发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Methodological Framework of Stance-Taking and Appraisal in the Parliament 议会立场采取与评估的方法论框架
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH006
Rahma Said Albusafi
{"title":"A Methodological Framework of Stance-Taking and Appraisal in the Parliament","authors":"Rahma Said Albusafi","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH006","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter proposes a methodological framework to study stance/appraisal in parliamentary discourse. Little previous research exists on the marking of stance/appraisal, despite its pervasiveness in such contexts. The researcher is currently unaware of any framework that has been developed to help analysts situate the phenomenon of stance-taking in parliamentary discourse. The first section defines the concept of parliament and discusses its roles as a political institution. The second section highlights specific features relevant to the nature of interaction in parliaments by considering the sequential nature of its discourse, shedding light on how stance is uttered and embedded in both parliamentary questions and parliamentary answers. The final section presents a proposed methodological framework combining Van Dijk's conceptual approach on parliamentary context, Du Bois's stance triangle, Ilie's account on political arguments, and Martin and White's Appraisal Framework to contextually and theoretically frame stance-taking in parliamentary discourse.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115581932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Gender Sensitivity in Parliamentary Discourse an Appraisal Approach 议会话语中的性别敏感:一种评价方法
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH009
Khanyile Khumalo
{"title":"Gender Sensitivity in Parliamentary Discourse an Appraisal Approach","authors":"Khanyile Khumalo","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH009","url":null,"abstract":"The call for gender equality has taken the world by storm in all facets of life. This study explores four gender-themed parliamentary debates for appraisal and evaluative language. The study was prompted by the increasing importance of parliaments in today's world and the role they play in shaping decisions that affect society. The appraisal theory has been used to analyze the evaluative language that was used by parliamentarians in gender themed parliamentary debates with the aim of finding out if members of parliament conform to the dictates of these instruments or if the appraisal and evaluative resources they use render them as gender sensitive or not. The corpus of the study has been four gender-themed parliamentary debates which were taken from the national assembly Hansard of 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. The study has concluded that there are mixed views in parliament with regards to gender equality and this is reflected in the presentations by the different speakers. Some members of parliament are gender sensitive while some are still insensitive.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115722221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Exploration of the Use of Emotional Discourse in Parliamentary Deliberations 情感话语在议会审议中的运用探讨
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH010
Magret Jongore
{"title":"An Exploration of the Use of Emotional Discourse in Parliamentary Deliberations","authors":"Magret Jongore","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH010","url":null,"abstract":"In Parliament, problem-solving argumentation calls for several thresholds of proof. This chapter presents the Rhetoric of Parliamentary. The role of such rhetoric is to articulate political motives and legitimize political action. This therefore calls for a review of language use as a concrete display of power: securing political power, challenging it, competing for it, or defending and consolidating it. In socio-historical periods marked by significant paradigm shifts and political polarizations, parliaments have played a decisive role in benchmarking current societal issues and exposing party-political agendas by debating the pros and cons of alternative political solutions. The chapter with the use of critical discourse analysis (CDA) reveals forms of power inherent in this discourse. CDA as a theoretical framework insists that there is no language that is neutral. Thus, CDA unravels unequal power relations, ideological inclinations and hegemony parliamentary discourse of this chapter.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127913431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intersubjective Stance and Argumentation in Zimbabwean Parliamentary Discourse 津巴布韦议会话语中的主体间立场与论证
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH005
Ernest Jakaza
{"title":"Intersubjective Stance and Argumentation in Zimbabwean Parliamentary Discourse","authors":"Ernest Jakaza","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH005","url":null,"abstract":"Language use in the parliament is a matter of stance taking and appraisal of others and the self-invoking systems of socio-cultural value and dis/alignments. This chapter examines the language of evaluation and appraisal in parliamentary debates and speeches. In order to account for the language of evaluation and stance in the parliament, the study evokes the appraisal resource of engagement. The research draws its analysis from the key notions of appraisal and argumentation theories focusing on how parliamentarians position themselves dis/aligning with co-participants. The research examines how the continuous process of alignment impacts on argumentation in parliamentary debates. The research concludes that intersubjective stance is an argumentative activity that involves pro and contra argumentation with parliamentarians critically testing propositions submitted in the dialogic space.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123277023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Greek Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis 经济危机时期的希腊议会话语
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH001
K. Frantzi, Marianthi Georgalidou, G. Giakoumakis
{"title":"Greek Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis","authors":"K. Frantzi, Marianthi Georgalidou, G. Giakoumakis","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH001","url":null,"abstract":"The present chapter deals with impoliteness and aggression in a parliamentary discourse. It is a corpus-based study and the language material examined consists of the Minutes of all Plenary Sessions of the Hellenic Parliament for the years 2011 to 2016. Impoliteness in the Parliament is defined as offensive verbal behavior contextualized by temporary breakdowns of formal procedures, intense protests by immediate recipients, the House Speaker and fellow parliamentarians and even the walkout of the sittings of offended parties. Reactions such as the aforementioned ones serve as markers of the unacceptable use of linguistic forms perceived as abusive which exceed the limits of politic speech in contexts of expected political rivalry. Detailed analysis of excerpts of discourse addressed to politicians reveals linguistic items that can serve as markers of aggression and facilitate analysis via corpus linguistics technologies and the statistic processing of findings which in our case confirms a shift towards more aggressive forms of speech in the Greek parliament after 2011.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134544617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
