发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Cosmological Argument against Physicalism 反对物理主义的宇宙学论证
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1938
M. Wahlberg
{"title":"A Cosmological Argument against Physicalism","authors":"M. Wahlberg","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1938","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1938","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I present a Leibnizian cosmological argument to the conclusion that either the totality of physical beings has a non-physical cause, or a necessary being exists. The crucial premise of the argument is a restricted version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, namely the claim that every contingent physical phenomenon has a sufficient cause (PSR-P). I defend this principle by comparing it with a causal principle that is fundamental for physicalism, namely the Causal Closure of Physics, which says that every physical effect has a sufficient physical cause (CC). I find that the evidence for Causal Closure is weaker than the evidence for PSR-P, which means that physicalists who take CC to be justified must concede that PSR-P is also justified, and to a higher degree. Since my Leibnizian cosmological argument succeeds if PSR-P is granted, I conclude that physicalists must either give up CC and thereby physicalism, or accept that a necessary being exists.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126518764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology 直觉与论证:自然神学论证的认知基础
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1934
H. Cruz, J. Smedt
{"title":"Intuitions and Arguments: Cognitive Foundations of Argumentation in Natural Theology","authors":"H. Cruz, J. Smedt","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1934","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the cognitive foundations of natural theology: the intuitions that provide the raw materials for religious arguments, and the social context in which they are defended or challenged. We show that the premises on which natural theological arguments are based rely on intuitions that emerge early in development, and that underlie our expectations for everyday situations, e.g., about how causation works, or how design is recognized. In spite of the universality of these intuitions, the cogency of natural theological arguments remains a matter of continued debate. To understand why they are controversial, we draw on social theories of reasoning and argumentation.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126601850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Natural Theology, Evidence, and Epistemic Humility 自然神学，证据和认知谦卑
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1924
T. Dougherty, Brandon Rickabaugh
{"title":"Natural Theology, Evidence, and Epistemic Humility","authors":"T. Dougherty, Brandon Rickabaugh","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1924","url":null,"abstract":"One not infrequently hears rumors that the robust practice of natural theology reeks of epistemic pride. Paul Moser’s is a paradigm of such contempt. In this paper we defend the robust practice of natural theology from the charge of epistemic pride. In taking an essentially Thomistic approach, we argue that the evidence of natural theology should be understood as a species of God’s general self-revelation. Thus, an honest assessment of that evidence need not be prideful, but can be an act of epistemic humility, receiving what God has offered, answering God’s call. Lastly, we provide criticisms of Moser’s alternative approach, advancing a variety of philosophical and theological problems against his conception of personifying evidence.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115582698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Jean-Luc Marion on the Divine and Taking the "Third Way" 让-吕克·马里恩的神,“第三条道路”
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1939
Panu-Matti Pöykkoö
{"title":"Jean-Luc Marion on the Divine and Taking the \"Third Way\"","authors":"Panu-Matti Pöykkoö","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1939","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I will investigate Jean-Luc Marion’s influential critique of metaphysical and natural theological approaches to the divine which he regards as “idolatrous”, and his own proposal of an “iconic” account of God’s revelation which he calls the “third way”. Marion’s idol-icon distinction, I maintain, developed in his early work “God without Being”, is the guiding thread of Marion’s philosophical project, and the key for an adequate understanding of his own account. While Marion’s account is compelling and has provided new perspectives and insights to the contemporary discussion in philosophy of religion, its uncompromising excessiveness and the outright rejection of all hermeneutics leaves it deeply problematic and makes it hard to see how to follow his “third way”.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114372170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adam Green and Eleonore Stump (eds.): Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge University Press 2016 亚当·格林、埃莉奥诺·斯顿普主编:《隐藏的神性与宗教信仰:新视角》。剑桥大学出版社2016
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1947
T. Taber
{"title":"Adam Green and Eleonore Stump (eds.): Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge University Press 2016","authors":"T. Taber","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1947","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123102340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Signs for a People Who Reason" : Religious Experience and Natural Theology “一个理性的人的标志”:宗教经验和自然神学
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1937
Amber L. Griffioen
{"title":"\"Signs for a People Who Reason\" : Religious Experience and Natural Theology","authors":"Amber L. Griffioen","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1937","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I examine various philosophical approaches to religious experience and natural theology and look at some ways in which the former might be relevant for the latter. I argue that by thinking more about oft-overlooked or -underemphasized understandings of a) what might constitute religious experience and b) what functions natural theology might serve, we can begin to develop a more nuanced approach to natural theological appeals to religious experience — one that makes use of materially mediated religious experience to develop a natural theology more sensitive to the varieties of experience of lived religion “on the ground”","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126465297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Trent Dougherty and Justin P. McBrayer (eds.): Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press 2014 Trent Dougherty和Justin P. McBrayer(编):《怀疑有神论:新散文》。牛津大学出版社，2014
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1945
Tyron Goldschmidt
{"title":"Trent Dougherty and Justin P. McBrayer (eds.): Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press 2014","authors":"Tyron Goldschmidt","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1945","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"715 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133630997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lutheran Perspective on Natural Theology 路德宗对自然神学的看法
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-06-19 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1936
Ilmari Karimies
{"title":"Lutheran Perspective on Natural Theology","authors":"Ilmari Karimies","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I2.1936","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Martin Luther’s view of Natural theology and natural knowledge of God. Luther research has often taken a negative stance towards a possibility of Natural theology in Luther’s thought. I argue, that one actually finds from Luther’s texts a limited area of the natural knowledge of God. This knowledge pertains to the existence of God as necessary and as Creator, but not to what God is concretely. Luther appears to think that the natural knowledge of God is limited because of the relation between God and the Universe only one side is known by natural capacities. Scholastic Theology built on Aristotelianism errs, according to Luther, when it uses created reality as the paradigm for thinking about God. Direct experiential knowledge of the divinity, given by faith, is required to comprehend the divine being. Luther’s criticism of Natural theology, however, does not appear to rise from a general rejection of metaphysics, but from that Luther follows certain ideas of Medieval Augustinian Platonism, such as a stark ontological differentiation between finite and infinite things, as well as the idea of divine uniting contradictions. Thus the conflict between faith and reason on Luther seems to be explicable at least in part as a conflict between two different ontological systems, which follow different paradigms of rationality.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134084224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An epistemological corrective to doctrines of assurance 对确信学说的认识论纠正
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-05-03 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1869
J. Rutledge
{"title":"An epistemological corrective to doctrines of assurance","authors":"J. Rutledge","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1869","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1869","url":null,"abstract":"Many Christian traditions affirm a doctrine of assurance. According to this doctrine, those who are saved have assurance of their own salvation; that is, the doctrine of assurance tells us that the elect can know their status as elect. In this paper, I explore two developments of the doctrine of assurance by theologians (i.e. John Calvin & Kenneth Keathley) and argue that they fail to accommodate the fallibilistic nature of human knowing. I then develop a fallibilistic doctrine of assurance, which makes such assurance available to most Christians, and respond to an objection from the camp of pragmatic encroachment.","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122683745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Response to Jordan 对约旦的回应
European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion Pub Date : 2017-05-03 DOI: 10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1807
J. Schellenberg
{"title":"Response to Jordan","authors":"J. Schellenberg","doi":"10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1807","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24204/EJPR.V9I1.1807","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":428491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116777440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信