Studies in East European Thought最新文献_第2页

Observing logics: revisiting reason in The Brothers Karamazov 观察逻辑：重新审视《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中的理性

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09640-7

Eric Kim

引用次数: 0

Zdziechowski’s distinctiveness: on the distinctive differences between Marian Zdziechowski’s thought and the Russian Renaissance 兹齐霍夫斯基的独特性：论玛丽安-兹齐霍夫斯基思想与俄罗斯文艺复兴之间的独特差异

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09635-4

Sławomir Mazurek

{"title":"Zdziechowski’s distinctiveness: on the distinctive differences between Marian Zdziechowski’s thought and the Russian Renaissance","authors":"Sławomir Mazurek","doi":"10.1007/s11212-024-09635-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09635-4","url":null,"abstract":"The article is a comparative analysis of the philosophy of the Russian Religious Renaissance and the views of Marian Zdziechowski (1861–1938), a Polish religious thinker, historian of ideas, and historian of literature. Zdziechowski was also an expert on and promoter of Russian religious thought. As a thinker, he was influenced by it and attempted to cope with the same problems that were plaguing the Russians: the Bolshevik revolution, the decline of Christian religion and culture, and the imminent catastrophe of the whole civilization. The paper describes the affinities between Zdziechowski and the Russian thinkers in detail, yet its main task is to grasp the differences between them, i.e., the distinctive features of Zdziechowski’s thought. The conclusion is that Zdziechowski, who—in contrast to the Russians—was not interested in the recent currents of Western philosophy, as a critic of historical Christianity and an eschatological thinker was less radical than the Russians, but as a philosopher of history he turns out to be a greater pessimist. An important part of the analysis is confrontation of literary styles typical for the Polish thinker and the Russians. A specific feature of Zdziechowski was his tendency to express his own views not in a straightforward manner, but rather by commenting and reconstructing other authors’ ideas.","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141061051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The problem of subjectivity in the works of Evald Ilyenkov and Slavoj Žižek 埃瓦尔德-伊林科夫和斯拉沃伊-日泽克作品中的主观性问题

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09626-5

Natalya Listratenko

{"title":"The problem of subjectivity in the works of Evald Ilyenkov and Slavoj Žižek","authors":"Natalya Listratenko","doi":"10.1007/s11212-024-09626-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09626-5","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the theme of subjectivity. One of the most pressing questions today is what theoretical and practical efforts should be made to avoid being a powerless tool in the hands of others and under what conditions one’s own “subjective opinion” becomes the real, reliable fulcrum as far as purposeful activity, free and reasonable goal-setting are concerned. The desire to derive subjectivity from individual, singular existence today forces a thinker as prominent as Slavoj Žižek to search for its form as “purified from” ideological layers and the contingencies of life. In his search for such a form, he turns to the psychoanalytic tradition, to the work of Jacques Lacan and his attempts to formalize the structures of subjectivity in isolation from the universality that generates them as necessity. This abstract consideration of subjectivity leads him to recognize subjectivity as a “distorting factor” in view of the insurmountable rupture between being and thinking. Evald Ilyenkov takes a different approach to the question of active self-determination. He conceives of personality as universal—the traits of a person are formed in the course of interaction between individuals in the process of producing the means of life. The individual becomes a personality or an acting subject, appropriating the generic powers of humanity, while being included in a system that implies a human relationship to the thing and, through it, to another individual.","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Towards understanding the nature of theology in the thought of Frs. S. N. Bulgakov, G. V. Florovsky and the Venerable Sophrony Sakharov 从 S. N. 布尔加科夫、G. V. 弗罗洛夫斯基和尊贵的索夫洛尼-萨哈罗夫的思想中理解神学的本质

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09633-6

{"title":"Towards understanding the nature of theology in the thought of Frs. S. N. Bulgakov, G. V. Florovsky and the Venerable Sophrony Sakharov","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11212-024-09633-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09633-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> This paper focuses on what can be said to be the definitive features of the approach to theology by three Russian theologians: Fathers Sergii Bulgakov and Georges Florovsky as well as the Venerable Father Sophrony Sakharov. The article argues that the following common themes characterize the nature of their theology. First, personalism, in other words, the use of the term “person”, which they extensively applied to both God and human and angelic beings. The concept of person is indispensable in the thought of all three theologians. The second common theme is how the authors understood the relationship between theology and experience and what is the significance of religious experience for philosophical theology. Finally, all three theologians agree that when theological truths are expressed in human language the problem of interpretation consequently arises. However, they answer in different ways the question of the number and status of possible theological languages. I conclude that it is St. Sophrony Sakharov who in his life and theology realized Florovsky’s famous call for a neo-patristic synthesis.","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140580192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Religion in Alexandre Kojève’s atheistic philosophy of science 亚历山大-科耶夫无神论科学哲学中的宗教问题

