{"title":"RESEÑA de: Miguel Ángel Presno Linera ; Germán Teruel Lozano. La libertad de expresión en América y Europa. Juruá Editorial, Lisboa, 2017","authors":"Ignacio Álvarez Rodríguez","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24444","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>-</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24444","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48881827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"RESEÑA de: Pablo Pérez Tremps. Las reformas de la Constitución hechas y no hechas. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2018","authors":"I. Vitoria","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24442","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>-</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24442","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46460704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La coerción federal en la Ley Fundamental. La recepción de una categoría clásica del sistema descentralizado alemán","authors":"L. A. Álvarez","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24419","url":null,"abstract":"Este trabajo analiza la categoría de la coerción federal en la Ley Fundamental alemana. La coerción federal atribuye al Estado central la facultad de responder frente a la infracción de las obligaciones federales por parte de los Estados federados. La doctrina apenas ha construido una teoría de la coacción federal vinculada a la vigente Ley Fundamental, sino que ha asumido, con carácter general, los resultados de la ejecución federal. Una categoría que encuentra su origen en la época de la confederación alemana del siglo xix y en un concepto de Constitución y de sistema descentralizado distintos a los asumidos en la vigente Constitución.This paper analyses the federal coercion in the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. The Federal coercion allows the Central State to respond to a breach of the federal obligations by the federated states. The literature has not developed a theory of the federal coercion for the German Constitution. The function and the content of the federal coercion in the current german Constitution has been imported of the category of the federal execution, arisen from the xix German confederation system and based on a different concept of Constitution and decentralized State.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24419","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41384053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"¿Progresión o regresión constitucional de la justicia penal española? Irrupción del populismo judicial y del derecho penal de autor","authors":"Luís Rodríguez Ramos","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24404","url":null,"abstract":"Este artículo analiza, en primer lugar, los aspectos de la legislación y de la praxis de la organización y funcionamiento de la Administración de Justicia en general y, de modo especial, en lo atinente al orden jurisdiccional penal, derivados de la configuración dada por la Constitución de 1978; y, a continuación, destaca las realidades sobrevenidas con posterioridad a dicha fecha, igualmente contrarias a los principios o preceptos constitucionales. Desde lo anterior, el autor propone en ambos ámbitos (general y penal) soluciones “de lege data et ferenda” de avance hacia la “Segunda revolución de la Justicia española”, tan pendiente como urgente, pues al haber acaecido la primera por obra y gracia de la Revolución “Gloriosa” de 1868, la España actual, muy distinta de la de hace más de siglo y medio, precisa de una Administración de Justicia acorde con los tiempos.The article analyzes the configuration given by the Spanish Constitution (1978) to the justice administration and the specialties of the criminal jurisdiction, pointing the unsatisfactory aspects of the constitutional model. Following, the author highlights the real evolution of both the general and the criminal justice administration activity since the Constitution was enacted, reality which has become unrespectful with the Constitution´s principles and regulations. Finally, the document propose for both general and criminal justice administration “de lege data et ferenda” solutions to drive the Spanish judicial administration to an adaptation to current time needs, evolving from the results of the first revolution of justice administration (Gloriosa in 1868) to a second and highly needed revolution.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24404","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42720062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"VI Premio de la Revista “Teoría y Realidad Constitucional” para artículos científicos de constitucionalistas jóvenes","authors":"_ _","doi":"10.5944/trc.43.2019.24493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.43.2019.24493","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>Bases</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/trc.43.2019.24493","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43802964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Carlos Ruíz del Castillo, constitucionalista de la Primera Postguerra Mundial","authors":"Ignacio Álvarez Rodríguez","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24437","url":null,"abstract":"Semblanza de Carlos Ruiz del Castillo, jurista español y Catedrático de Derecho Político.Biographical sketch of Carlos Ruiz del Castillo, spanish legal expert and Professor of Constitutional Law.