An Analysis of the Patterns of Code Switching in the Namibian Parliament 纳米比亚议会语码转换模式分析
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH008
Sussana Iipinge, R. Makamani, S. Ashikuti
{"title":"An Analysis of the Patterns of Code Switching in the Namibian Parliament","authors":"Sussana Iipinge, R. Makamani, S. Ashikuti","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines patterns of code switching in the Namibian Parliament as represented in the volumes of parliamentary Hansards from 2015 to 2017. In this chapter, a sample of 10 issues of the Namibian parliamentary Hansards were selected. The selected Hansards constituted a representative purposive sample of the Hansards produced by the Parliament of the Republic of Namibia from 2015 to 2017. The selection of the Hansards to form part of the sample depended on the availability of hard copies of the selected issues. Using purposive sampling was important in choosing the right sample for the study as some Hansards had fewer instances of code switching than others. It was important to select those with high frequencies of code switching.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125285178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parliamentary Immunity and the Issues Encountered in Turkey 议会豁免和在土耳其遇到的问题
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH002
O. Aydin
{"title":"Parliamentary Immunity and the Issues Encountered in Turkey","authors":"O. Aydin","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH002","url":null,"abstract":"Parliamentary immunity is the totality of the assurances provided to members of parliament (MPs) for the purpose of public interest. It originates from British parliamentary law. Parliamentary immunity aims to ensure that MPs can perform their legislative duty independently, without being pressurised. In Turkey, parliamentary immunity has been under constitutional protection since 1876, when the constitutional order began. It can be said that Turkey has two fundamental chronic problems when it comes to this matter. First, inviolability is misused to protect MPs against allegations of corruption. Second, there are no objective criteria regarding the lifting of inviolability. This situation provides ruling parties having parliamentary majority with a wide discretionary power and creates a tool for putting political pressure on the deputies of opposition parties. Besides this, the constitutional amendment made in 2016 has brought about many problems and caused the political sphere and freedom of speech to be diminished.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129689072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Rule Flouting as Argumentation Strategy 作为论证策略的规则藐视
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH003
O. Chikara, Collen Sabao
{"title":"Rule Flouting as Argumentation Strategy","authors":"O. Chikara, Collen Sabao","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH003","url":null,"abstract":"Parliamentary discourse is rule-governed with controlled diction, specific as well as documented protocol and standing orders in place, one would expect that parliament is a place where all is serene and actors are as “honourable” as they are titled. Recent events in most African parliaments have proven that the serenity expected from parliament is anything near reality. Language use is at times foul and conduct dishonourable. The rules of the house are flouted and when such happens it is usually deemed “un-parliamentary.” Though “un-parliamentary” such language and behaviour can be seen as a form of argumentation. Argumentation, which is the primary activity that parliamentarians are involved in whenever there is a sitting has been defined as a verbal, social, and reasoned activity aimed at convincing critics of the acceptability of an argument by putting forward a number of propositions justifying or refuting the proposition expressed in the standpoint This chapter looks at the argumentation within un-parliamentary behaviour which flouts parliamentary discoursal conventions.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122684332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ad Hominem in Argumentation 论证中的人身攻击
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH004
J. Amakali, J. Kangira, B. Ekanjume-Ilongo
{"title":"Ad Hominem in Argumentation","authors":"J. Amakali, J. Kangira, B. Ekanjume-Ilongo","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH004","url":null,"abstract":"Emotional arguments (ad hominem) are messages directed to attacking a person, sidestepping the logical argument. In parliament, members of Parliament (MPs) use emotional arguments and language to influence their opponent or audience attitudes and behavior. While it may be argued that ad hominem attacks are effective in argumentation, it is also observed that they might have a bad effect on either the speaker or the audience. This chapter demonstrates how some MPs used stylistic devices such as anti-thesis, sarcasm, provocation, rhetorical questions and invectives to appeal to the recipients' emotions. Relying on MPs' speeches found in the Hansard of the Namibian Parliament, the authors show that although ad hominem in parliamentary debates brought some bad feelings to the recipients, they were generally intended for positive effects of winning arguments. These findings are essential in distinguishing the positive and negative influences that stylistic devices have on the audiences of parliament through different forms of ad hominem.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129821524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hansard and the Problem of “The Nonverbal Code” 议事录与“非语言语码”问题
Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH007
Umali Saidi
{"title":"Hansard and the Problem of “The Nonverbal Code”","authors":"Umali Saidi","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH007","url":null,"abstract":"The chapter exposes the challenges of recording proceedings in the Zimbabwean parliament using selected cases. For years, the Zimbabwean parliament has been a discursive battle ground as mostly the MDC(s) and ZANU (PF) parliamentarians have sort dominance in the August House. Some debates and submissions have generated violent confrontations, singing, jeering and dancing thereby reducing the August House into some kind of theater. Such developments are assumed to pose challenges in the recording of the nonverbal cues that carry the crux of the meanings around the debates. What has become obvious is the mere recording of the spoken submissions with very few representations of nonverbal codes usually indicated as either laughs or simply inaudible. Using selected debates from the Zimbabwean Hansard, this chapter exposes some challenges of recording parliamentary discourses especially when the nonverbal code is called into question.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127244439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信