accounting tasks and how individuals' working memory capacity (WMC) moderates the relationship between breaks and task performance. Through an experiment, we find that when breaks are assessed together with WMC, low-WMC participants who took a break between tasks did not perform better on a review task than those who did not take a break. Break-taking was most beneficial to review task performance for individuals with high WMC. Although prior break research has mostly been studied in a blue-collar setting, exploring the impact of breaks on performance in an accounting setting is important as psychology research findings do not always translate into this context.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 3","pages":"669-693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145007996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Effect of Operating Leverage on Managers' Capital Investment Decisions*","authors":"Sangmok Lee","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12397","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Holding all else constant, a larger proportion of fixed costs in the cost structure (i.e., higher operating leverage) implies a greater profit volatility for a given level of demand fluctuation. In a setting where operating leverage is irrelevant to the choice of investment projects, I experimentally examine whether managers under high operating leverage (as opposed to low operating leverage) choose a less profitable project for lower variability in anticipated earnings. Inconsistent with the hypothesis, I find that the level of operating leverage has an insignificant impact on managers' investment choices, providing preliminary evidence that managers may correctly identify the level of operating leverage as irrelevant. Notably, providing the cost structure information to managers, regardless of whether it pertains to high or low operating leverage, increases the likelihood of selecting the more profitable investment. Additional analyses suggest that the excerpt on operating leverage might prime managers to deliberate more on the investment decisions. Managers who receive the cost structure information dedicate more time to assessing the investment projects, which in turn aids in identifying the more profitable project.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"393-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12397","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Job Market Competency Requirements for Accounting Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Online Job Ads from SMEs and Large Enterprises*","authors":"Sylvestre Uwizeyemungu, Jacques Bertrand","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12396","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12396","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Compared to large enterprises (LEs), small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have unique characteristics that may affect their needs in several areas. Thus, the “one-size-fits-all” approach to meeting the needs of both groups of enterprises would be inappropriate in different circumstances. In this study, we examine the current competency requirements of the Canadian market for professional accounting jobs with the following research question in mind: To what extent do SMEs' requirements for professional accounting positions differ from those of large companies? The study draws on person-environment fit theory and job market signaling theory. It is based on a content analysis of 310 online job postings (of which 111, or 35.8%, are from SMEs) for accounting professionals or for positions requiring strong accounting knowledge. Our results show a complex picture made up of similarities and differences between SMEs and LEs' requirements when recruiting professionals in accounting-related positions. The study points to some paradoxes and contributes to the debate about the evolution of accounting education in relation to specific business needs. In particular, the study suggests that SMEs' competency requirements are not necessarily commensurate with the needs dictated by their specific context. From a practical point of view, the results of the study could be of interest to SME managers and organizations dedicated to SMEs' development; recruitment services; national accounting organizations, such as the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada; and the academic and professional communities involved in the training of professional accountants.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"343-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12396","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assure or Insure Cyber Risk? Nonprofessional Investors' Willingness to Invest*","authors":"Kevin Gauch, Reiner Quick","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12389","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizations face severe cyber risks, which may lead companies to contract related insurance or to demand cybersecurity assurance services to signal risk management. This paper experimentally investigates how cybersecurity assurance and insurance against cyber risks impact nonprofessional investors. We conducted an experiment with a 2 × 2 between-subjects design with 100 UK nonprofessional investors and manipulated the assurance provision and insurance purchase to analyze their impact on willingness to invest. Our results suggest that cybersecurity assurance and cyber risk insurance positively affect willingness to invest. The results confirm the usefulness of measures to handle cyber risks and are of interest to managers, auditors, regulators, and academics.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"517-552"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12389","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Sociology of Exclusion: A Knowledge Synthesis of Imperialism, Colonialism, and Postcolonialism in Accounting Research*","authors":"Akolisa Ufodike","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12378","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ways in which accountancy (accounting, accountability, and accountants) has been a device of imperialism, colonialism, and postcolonialism, and therefore has had deleterious effects on Indigenous peoples in former colonies and continues to negatively impact immigrants in postcolonial OECD countries, is under-researched. This structured literature review synthesizes studies in the accounting literature that have investigated imperialism, colonialism, and postcolonialism and identifies opportunities for future research. This study is part of a broader research project that reviewed 161 articles on accounting and discrimination. This article, based on 65 of the articles reviewed for the broader project, discusses existing knowledge on imperialism, colonialism, and postcolonialism. The author finds that the exclusion of Indigenous peoples in colonial times is shaped by perpetual oppressive relations. In the postcolonial United States and Old Commonwealth countries (Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), these power relations are sustained by professions through the continuing exclusion of racialized people and immigrants, many from previous colonies. This study proposes future research directions to advance the decolonization of accounting research by foregrounding alternative perspectives of Indigeneity—such as Black Indigeneity—and enabling accounting scholars to confront the various subthemes of imperialism and postcolonialism in accounting, including Western accounting and accountability, professionalization, emancipatory accounting, and Indigenous knowledge and accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 2","pages":"469-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12378","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Predictive Ability of Taxable Income for Future Performance: The Impact of High Tax Planning*","authors":"Yong Qiang Chen, Flora Niu, Tao Zeng","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12384","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This research examines whether high tax planning affects the predictive ability of taxable income for firms' future operating performance. Using US-listed firms for the period 1988 to 2016, this study finds that high tax planning reduces the ability of taxable income to predict future performance, measured as 1-, 2-, and 3-year-ahead operating cash flows. It also shows that high tax planning decreases the incremental predictive value of taxable income for future performance beyond book income and operating cash flows. This study contributes to the existing literature on the informative nature of taxable income and enhances our understanding of how tax planning affects the information content of taxable income, particularly its predictive ability for firms' future performance. These findings suggest that, when using taxable income to predict future performance, financial statement users should consider the level of aggressiveness in firms' tax planning activities.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 1","pages":"101-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143633101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Merridee Bujaki, Irfan Butt, Camillo Lento, Patricia Meredith, Sara Wick
{"title":"A Commentary on Post-Pandemic Challenges and Opportunities for the Accounting Profession: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review*","authors":"Merridee Bujaki, Irfan Butt, Camillo Lento, Patricia Meredith, Sara Wick","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12387","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This empirically grounded commentary explores the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the strategic direction of Canada's accounting profession and highlights opportunities and challenges that lie ahead in the post-pandemic era. We undertake a systematic literature review using deductive and inductive approaches within both the academic accounting literature and a selection of publications targeting accounting practitioners. Our deductive framework uses Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada's (CPA Canada) Foresight initiative, while our inductive approach identifies themes that do not fit within the Foresight initiative. We conclude that the accounting profession will be challenged to balance the pursuit of new opportunities arising from disruptive technologies, real-time data, and new organizational value drivers while simultaneously reflecting its roots in financial reporting, auditing, and taxation. Our findings also suggest that the profession should pay more attention to the human aspects of the profound changes that are underway. Specifically, the profession focuses heavily on how accountants' work will change due to disruptive forces but not enough on how these changes impact accountants from a broader human resource management perspective (e.g., mental health challenges, alternative work arrangements, retraining, and upskilling). Our work differs from prior reviews as we incorporate both academic accounting and accounting practitioner-focused publications to propose a research agenda intended to encourage more practically relevant accounting research.</p>","PeriodicalId":43435,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Perspectives","volume":"24 1","pages":"157-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3838.12387","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143632980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}