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09634-5

引用次数: 0

“The Polish question” in the correspondence of Prince Evgenii Nikolaevitch Troubetzkoy and Marian Zdziechowski "叶夫根尼-尼古拉耶维奇-特鲁贝兹科伊亲王与玛丽安-兹齐霍夫斯基通信中的 "波兰问题

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09624-7

Gennadii Aliaiev

引用次数: 0

Ukraine, language policies and liberalism: a mixed second act 乌克兰、语言政策和自由主义：喜忧参半的第二幕

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-023-09612-3

Joseph Place, Judas Everett

引用次数: 0

Evald Ilyenkov’s legacy in Ukraine 艾瓦尔德-伊连科夫在乌克兰的遗产

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-023-09623-0

{"title":"Evald Ilyenkov’s legacy in Ukraine","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11212-023-09623-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09623-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> This article is dedicated to the philosophical legacy of Evald Ilyenkov in Soviet and post-Soviet Ukraine. The authors use the example of Ilyenkov and his legacy to show how drastically different the philosophical situation was in Soviet Ukraine in order to present a holistic viewpoint on Soviet philosophy. The authors highlight the differences between the political and philosophical circumstances in Russia and Ukraine from the 1950s to the 2010s. The Ukrainian philosophical tradition is characterized by its focus on pedagogics, aesthetics, and nonacademic forms of philosophical communication. The main organizational role in Ukrainian philosophy was played by Pavel Kopnin and Valeriy Bosenko, who introduced dialectics as logic to Kyiv universities and made an effort to create philosophical circles for students. Anatoliy Kanarskiy, the prominent Soviet philosopher who specialized in aesthetics adopted the same idea of organizing students into circles. All these personalities were connected with Ilyenkov and each other, thus proving the existence of a common tendency and tradition of thinking within the discourse of Soviet philosophy. The authors highlight that this specific tradition may be called a “Socratic tradition” with its focus on free thinking, on discussions and dialectics. This tradition goes beyond academic philosophy and roots itself in cybernetical studies by Viktor Hlushkov and exists in modern Ukraine in the form of various philosophical circles and literature clubs.","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139768971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Different Senses of the Word Intuition 直觉一词的不同意义

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-024-09625-6

Nikolai O. Lossky, Frédéric Tremblay

{"title":"The Different Senses of the Word Intuition","authors":"Nikolai O. Lossky, Frédéric Tremblay","doi":"10.1007/s11212-024-09625-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-024-09625-6","url":null,"abstract":"This is a translation from Bulgarian into English of Nikolai Lossky’s “Razlichniiat smisul na dumata intuitsiia” (“The Different Senses of the Word Intuition”), published in the Sofianite journal Filosofski pregled (Philosophical Review), 1931, year III, book 1, pp. 1–9. In this article, solicited by the journal’s editor-in-chief, the Bulgarian philosopher Dimitar Mihalchev, Lossky surveys the different ways in which the word “intuition” (intuitsiia) has been used throughout the history of philosophy: Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Friedrich Jacobi, Ivan Kireevski, Alexei Khomyakov, Vladimir Solovyov, Bergson, Husserl, and Hans Driesch. Lossky then situates his own use of the word within this philosophical tradition and compares his intuitivism with gnoseologies similar to his own, namely, those of Semyon Frank, Johannes Rehmke, Max Scheler, Paul Linke, Dimitar Mihalchev, the English realists (Samuel Alexander and John Laird), the American realists (Edwin Holt, Walter Marvin, William Montague, Ralph Perry, Walter Pitkin, and Edward Spaulding), and the Neo-Scholastic Josef Gredt. As such, the article makes a valuable addendum to his Obosnovanie intuitivizma (The Foundation of Intuitivism) (1906) and provides a helpful synopsis of his theory of knowledge, which, in accordance with the Russian terminological tradition, he calls “gnoseology”.","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139760749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Analytic patristics 分析教义学

IF 0.2 3区哲学

Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI: 10.1007/s11212-023-09609-y

Paweł Rojek

引用次数: 0