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24437","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45027975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Libertad de expresión y tutela de la Corona: el caso de «El Jueves»","authors":"I. Sarasola","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24430","url":null,"abstract":"En 2007, la revista satírica «El Jueves» sufrió un secuestro judicial, y dos de sus dibujantes resultaron condenados por un delito contra el honor de la Corona. Ambas resoluciones judiciales sometieron la libertad de expresión a unas restricciones excepcionales, y dieron lugar a que los propios editores optaran con posterioridad a medidas de autocensura. Sin embargo, tales restricciones fueron fruto de una inadecuada protección del honor de la Corona en el Código Penal, y de uso erróneo de la cláusula de proporcionalidad por parte de la Audiencia Nacional.In 2007 the Spanish satirical journal “El Jueves” was under judicial confiscation and two of its authors were prosecuted for criminal offense against the Crown’s honor. Both judicial resolutions subjected the freedom to expression to exceptional restrictions and moved the publishers to further self-censure. Nevertheless, these restrictions dealt with an inadequate protection to Crown honor in Spanish Criminal Code, and with a wrong use of the proportional clause by the Audiencia Nacional.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24430","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44112859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"La tramitación de la reforma constitucional mediante procedimientos legislativos abreviados: un problema de límites procedimentales","authors":"Yolanda Gómez Lugo","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24432","url":null,"abstract":"¿Pueden las Cámaras tramitar las iniciativas de reforma constitucional aplicando simultáneamente los procedimientos parlamentarios de reforma constitucional y procedimientos legislativos abreviados? Más específicamente, ¿puede considerarse que los métodos de lectura única y urgencia son procedimientos adecuados para tramitar la revisión de la Constitución? En el Auto 9/2012 el Tribunal Constitucional parece haberse decantado por la tesis de la simultaneidad procedimental, conforme a la cual los procedimientos de reforma constitucional podrían aplicarse transversalmente junto a las técnicas procedimentales de lectura única y de urgencia. Sin embargo, haciendo una interpretación sistemática de las normas constitucionales y parlamentarias que regulan el modo de producción legislativa, es posible deducir que dichas modalidades abreviadas actúan como límites procedimentales en la tramitación parlamentaria de la revisión de la Constitución.Can the Parliament process constitutional reform initiatives applying the procedures of constitutional reform and abbreviated legislative procedures simultaneously? More specifically, can it be considered that the method of single reading and the urgent procedure are adequate for processing the revision of the Constitution? In the decision ATC 9/2012 the Constitutional Court seems to have embraced the thesis of procedural simultaneity, according to which the procedures of constitutional reform could be applied transversally along with the legislative techniques of single reading and urgency. However, making a systematic interpretation of constitutional and parliamentary rules governing the lawmaking process, it might be argued that these kind of abbreviates procedures act as procedural limits in the parliamentary processing of the constitutional revision.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24432","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47243346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Callejón, M. Campos, Ángela Figueruelo Burrieza, Teresa Freixes Sanjuán, I. Fernández, F. Martínez, O. Benítez
{"title":"Encuesta sobre la igualdad entre hombres y mujeres","authors":"M. Callejón, M. Campos, Ángela Figueruelo Burrieza, Teresa Freixes Sanjuán, I. Fernández, F. Martínez, O. Benítez","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24398","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24398","url":null,"abstract":"En esta encuesta un grupo de profesores de Derecho Constitucional contesta un conjunto de preguntas sobre el principio de igualdad entre hombres y mujeres: su reconocimiento constitucional; los avances, logros y obstáculos en la consecución de este objetivo; los impulsos políticos y jurídicos recibidos; las propuestas de reforma constitucional al respecto; y la labor desarrollada por el Tribunal Constitucional y el legislador.In this academic survey a group of Constitutional Law Professors answer some questions about the equality between men and women: its constitutional recognition; the progress, achievements and obstacles in reaching this goal; the political and legal impulses received; the proposals for constitutional reform in this regard; and the work developed by the Constitutional Court and the legislator.","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48643107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"RESEÑA de: Julian Sauquillo González. La reforma constitucional. Sujetos y límites del poder constituyente. Tecnos, Madrid, 2018","authors":"Leyre Burguera Ameave","doi":"10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5944/TRC.43.2019.24459","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>-</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":43046,"journal":{"name":"Teoria y Realidad Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45034761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}