Liverpool Law Review最新文献_第6页

The Place of International Human Rights Law in the Territorial Non-State Entities. The case of Taiwan and Territorial Non-State Entities from the Post-Soviet Space 国际人权法在属地非国家实体中的地位。台湾与后苏联空间的领土非国家实体的案例

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09311-9

Lucia Leontiev

引用次数: 0

The Rise of the Mailbox Rule and Formation of Contracts in English, US and Canadian Law 邮箱规则的兴起与英美加三国法律中合同的形成

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-07-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09301-x

M. Kovač

引用次数: 0

The Significance of R(BG and Anor) v Suffolk CC (2021): Meeting ‘Eligible Need[s]’ in Social Care? R（BG和Anor）诉萨福克CC（2021）的意义：满足社会护理中的“合格需求”？

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-07-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09310-w

A. Diver, B. Schwehr

引用次数: 0

The Hermeneutics of the Concept of Misrepresentation: Addressing the Quagmire of Damages and Compensation in Cases of Misrepresentation in Formation of a Contract Under Indian and English Law 失实陈述概念的解释学:解决印度和英国法下订立合同中失实陈述案件中损害赔偿的困境

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09303-9

Gautam Mohanty, Gaurav Rai

{"title":"The Hermeneutics of the Concept of Misrepresentation: Addressing the Quagmire of Damages and Compensation in Cases of Misrepresentation in Formation of a Contract Under Indian and English Law","authors":"Gautam Mohanty, Gaurav Rai","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09303-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09303-9","url":null,"abstract":"In England, fraudulent misrepresentation is governed by English common law and damages are provided under the Tort of Deceit whereas negligent and innocent misrepresentation is governed by the Misrepresentation Act, 1967. In India, fraud is governed by s 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (ICA) and misrepresentation by s 18 of the ICA. Notably, unlike in England where the remedies for fraud and misrepresentation are provided at separate avenues, in India, the relief to the innocent party in both cases is provided under s 19 of the ICA. This article discusses fraudulent misrepresentation & negligent/innocent misrepresentation and the quantification of damages thereof in contracts under the two legal regimes mentioned above. To that extent, the authors attempt to illustrate certain nuanced differences between the two legal regimes while also highlighting the similarities between English law and Indian law. For the purposes of this article, the authors refer to the Misrepresentation Act, 1967 and the seminal judgments of Derry v Peek, Doyle v Olby, East v Maurer and Smith New Court Securities Ltd. v Scrimgeour Vickers and discuss the “date of transaction rule” as enunciated by Lord Steyn while juxtaposing it with the judgments of the High Court of Delhi, and the Supreme Court of India. In the Indian context, the authors highlight the position of law as is apparent from two recent judgments of the Delhi High Court in NHAI v Pune Sholapur Road Development and Daiichi Sankyo v Malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors and also focus on the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Avitel Post Stuidoz v HSBC Holdings (Mauritius).","PeriodicalId":42661,"journal":{"name":"Liverpool Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138525199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Ambivalent Notion of ‘Fundamental Breach’ in Indian Law of Contract: Towards a New Paradigm 印度合同法中“基本违约”的矛盾概念:走向新范式

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09300-y

Saloni Khanderia

引用次数: 1

Divergence and Convergence in the Law of Contractual Penalties and Liquidated Damages Clauses in England, Singapore, and Malaysia 英国、新加坡和马来西亚合同处罚和违约金条款法律的差异与趋同

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09309-3

Joshua Teng, Kailash Kalaiarasu

{"title":"Divergence and Convergence in the Law of Contractual Penalties and Liquidated Damages Clauses in England, Singapore, and Malaysia","authors":"Joshua Teng, Kailash Kalaiarasu","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09309-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09309-3","url":null,"abstract":"Contracts often make provision for the remedies available upon breach, i.e., by providing for a sum or stipulation available to either party upon breach by the other (an ‘agreed damages clause’). A persistent question is whether, and to what extent, such clauses are enforceable. In this paper, we analyse the convergences and divergences between Malaysia, Singapore, and England, in particular following decisions in the apex courts. These clauses are always enforceable under s 75 of the Malaysian Contracts Act 1950, albeit up to the point of ‘reasonable compensation’ only. Whereas, in Singapore and England, if the clause is found to be a ‘penalty’ it is liable to be unenforceable in toto. Malaysian law also differs in that a truncated assessment for ‘reasonable compensation’ is provided for in statute. We argue that the ‘proportionality’ and ‘legitimate interest’ elements in the Cavendish analysis, over the compensatory-centric analysis in Denka Advantech, may be a better fit with the concept of ‘reasonable compensation’ under Malaysian law, and may give content to the statutory interpretation of the phrase in future cases.","PeriodicalId":42661,"journal":{"name":"Liverpool Law Review","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138525220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Construing the Written Warranty 构成书面保证

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09302-w

Manasi Kumar, Nishtha Pant

引用次数: 0

Unconscionability of E-contracts: A Comparative Study of India, the United Kingdom, and the United States 电子合同的无意识：印度、英国和美国的比较研究

IF 1

Liverpool Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s10991-022-09306-6

Dharmita Prasad, P. Mishra

引用次数: 1

Thought Crime and the Treason Act 1351 1351年的《思想罪和叛国罪法