What is a dingo – origins, hybridisation and identity

K. Cairns
{"title":"What is a dingo – origins, hybridisation and identity","authors":"K. Cairns","doi":"10.7882/AZ.2021.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Controversy about the nomenclature and taxonomy of dingoes has sparked interest in their complex identity. At the root of taxonomy debates are differences in the species concepts employed, differing opinions about the domestication status of dingoes (and their ancestors) and a simplistic handling of the complex evolutionary relationship between wolves, dingoes and domestic dogs. I explore the relationship of dingoes to village dogs, modern breed dogs and wolves using genome-wide SNP data and discuss the implications of these findings to the ongoing debate about dingo identity and nomenclature. Importantly, despite controversy about what to call dingoes and whether they are a full species, these animals represent an important, distinct and unique evolutionary unit worthy of high conservation priority, as a native species. There is growing concern about the spread of domestic dog genes into dingo populations, particularly in southeastern Australia, and the impact this has on conservation goals. However, the discovery of biogeographic subdivision within dingoes raises questions about the accuracy of the current methods used for estimating dog vs dingo ancestry. I caution scientists and wildlife managers to carefully consider the limitations of current ancestry estimate methods when assessing DNA test results. Future work using genome-wide DNA technology to improve dingo ancestry estimates will be fundamental to ongoing debate about what dingoes are, how to identify dingoes and how to conserve them.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"10 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian zoologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2021.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Controversy about the nomenclature and taxonomy of dingoes has sparked interest in their complex identity. At the root of taxonomy debates are differences in the species concepts employed, differing opinions about the domestication status of dingoes (and their ancestors) and a simplistic handling of the complex evolutionary relationship between wolves, dingoes and domestic dogs. I explore the relationship of dingoes to village dogs, modern breed dogs and wolves using genome-wide SNP data and discuss the implications of these findings to the ongoing debate about dingo identity and nomenclature. Importantly, despite controversy about what to call dingoes and whether they are a full species, these animals represent an important, distinct and unique evolutionary unit worthy of high conservation priority, as a native species. There is growing concern about the spread of domestic dog genes into dingo populations, particularly in southeastern Australia, and the impact this has on conservation goals. However, the discovery of biogeographic subdivision within dingoes raises questions about the accuracy of the current methods used for estimating dog vs dingo ancestry. I caution scientists and wildlife managers to carefully consider the limitations of current ancestry estimate methods when assessing DNA test results. Future work using genome-wide DNA technology to improve dingo ancestry estimates will be fundamental to ongoing debate about what dingoes are, how to identify dingoes and how to conserve them.
什么是澳洲野狗——起源、杂交和身份
关于澳洲野狗的命名和分类的争议引发了人们对其复杂身份的兴趣。分类学争论的根源在于所采用的物种概念的不同,对野狗(及其祖先)驯化状态的不同看法,以及对狼、野狗和家狗之间复杂进化关系的简单化处理。我利用全基因组SNP数据探索了野狗与乡村狗、现代品种狗和狼的关系,并讨论了这些发现对正在进行的关于野狗身份和命名法的辩论的影响。重要的是,尽管关于如何称呼野狗以及它们是否是一个完整的物种存在争议,但这些动物代表了一个重要的、独特的、独特的进化单位,作为一个本土物种,值得高度保护。人们越来越担心家养狗的基因会传播到澳洲野狗种群中,尤其是在澳大利亚东南部,以及这对保护目标的影响。然而,在澳洲野狗中发现的生物地理细分,对目前用于估计狗与澳洲野狗祖先的方法的准确性提出了质疑。我提醒科学家和野生动物管理者,在评估DNA测试结果时,要仔细考虑当前祖先评估方法的局限性。未来使用全基因组DNA技术来改善对澳洲野狗祖先的估计,将对正在进行的关于澳洲野狗是什么、如何识别澳洲野狗以及如何保护它们的辩论至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信