Annals of Library and Information Studies最新文献_第6页

Scientific publication process and its impact on growth of science 科学出版过程及其对科学发展的影响

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.31709

Y. S. Rao

引用次数: 3

Outsourcing of activities and services in academic libraries 高校图书馆的活动和服务外包

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.37299

S. Sawant

引用次数: 0

Research productivity of newly established central universities in India 印度新建中央大学的研究生产力

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.40172

引用次数: 5

Use of MARC21 control field data in University Library OPACs in Karnataka: A study MARC21控制场数据在卡纳塔克邦大学图书馆OPAC中的应用研究

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.35116

Vasantha Raju Chandrappaa, N. S. Harinarayanac

{"title":"Use of MARC21 control field data in University Library OPACs in Karnataka: A study","authors":"Vasantha Raju Chandrappaa, N. S. Harinarayanac","doi":"10.56042/alis.v68i1.35116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v68i1.35116","url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses about importance of MARC21 control field and its effective implementation in university libraries OPACs in Karnataka. The catalogue records available through library web OPACs of universities under study formed the data source for this study. The university library web OPACs which we examined in this study have used Koha ILMS. One thousand and eighty-eight (1088) records were randomly selected from the nine university library web OPACs for the study. The study examined the proper implementation of 008 control field of MARC21, which is an important data element in information retrieval. The study found that average length of a cataloguing record was 1572.78 characters. The study as also revealed that libraries web OPACs under study have given scant attention for control fields, 001 and 003 were the two tag numbers that have been used extensively. Overall the university libraries have neglected control fields data element in their OPACs. This adversely affect the data retrieval from the user point of view. The study strongly recommend that libraries should fill up the data required for control fields while cataloguing their records.","PeriodicalId":42973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41959565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

A quantitative analysis of Lis Links discussion forum Lis Links论坛的定量分析

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.40396

Mohit Garga, Uma Kanjilalb

引用次数: 1

Pattern of social media engagements by the learners of a library and information science MOOC course: an analytical study 图书馆情报学MOOC课程学习者社交媒体参与模式的分析研究

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.38038

Debashis Naskar, Nabi Hasan, Anup Kumar Das

引用次数: 2

Measuring the applicability of user-generated social tags along with expert-generated LCSH descriptors in Sociology: a heuristic study 衡量用户生成的社交标签和专家生成的LCSH描述符在社会学中的适用性：一项启发式研究

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v68i1.36726

Kalyan Sundar Samantaa, Durga Sankar Rathb

{"title":"Measuring the applicability of user-generated social tags along with expert-generated LCSH descriptors in Sociology: a heuristic study","authors":"Kalyan Sundar Samantaa, Durga Sankar Rathb","doi":"10.56042/alis.v68i1.36726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v68i1.36726","url":null,"abstract":"The study attempts to compare user-generated social tags with expert-generated LCSH descriptors of one thousand sociology books. The objective is to examine if social tags can be used to enhance the accessibility of library collections. The study found that both datasets do not follow the same vocabulary. Though, the Spearmans’ rank correlation (0.89) indicates a good association between common terms in both vocabularies. The Jaccard similarity coefficient (J = 0.13, 0.14, 0.17, 0.15 and 0.16) in different word clusters proves that top frequent social tags and top frequent LCSH descriptors used by users and experts are different. The comparison with each book also reveals that 555 books (55.5%) have 50 to 100 percent matching between both vocabularies. LCSH descriptor vocabulary contains more subject terms (24) than social tag vocabulary (12) out of the top thirty frequent terms. The comparison of social tags with MARC subfields ($a, $x, $y, $z, $v) reveals that users use more or less all the subfield terms as tags but either they do not use chronological terms ($y) for tags or use different terms other than experts for chronological information. Further, comparison with each book title reveals that social tags alongside LCSH descriptors can enhance the title-based search of libraries. Moreover, the study suggests that usage of social tags will not only enhance the accessibilities of library resources under sociology but also complement to controlled vocabularies by supplementing a variety of terms other than experts.","PeriodicalId":42973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47020580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Towards unified retrieval system for GLAM institutions in India: Designing a prototype for biblio-cultural information space 面向印度GLAM机构的统一检索系统:一个文献文化信息空间的原型设计

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v69i1.58292

Anirban Dutta, Parthasarathi Mukhopadhyay

引用次数: 0

Contribution of academic libraries towards sustainable development goals 高校图书馆对可持续发展目标的贡献

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v69i1.56234

引用次数: 0

How collaborative is Indian academia? A case study of top three ranked institutions 印度学术界的合作程度如何？排名前三的机构的案例研究

IF 0.6

Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175

Bhaskar Mukherjee, Ankit Singh

{"title":"How collaborative is Indian academia? A case study of top three ranked institutions","authors":"Bhaskar Mukherjee, Ankit Singh","doi":"10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175","url":null,"abstract":"The present study employs bibliometric methods to examine the pattern of existing collaboration in India’s top three ranked academic institutes using publications indexed in the Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2020. The results show although the number of collaborations and the degree of collaboration have increased over time, however, the collaboration coefficient remains almost the same in the three institutes. The lesser negative Pearson correlation between authors and articles with a higher positive Pearson correlation between articles and citations for JNU publications suggests that collaboration with a smaller group is more successful than a larger group for gaining citations. Collaborative publications of Banaras Hindu University (36%) and Indian Institute of Science (33%) are more inclined towards authors of the same department, while for Jawaharlal Nehru University, it is with other authors from different universities (41%). The foreign collaboration for all three institutes is almost the same. The network visualization of collaboration in three institutes suggests that the collaborative research in IISc is more diverse than JNU or BHU and in national collaboration, distance between two national organizations also play an important role for strong collaboration. Overall, theoretical aspects of physics lead in collaborative publications followed by chemical sciences. Agricultural biotechnology, clinical medicine, polymer sciences and nanoscience are some emerging disciplines where organizations are increasing their participation through collaborative research.","PeriodicalId":42973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46964643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1