Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum最新文献

{"title":"Pengangkatan Anak tanpa Penetapan Mahkamah Syar’iyah: Aktivitas Sosial, Kepastian Hukum di Nagan Raya, Aceh","authors":"Syarifah Rahmatillah, Mahlil Ridwan","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.15791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.15791","url":null,"abstract":"Child raising is the transfer of the legal position of the child from the parent to the parent. In practice, the raising of children is usually carried out by persons who, in their marriage, do not produce offspring. The process of raising children in Indonesia has been regulated in PP No. 54 of 2007 on the Enforcement of Child Abduction and Permensos No. 110 of 2009 on the Conditions of Deprivation of Children. However, in practice, many children are raised by society in ways that are not in accordance with the rules. The problem that is investigated in this script is how the raising practices are carried out by the people of Kecamatan Tadu Raya and how the review of the Indonesian legal system is related to the implementation of the raising of children carried out in Kecamatan Tudu Raya. In this study, the author uses the method of the Yuridis empirical approach, which is to study the norms or rules that form the foundation and see the application of these rules in the life of society. The findings of this study revealed that child raising in the district of Tadu Raya is only implemented through the process of oral agreement between the parent raising with the parent of the child with the factor has not yet had children in the family, as well as the economic factor of the family raising the sense of disappointment to raise the child, the parent is also positioned as a child even though the relationship with the parents of his child is not decided. According to the Indonesian legal system, the practice of raising a child is not in accordance with positive law and Islamic law. So the practice of raising children in the Tadu Raya is only a social activity that does not follow the applicable legal process.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"28 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116346100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Amnesti: Hak Prerogatif Presiden dalam Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah","authors":"Mutiara Fahmi Razali, Azmil Umur, Sinta Kartika Putri","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.15218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.15218","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the granting of amnesty to perpetrators of political crimes by the President of the Republic of Indonesia. This authority is regulated in the Basic Law of the Republic of Indonesia, 1945, Article 14 paragraph (2), and Emergency Law Number 11, 1954, Article 1 on Amnesty and Abolition. Both of these rules do not specifically describe the limitations or types of criminal acts that amnesty may be granted to. The amnesty granted by the President to Baiq Nuril, a victim of sexual harassment involved in cases of infringement of the Information and Electronic Transactions Act, was carried out on the basis of humanity and justice. This policy has influenced the historical changes in amnesty law aimed at non-political cases. The study aims to examine the authority of the President of Indonesia in granting amnesty, reviewed from a fiqh siyasah perspective. Data is obtained through library studies and analyzed using a normative or doctrinal approach. The results of the study show that the granting of amnesty by the president is a prerogative of the president, as stipulated in the Basic Law of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. But in fiqh siyasah, the essence of amnesty is forgiveness. Forgiveness is the prerogative of the head of state, aimed at creating greater crimes, and does not violate the provisions of the law that have been established. The President's policy of granting amnesty in non-political cases is in accordance with the provisions of the fiqh siyasah, because the concept of amnesty in the law and the notion of forgiveness in the fiqh siyasah are equally based on the interests of the state and the crime of the community. Historical facts show that the Prophet Muhammad and the caliphs after him gave forgiveness to rebels, war criminals, and non-political criminals.