Neil R Jordan, Michelle Campbell-Ward, James Vandersteen, Nicholas Colman, Brendan Alting, Dushmantha Gamage, Kylie M Cairns, Mathew Bell, Jose Altuna, Benjamin J Pitcher
{"title":"Inferring interspecific killing of Red Fox by Dingo from wounds and inter-canine distance measures – and a call for more data","authors":"Neil R Jordan, Michelle Campbell-Ward, James Vandersteen, Nicholas Colman, Brendan Alting, Dushmantha Gamage, Kylie M Cairns, Mathew Bell, Jose Altuna, Benjamin J Pitcher","doi":"10.7882/az.2023.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2023.030","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The role of the Dingo (variously Canis familiaris, C. familiaris dingo or C. lupus dingo, and hereafter C. dingo) in suppressing Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations in Australia has been investigated, with various data tending to show an inverse relationship between densities of the two species (e.g. Letnic et al. 2012; Johnson and VanDerWal 2009). There are very few examples in the literature where direct killing was either observed or inferred (but see Moseby et al. 2012), making each a valuable datapoint. Here, we present a short description of a young adult female Red Fox presumed to have been killed by Dingo in Myall Lakes National Park on the basis of: (1) the close proximity of a Dingo pack (within approximately 20m) to the carcass; (2) the overlap between recorded values of inter-canine distance in Dingo and the wounds on the Red Fox; and (3) the location of those wounds on the body.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135294414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Observations on the display flights of male Brown Songlarks (<i>Cincloramphus cruralis</i> Vigors and Horsfield 1827) before and after the application of fenitrothion, an organophosphorous pesticide for locust control, in a semi-arid grassland in southwestern New South Wales and suggestions for further research","authors":"Paul Story, Kimberly Maute","doi":"10.7882/az.2023.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2023.005","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Exposure of songbirds to organophosphorous pesticides has been shown to affect a range of behavioural characteristics including singing, displaying and flying that consequently can have significant impacts on the viability of free-living individuals and populations. In the current study, display flights of male Brown Songlarks (Cincloramphus cruralis Vigors and Horsfield 1827) before and after the application of fenitrothion (O,O-dimethyl-O-[3-methyl-4-nitrophenyl]-phosphorothioate) during locust spray operations around Conargo, south western New South Wales, were monitored incidentally for number, duration and the presence of song during flight. The duration of display flights undertaken by male C. cruralis showed a statistically significant increase after exposure to fenitrothion (t0.05, 398 = 1.97; p = 0.0085, analysed using log10 transformed flight duration data), despite the mean number of flights undertaken decreasing from 5.7 pre-spray to 4.7 post-spray during 10 min survey periods. The proportion of display flights in which the male was calling, however, did not differ between pesticide-exposed and unexposed male C. cruralis (χ2(0.05, 1) = 0.323; p = 0.570). To better understand the impacts of pesticide exposure on C. cruralis behaviour and ecology, the observations presented here require further study and validation with the addition of other variables such as territory mapping, assessment of reproductive success and the quantification of enzymatic biomarkers indicative of exposure to organophosphorous insecticides, undertaken concomitantly.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136293041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Notes on a newly discovered population of the Pygmy Copperhead Austrelaps labialis (Jan, 1859) in the Adelaide Hills, South Australia","authors":"S. Scott, Richard Biffin","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The Pygmy Copperhead Austrelaps labialis is South Australia’s only endemic snake, being native to the Adelaide Mount Lofty Ranges and Fleurieu Peninsula; with an additional allopatric population on Kangaroo Island. Within the AMLR, it inhabits stringybark forests and adjacent dense vegetation, occupying a total area of ~150 km2. Here, we document a newly discovered and seemingly isolated population at the north-eastern extent of its known mainland distribution. We visited Lobethal Bushland Park from 2013–2018 and observed snakes of varying age and size, while documenting their ecology and behaviour. In late 2019, the site was decimated by catastrophic wildfire and its persistence here remains unknown. Alongside descriptions of our observations, we suggest measures for the conservation of this vulnerable population in its remnant habitat if it has survived the impacts of wildfire.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"463 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127008366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A detailed description of the breeding season of a community of birds on the south-east coast of Australia","authors":"M. Guppy, A. Overs, S. Guppy","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The details of a breeding season have been investigated and described for many bird species and groups of species, but rarely for an entire breeding community. The collection of such data is the only way of quantifying the number of birds a habitat can support, how many fledglings it can produce, and the avian diversity that can exist in the habitat. Without these quantitative and qualitative measures, the significance of particular habitats for avian conservation is difficult to assess. We have accumulated comprehensive data on a breeding bird community on a 10 ha site for eight seasons, which has enabled us to condense the many aspects of breeding into an ‘average’ breeding season. The breeding community consisted of 44 species, which used all of the site for nesting. Some species bred each season, while others bred as infrequently as once in the eight seasons. Nesting occurred between the beginning of August and the end of January, different species showed markedly different starting and finishing times, and there were different temporal patterns of breeding within the breeding periods of the different species. The number of pairs that bred on the site varied each season, a pattern that we have previously shown to be related to the value of the Southern Oscillation Index before the start of the season. Nest success rates varied considerably between species, but the overall success rate on the site was approximately 50%. We estimate that the spotted gum forest habitat on the south-east coast of Australia (1200 km2) produces approximately 1.5 million fledglings each season.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133227072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D. Lettoof, A. Santoro, C. V. Swinstead, J. Cornelis
