Chinese Journal of Comparative Law最新文献_第2页

The New Validity Rules in Chinese Civil Code and Chinese State-owned Enterprises’ Freedom in Contracting: One Step Too Far 民法典效力新规则与国有企业承包自由：一步之遥

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-07-26 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac024

Hao Jiang, Antonia von Appen

{"title":"The New Validity Rules in Chinese Civil Code and Chinese State-owned Enterprises’ Freedom in Contracting: One Step Too Far","authors":"Hao Jiang, Antonia von Appen","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxac024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxac024","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Upon the enactment of Chinese Civil Code, the previous rules that allowed for enlarged state power to annul contracts such as General Principles of Civil Law article 58 §3 and Contract Law article 52 §1-§2 were dropped. Chinese law has gone one step further in promoting freedom of contract. The validity rules now have been streamlined and the previous contradictory and inconsistent treatment between civil juristic acts and contracts, state and private parties eliminated. However, the new legislative technique will unavoidably facilitate asset stripping, the very reason that the paternalistic rules were in place. Through a historical, doctrinal and logical lens, we will show why there can be no effective model of a neutral set of validity rules that could deal with state-owned enterprises in a less than free and competitive market. The only way to make it work is to have SOEs exit most of the competitive industries and focus on areas that serve the policy goals. Also, paternalistic rules concerning the validity of a contract in trading state-assets should be enacted either in the Civil Code or through special legislations and applicable to government, state-owned enterprises and private parties alike.","PeriodicalId":42366,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45516112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Insolvency Law and Policy in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: Academic Roundtable Proceedings 2019冠状病毒病及以后的破产法律和政策:学术圆桌会议记录

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac025

W. Wan, Xin Yan

引用次数: 0

China’s Stance on the Normativity of International Climate Change Law: An Interactional Account 中国对国际气候变化法规范性的立场：一个相互作用的解释

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac023

Feiyue Li

{"title":"China’s Stance on the Normativity of International Climate Change Law: An Interactional Account","authors":"Feiyue Li","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxac023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxac023","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Existing analytical accounts of China’s interactions with international law are underdeveloped. This article proposes the use of an interactional model to explain the normativity of international law from three perspectives: shared understandings, normative qualities of international law, and the reception of individual countries to these normative qualities. Furthermore, the interactional model is used to explain how conceptions of the normativity of international climate change law are developed in China. It finds that China has accepted the common responsibility system under an enhanced transparency framework, while adhering to the facilitative nature of international commitments to accommodate the needs of developing countries and stringently insisting on obligations of support from developed countries being met. In this, China’s position on the normative qualities of international climate change law is influenced by its international identities, power status, national interests, and domestic understandings of anthropogenic climate change. The interactional account that follows implies that future research on China’s interactions with international law should be cautious of both Western centrism and Chinese exceptionalism and consider both the legitimacy of international law and China’s own domestic context.","PeriodicalId":42366,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41881296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac012

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac019

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac006

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac013

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac002

引用次数: 2

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac003

引用次数: 0

OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件

IF 1.2

Chinese Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/cjcl/cxac014

引用次数: 1