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122150191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Restoratif Justice, Diversi dan Peradilan Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110/Puu-X/2012","authors":"Dedy Sumardi, M. Mansari, Maulana Fickry Albaba","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.16010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.16010","url":null,"abstract":"The Constitutional Court, by Decision No. 110/Law-X/2012, repealed Articles 96, 100, and 101 of Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System, which establishes penalties for judges, prosecutors, and investigators who do not seek discrimination against children who face the law. These provisions have no more binding legal force for judges, police, and prosecutors who do not perform their duties. The study focuses on the implementation of diversity and the impact of child protection before and after the Constitutional Court rulings. The interview data is obtained from the Banda Aceh State Court, supported by library data, and analyzed using a juridico-empirical approach. Based on the analysis of the data, it was found that the execution of diversion in the Banda Aceh State Court before the birth of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 110/PUU-X/2012 was in accordance with the regulations of the laws in force and was accompanied by the threat of criminal offenses. After the birth of the judgment of the Constitutional Court, the execution of differences is an obligation that must be carried out by the judge but is not accompanied by the threat of a criminal offense for a judge who does not perform it. The impact of the ruling of the Constitutional Court is that there is no criminal threat to the judge, JPU, and investigator because the Constitutional Court ruling has declared Articles 96, 100, and 101 to have no binding legal force. Nevertheless, the duty of diversification remains a duty that must be enforced by law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124298896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kewajiban Penyegeraan Pendaftaran Haji: Kajian Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2020","authors":"Tarmizi M. Jakfar, Muji Mulia, Y. Yusrizal","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.17676","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.17676","url":null,"abstract":"Based on information from Susenas 2017, there are about 13 million Indonesian Muslims who are already economically well-off for the hajj list, but do not register for the hajj. In response to this, MUI has issued a fatwa for people aged 60 to register immediately, worried about running out of fees and making up hajj and MUI stipulates that it is forbidden for them to delay. The research questions are: how is MUI's consideration in determining the obligation to immediately register for hajj for those who meet the criteria and how is MUI's consideration in determining the prohibition of delaying for those who meet the criteria. This research is classified as a type of qualitative research and is included in the normative study and the process of collecting data using the literature method is then analyzed with a descriptive analysis approach. The results found are that it is mandatory for people aged 60 years to register for Hajj immediately because of the hadith that states the average age of the Prophet Muhammad's people is 60-70 years, while the waiting period for departure is very long, for people who are worried about running out of money because it is analogous to the obligation to leave on Friday. at, and for qada hajj because there is a consensus of friends. As for the consideration of the prohibition of postponing the age of 60 because it is a sin to neglect worship, for people who are worried about running out of hajj fees because they violate the law from the results of analogies and for those who make up qada because they consider the consensus of friends.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127383753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Syari’at Islam dan Qanun Jinayat di Aceh","authors":"Hasanuddin Yusuf Adan","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13447","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The history of the implementation of Islamic law in Aceh has taken a very long time since the colonial era to the reform era in Indonesia. All of this happened more because of the government and government that started from the Dutch East Indies government to the Old Order, New Order and Reformation. However, in the end, the Law for the implementation of Islamic Shari'ah in Aceh came down from Jakarta, starting with the Law. No. 44 of 1999 concerning the Privileges of Aceh up to Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. As a mandate from the law, a number of laws were born to complete the operational implementation of Islamic law in Aceh. This study uses historical research methods because the study of material is related to the history of the implementation of Islamic law in Aceh. The findings of this study indicate that the struggle for the implementation of Islamic law in Aceh requires a long struggle so that it meets with success.Abstrak: Sejarah pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di Aceh mengalami uluran waktu yang sangat panjang semenjak zaman kolonial sampai kepada zaman reformasi di Indonesia. Semua itu terjadi lebih disebabkan oleh perjalanan pemerintahan dan birokrasi yang bermula dari pemerintahan Hindia Belanda sampai kepada rezim Orde Lama, Orde Baru dan Orde Reformasi. Walaubagaimanapun, akhirnya Undang-undang pemberlakuan syari’at Islam di Aceh turun dari Jakarta, mulai dari Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 1999 Tentang Keistimewaan Aceh sampai kepada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Sebagai amanah dari undang-undang tersebut maka lahirlah sejumlah qanun untuk melengkapi perangkat operasional pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di Aceh. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian historis karena kajian materinya terkait dengan pemaparan sejarah pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di Aceh. Hasil temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perjuangan pelaksanaan syari’at Islam di aceh memerlukan perjuangan panjang sehingga ketemu dengan kesuksesan.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116084740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bahasa Hukum Qanun Jinayat Aceh: Teks Lama untuk Konteks Baru","authors":"Ali Abubakar, M. Din","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13450","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This paper begins with the problem of differences in public perception and law enforcement in enforcing the Qanun Jinayat. The main question to be answered is how to understand the legal language of the Qanun in the concept of the relationship between the text and the legal context? Several legal terms and concepts in the Qanun were selected for analysis. The results of the study indicate that the terms and concepts in the Qanun which are different from the language of the law in Indonesia show the characteristics of the law itself. The choice of the legal language of the Qanun reinforces that the law must change according to changing contexts; namely modern Acehnese society. However, the text of the Qanun itself, due to changes in context, cannot be separated from the possibility of changes/adjustments.Abstrak: Tulisan ini berawal dari permasalahan perbedaan persepsi masyarakat dan aparatur penegakan hukum dalam penegakan Qanun Jinayat. Pertanyaan utama yang ingin dijawab adalah bagaimana memahami bahasa hukum Qanun dalam konsep hubungan antara teks dan konteks hukum? Beberapa istilah hukum dan konsep dalam Qanun dipilih sebagai bahan analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa istilah-istilah dan konsep-konsep dalam Qanun yang berbeda dengan bahasa perundang-undangan di Indonesia menunjukkan ciri dari hukum itu sendiri. Pilihan bahasa hukum Qanun menguatkan bahwa hukum harus berubah sesuai dengan perubahan konteks; yaitu masyarakat Aceh modern. Namun demikian, teks Qanun itu sendiri, karena perubahan konteks tidak terlepas dari kemungkinan perubahan/penyesuaian.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122297480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Non-Muslim Sebagai Subjek Hukum Islam dalam Konsep Mukallaf","authors":"Zainuddin Puteh, Faisar Ananda Arfa","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13763","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13763","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The appointment of the Prophet Muhammad Shalla Allahu 'Alaihi Wa Sallam as an Apostle who brought revelations with legal dimensions, addressed to all humans, including unbelievers. The position of the infidels as mukallaf can be seen from the perspective of the da'wah community, not the ijabah community who accept and justify the teachings of the Apostle as believers. However, even though they are mukallaf, unbelievers are also seen as not fulfilling as legal subjects in the law of worship, because of their disbelief. Unbelief is seen as a barrier to the validity of worship. This study uses the doctrinal method. The data is obtained through the treasures of Islamic law. The results of the study found that non-Muslims are also legal subjects in muamalah matters. Islamic law can be fully enforced against infidels, because disbelief is not a barrier (mani') the fulfillment of elements as legal subjects for infidels, so that rights that are mu'amalah should not be ignored, especially in the area of application of Islamic law.Abstrak: Pengangkatan Nabi Muhammad Shalla Allahu ‘Alaihi Wa Sallam sebagai Rasul yang membawa wahyu berdimensi hukum, ditujukan kepada seluruh manusia, termasuk orang kafir. Kedudukan orang kafir sebagai mukallaf bisa dilihat dari segi ummat dakwah, bukan ummat ijabah yang menerima dan membenarkan ajaran Rasul sebagaimana orang mukmin. Namun, meskipun sebagai mukallaf, orang kafir juga dipandang tidak memenuhi sebagai subyek hukum dalam hukum ibadah, karena kekafirannya. Kekafiran dipandang sebagai penghalang dalam keabsahan ibadah. Kajian ini menggunakan metode doktrinal. Data diperoleh melalui khazanah hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa non muslim juga sebagai subjek hukum dalam persoalan mua’amalah. Hukum Islam dapatdiberlakukan penuh terhadap orang kafir, karena kekafiran bukan sebagai penghalang (mani’) terpenuhinya unsur sebagai subyek hukum bagi orang kafir, sehingga hak-hak yang bersifat mu'amalah tidak boleh diabaikan khsusnya di wilayah pemberlakuan hukum Islam.