Journal of Breast Imaging最新文献_第8页

Virtual Visiting Professorship Program as an Opportunity for Academic and Clinical Advancement Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Participants. 虚拟客座教授计划是超越 COVID-19 大流行的学术和临床进步机会：参与者调查。

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae008

Mai A Elezaby, Esraa Al-Jabbari, Lu Mao, Ravinder S Legha, David Schacht, Gary Whitman, Katerina Dodelzon, Toma S. Omofoye

{"title":"Virtual Visiting Professorship Program as an Opportunity for Academic and Clinical Advancement Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Participants.","authors":"Mai A Elezaby, Esraa Al-Jabbari, Lu Mao, Ravinder S Legha, David Schacht, Gary Whitman, Katerina Dodelzon, Toma S. Omofoye","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae008","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\u0000To identify structure, benefits, and shortcomings of a multi-institutional virtual visiting professorship (VVP) program from 2020 to 2022, 2 years after inception and after gradual resumption of an in-person, prepandemic academic environment.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000An IRB-exempt, 70-question survey about structure, benefits, and shortcomings of the VVP program was distributed to its participants (14 breast imaging departments across the U.S.), using the snowball sampling technique.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000A total of 72 responses were received; 54.2% (32/59) radiologists >5 years of experience, 18.6% (11/59) radiologists <5 years of experience, 15.3% (9/59) residents, and 8.5% (5/59) fellows. Radiologists' attendance increased from 8% (5/59) to 53% (31/59) over 2 years, with 69% (41/59) of respondents supporting continued participation. The most important factors for attendance were expanding breast imaging knowledge (86.4% [51/59]) and the virtual format (76.2% [45/59]). The number of presented lectures increased from 1 to 3 lectures in 43.7% (7/16) of programs in year 1 and from 4 to 9 lectures in 50% (8/16) of programs in year 2. The greatest professional benefits were collaborations on publications for organizers (56.3% [9/16]) and building academic portfolios for presenters (50% [7/14]). For trainees, attending the program increased their knowledge (64.3% [9/14]) and enthusiasm for breast imaging (50% [7/14]).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000The VVP program facilitated scholarly collaboration among breast imaging radiologists, promoted academic portfolios for junior faculty, and increased enthusiasm for breast imaging for trainees. These accomplishments extended beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, as evidenced by the growth of the program after resumption of an in-person academic environment. Future expansion to other programs would benefit more practicing radiologists.","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140692140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance Practice: Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists in the Society of Breast Imaging. 乳房植入成像监测实践：乳腺成像学会乳腺成像放射医师调查。

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae017

Ali Moosavi, Jason Ha, Brianna Papoutsis, Erik Lehman, Alison L. Chetlen, Angela I. Choe

{"title":"Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance Practice: Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists in the Society of Breast Imaging.","authors":"Ali Moosavi, Jason Ha, Brianna Papoutsis, Erik Lehman, Alison L. Chetlen, Angela I. Choe","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae017","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\u0000The objectives of this Society of Breast Imaging (SBI)-member survey study were to assess the current imaging patterns for evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic breast implant integrity, including modalities used and imaging intervals.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A 12-question survey assessing the frequency of imaging modalities used to evaluate implant integrity, approximate number of breast implant integrity studies requested per month, intervals of integrity studies, and referring provider and radiology practice characteristics was distributed to members of the SBI.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000The survey response rate was 7.6% (143/1890). Of responding radiologists, 54.2% (77/142) were in private, 29.6% (42/142) in academic, and 16.2% (23/142) in hybrid practice. Among respondents, the most common initial examination for evaluating implant integrity was MRI without contrast at 53.1% (76/143), followed by handheld US at 46.9% (67/143). Of respondents using US, 67.4% (91/135) also evaluated the breast tissue for abnormalities. Among respondents, 34.1% (46/135) reported being very confident or confident in US for diagnosing implant rupture. There was a range of reported intervals for performing implant integrity studies: 39.1% (43/110) every 2-3 years, 26.4% (29/110) every 4-5 years, 15.5% (17/110) every 6-10 years, and 19.1% (21/110) every 10 years.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000For assessment of implant integrity, the majority of respondents (53.2%, 76/143) reported MRI as initial imaging test. US is less costly, but the minority of respondents (34.1%, 46/135) had confidence in US performance. Also, the minority of respondents (39.1%, 43/110) performed implant integrity evaluations every 2-3 years per the FDA recommendations for asymptomatic surveillance.","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140696622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unknown Case: Breast and Axillary Lymph Node Calcifications. 不明病例：乳房和腋窝淋巴结钙化。

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae020

James T Roberts, Quan D Nguyen

引用次数: 0

Review of Breast Imaging in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: Gender-Affirming Care, Histopathologic Findings, Breast Cancer Risk, and Screening Recommendations. 变性和性别多元化患者的乳腺成像回顾：性别确认护理、组织病理学发现、乳腺癌风险和筛查建议。

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae016

AJ A Chowdhury, Assim Saad Eddin, Su Kim Hsieh, Fabiana C Policeni

{"title":"Review of Breast Imaging in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: Gender-Affirming Care, Histopathologic Findings, Breast Cancer Risk, and Screening Recommendations.","authors":"AJ A Chowdhury, Assim Saad Eddin, Su Kim Hsieh, Fabiana C Policeni","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbae016","url":null,"abstract":"Gender diversity, especially pertaining to transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) populations, is often stigmatized. A small but not insignificant number of adults in the United States identify as TGD, including transgender, nonbinary, and other gender identities than cisgender. Accessing health care remains a significant challenge for TGD individuals because many health care systems adhere to a gender binary model and many TGD individuals experience negative interactions when interfacing with health care. There is also a scarcity of literature addressing their unique health care needs, limiting our current understanding of breast cancer risks and screening recommendations for TGD patients. This article reviews important considerations when providing care to TGD patients. It covers background information on gender identity and sexuality, explores gender-affirming care, discusses histopathologic findings of breast biopsy specimens, examines breast cancer risks, and presents current breast cancer screening recommendations for TGD patients. Education on TGD breast cancer risks and screening and creating a standardized screening protocol for TGD patients who may receive gender-affirming care through hormonal and surgical therapies could help improve their health care equity and access.","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140708601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unknown Case: Chronic Progressive Breast Mass With Fistula. 未知病例：慢性进行性乳房肿块伴瘘管

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad100

E. Azouz, Haithem Aloui, Ahlem Omri, H. S. Abouda

引用次数: 0

Unknown Case: Sixty-Four-Year-Old with a Screening Mammogram-Detected Oval Mass. 不明病例：六十四岁的老人在乳房 X 光筛查中发现椭圆形肿块。

IF 1.5

Journal of Breast Imaging Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae015

Aurela Clark, Sara Bachert

引用次数: 0

Correction to: Patient Notification About Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: Empowering Women With Information About Cardiovascular Risk. 更正：关于乳房 X 射线照相术中乳房动脉钙化的患者通知：让妇女了解心血管风险信息。