{"title":"First record of predation of a hatchling turtle by the Western tiger snake (Notechis scutatus occidentalis).","authors":"D. Lettoof, A. Santoro, C. V. Swinstead, J. Cornelis","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Snake-Turtle interactions have been rarely documented. We recorded a hatchling Chelodina oblonga within the stomach contents of a Western tiger snake (Notechis scutatus occidentalis). This is the first recorded observation of an interaction between snakes and hatchling freshwater turtles in Western Australia. Field based palpation failed to detect the hatchling, suggesting that without dissection, turtle hatchling predation by snakes more generally could be higher than commonly reported. Snake predation of hatchlings could be placing additional pressure on threatened populations of freshwater turtles in Australia, warranting further investigation.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130361877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Rediscovering a role for dingoes on Wooleen Station","authors":"D. Pollock","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 We have never been able to rest our country. Pastoralists could move the sheep or the cattle from the paddock, but 61 per cent of the grazing by goats and kangaroos remains. This continual grazing of the most valuable plant species, to their local extinction, has left the land unproductive and bleeding. The dingo has allowed this landscape to be effectively rested for the first time in 130 years because, in the past 10 to 15 years, the dingoes have entirely removed the goats from Wooleen and almost entirely removed them from the Murchison, Gascoyne and Goldfields districts. But that's not the half of it, I estimate the dingoes have also removed 80 to 90 per cent of the kangaroo population. So overall, a 50 to 55 per cent reduction in grazing pressure over the great majority of an area larger than France, in the last 12 years. A stupendous achievement. Dingoes give us the opportunity for the first time in 130 years to manage the unmanageable. Without them, the supposedly renewable resource that is the southern rangelands can only continue its downward spiral.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123317404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Mills, B. Wijas, C. Gordon, M. Lyons, Anna Feit, A. Wilkinson, Mike Letnic
{"title":"Two alternate states: shrub, bird and mammal assemblages differ on either side of the Dingo Barrier Fence","authors":"C. Mills, B. Wijas, C. Gordon, M. Lyons, Anna Feit, A. Wilkinson, Mike Letnic","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The 5500 km long dingo barrier fence (DBF) is a boundary at which the goal of dingo control programs shifts from management to elimination. Since 1980 ecologists have used the discrepancies in dingo densities across the DBF to study the ecological role of Australia’s largest terrestrial predator.\u0000 We used drone imagery, ground based shrub and tree counts, and camera trap footage to test our hypothesis that there are alternate states in plant, bird and mammal assemblages on either side of the DBF. We found that shrubs and trees were twice as dense where dingoes were rare, and 28 % of shrub and tree species, 78 % of mammal species, and 14 % of bird species recorded were significantly more likely to occur on one side of the DBF than the other.\u0000 We provide the first comprehensive snapshot of how flora and fauna assemblages differ across the DBF. This study adds to literature demonstrating that the removal of the dingo has led to profound shifts in the shrub, mammal and bird assemblages in arid Australia. Any expansion of dingo control in arid Australia must be considered against the far-reaching consequences for ecosystem assembly associated with the removal of a top predator.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122997315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What is a dingo – origins, hybridisation and identity","authors":"K. Cairns","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Controversy about the nomenclature and taxonomy of dingoes has sparked interest in their complex identity. At the root of taxonomy debates are differences in the species concepts employed, differing opinions about the domestication status of dingoes (and their ancestors) and a simplistic handling of the complex evolutionary relationship between wolves, dingoes and domestic dogs. I explore the relationship of dingoes to village dogs, modern breed dogs and wolves using genome-wide SNP data and discuss the implications of these findings to the ongoing debate about dingo identity and nomenclature. Importantly, despite controversy about what to call dingoes and whether they are a full species, these animals represent an important, distinct and unique evolutionary unit worthy of high conservation priority, as a native species. There is growing concern about the spread of domestic dog genes into dingo populations, particularly in southeastern Australia, and the impact this has on conservation goals. However, the discovery of biogeographic subdivision within dingoes raises questions about the accuracy of the current methods used for estimating dog vs dingo ancestry. I caution scientists and wildlife managers to carefully consider the limitations of current ancestry estimate methods when assessing DNA test results. Future work using genome-wide DNA technology to improve dingo ancestry estimates will be fundamental to ongoing debate about what dingoes are, how to identify dingoes and how to conserve them.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"10 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123098722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}