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133297196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dayah dan Rehabilitasi Akhlak Pelaku Jarimah: Perspektif Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014","authors":"M. Khalidi, Arifin Abdullah","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.12762","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.12762","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Dayah is the center of Islamic educational institutions for the people of Aceh, which aims to create human beings besides having knowledge but also changing the personality of the community in an Islamic way, it is proven that dayah has an important role in educating the Acehnese people to remain Islamic solidity in a Kaffah way, when problems arise from community resolved by the dayah ulama, meaning that the dayah has an important role in addition to education, the dayah is also a place of settlement that occurs in society, especially those related to violations of Islamic law, the community often asks for input and solutions from the dayah scholars. Therefore, the Acehnese people's desire to legally implement Islamic Shari'ah began to be implemented universally when the central government passed Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh, from Law No. 16 of 2006 was born Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Law Jinayat. However, along the way, it was felt that there were problems that had not been accommodated in the jinayah law, especially after the punishment of caning for the perpetrators of the fingerings, the perpetrators of the fingerings repeated their actions, meaning that there was a need for a place to rehabilitate the nature of the perpetrators so as not to repeat their actions. This paper reviews comprehensively about Dayah as a Moral Rehabilitation Center for the perpetrators of Jarimah Perspective Article 4 paragraph 5 Aceh Qanun Number 16 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law, while the method used is normative research that uses Jinayat Law Qanun as the primary material, and the data uses a qualitative approach. descriptive. The results of the study found that the Qanun of the Jinayat Law provided an opportunity for Dayah as a rehabilitation center for the perpetrators of the crime that was contained in an additional uqubat.Abstrak: Dayah merupakan pusat lembaga pendidikan Islami bagi masyarakat Aceh, yang bertujuan untuk menciptakan manusia-manusia selain memiliki ilmu pengetahuan juga merubah kepribadian masyarakat secara Islami, terbukti dayah memiliki peranan penting mendidik masyarakat Aceh tetap kokoh menegakkan syariat Islam secara Kaffah, ketika ada masalah yang muncul dari kalangan masyarakat diselesaikan oleh ulama dayah, artinya dayah memiliki peranan yang penting selain memberikan dibidang pendidikan, dayah juga menjadi tempat penyelesaian perselisihan yang terjadi dalam masyarakat terutama yang berkaitan dengan pelanggaran Syari’at Islam, masyarakat sering meminta masukan dan solusi dari para ulama-ulama dayah. Oleh karenanya keinginan masyarakat Aceh untuk menjalankan Syari’at Islam secara legal tersebut mulai terimplementasi secara universal saat Pemerintah pusat mengesahkan yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh, dari Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 inilah lahir Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Namun dalam perjalanannya dirasakan ada permasalahan ","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122550772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dari Pelaku ke Korban Penyelundupan Pekerja Migran Sukarela: Pilihan Hukum Internasional atau Hukun Indonesia","authors":"Y. Sirait, Dian Narwastuty","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.13722","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Migrant smuggling and human trafficking are two actions that are often equated. Though both are distinct in terms of profit and purpose. Migrant smuggling can occur because of consensus between migrants and smugglers. In contrast to the perpetrators, international law encourages the non-criminalization policy to migrant. However, the practice of countries including Indonesia still provides chance for criminalization of migrants. This study aims to examine the impact of migrants volunteering to be smuggled in as victims. Furthermore, the potential for migrants to be punished for violating the rules for entering without a permit into a country is also studied. This research was conducted doctrinally using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the volunteering of migrants to be smuggled should not their status to become perpetrators in perspective of international law. It means that migrants should be punished for being smuggled. However, national laws, including those regulated in Indonesia, still allow migrants to be punished for violating the rules regarding entry permits such as the use of fake documents. This shows the lack of consistency in national laws to adopt non-criminalization policies towards migrants.Abstrak: Penyelundupan migran dan perdagangan orang adalah dua tindakan yang kerap dipersamakan. Padahal keduanya berbeda dari sisi keuntungan dan tujuan. Penyelundupan migran dapat terjadi karena adanya konsensus antara migran dengan pelaku penyelundupan. Berbeda dengan pelaku, hukum internasional mendorong kebijakan non-kriminalisasi terhadap migran. Namun sayangnya, praktik negara termasuk Indonesia masih memberikan ruang untuk kriminalisasi terhadap migran. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji dampak kesukarelaan migran untuk diselundupkan sebagai korban. Lebih lanjut, dikaji juga potensi migran dipidana karena melanggar aturan masuk tanpa izin ke suatu negara. Penilitian ini dilakukan secara doktrinal menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kesukarelaan migran untuk diselundupkan tidak membuat status dan kedudukannya berubah menjadi pelaku. Konsekuensinya, migran tetap tidak boleh dipidana dengan alasan apapun. Namun hukum nasional termasuk yang diatur di Indonesia masih memungkinkan migran dipidana karena melanggar aturan terkait izin masuk seperti penggunaan dokumen palsu. Hal ini menunjukan kurang konsistennya hukum nasional mengadopsi kebijakan non-kriminalisasi terhadap migran.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125691616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Wewenang Mahkamah Syar’iyah dalam Pemeriksaan Praperadilan","authors":"Achmad Fikri Oslami","doi":"10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.11874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i1.11874","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The Syari'iyah Court is an Islamic Sharia Judicial Institution in Aceh as a Development of the Religious Courts which was inaugurated on 1 Muharram 1424 H/4 March 2003 AD based on Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2003. In accordance with Article 1 paragraph (1) of Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2003 the Religious Court in Aceh Province was changed to a Syar'iyah Court. The Syar'iyah Court has special powers that are different from the Religious Courts outside the province of Aceh. The Syar'iyah Court through Qanun number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law has the authority to hear cases in the Jinayat field in Aceh. As a consequence of the absolute authority of the Syar'iyah Court in the field of Jinayat, the Syar'iyah Court also handles cases related to Pretrial. Rules regarding Pretrial are regulated in Qanun number 7 of 2013 concerning the Jinayat Procedural Law. The Syar'iyah Court which often handles civil cases is a new thing when faced with pretrial cases. The purpose of this paper is to find out the legality and description of the pretrial examination at the Syar'iyah Court, so as to gain a comprehensive understanding of the process of examining the pretrial case.Abstrak. Mahkamah Syar'iyah adalah Lembaga Peradilan Syari’at Islam di Aceh sebagai Pengembangan dari Peradilan Agama yang diresmikan pada tanggal 1 Muharram 1424 H/ 4 Maret 2003 M berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 11 Tahun 2003. Sesuai Pasal 1 ayat (1) Keputusan Presiden RI Nomor 11 Tahun 2003 Pengadilan Agama yang ada di Provinsi Aceh diubah menjadi Mahkamah Syar'iyah. Mahkamah Syar’iyah mempunyai kewenangan khusus yang berbeda dari Pengadilan Agama yang ada di luar provinsi Aceh. Mahkamah Syar;iyah melalu Qanun nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat berwenang mengadili perkara-perkara di bidang Jinayat di Aceh. Konsekuensi adanya kewenangan absolut Mahkamah Syar;iyah di bidang Jinayat, maka Mahkamah Syar’iyah juga menangani perkara yang terkait Praperadilan. Aturan mengenai Praperadilan di atur di dalam Qanun nomor 7 tahun 2013 tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat. Mahkamah Syar’iyah yang sering menangani perkara perdata menjadi hal yang baru ketika dihadapkan dengan kasus  Praperadilan. Tujuan penulisan ini agar dapat mengetahui legalitas dan gambaran pemeriksaan Praperadilan di Mahkamah Syar’iyah, sehingga mendapatkan pemahaman yang komprehensif terkait proses pemeriksaan perkara Praperadilan tersebut.","PeriodicalId":424275,"journal":{"name":"Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131227048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}