Gender Sensitivity in Parliamentary Discourse an Appraisal Approach

Khanyile Khumalo
{"title":"Gender Sensitivity in Parliamentary Discourse an Appraisal Approach","authors":"Khanyile Khumalo","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The call for gender equality has taken the world by storm in all facets of life. This study explores four gender-themed parliamentary debates for appraisal and evaluative language. The study was prompted by the increasing importance of parliaments in today's world and the role they play in shaping decisions that affect society. The appraisal theory has been used to analyze the evaluative language that was used by parliamentarians in gender themed parliamentary debates with the aim of finding out if members of parliament conform to the dictates of these instruments or if the appraisal and evaluative resources they use render them as gender sensitive or not. The corpus of the study has been four gender-themed parliamentary debates which were taken from the national assembly Hansard of 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. The study has concluded that there are mixed views in parliament with regards to gender equality and this is reflected in the presentations by the different speakers. Some members of parliament are gender sensitive while some are still insensitive.","PeriodicalId":422145,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8094-2.CH009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The call for gender equality has taken the world by storm in all facets of life. This study explores four gender-themed parliamentary debates for appraisal and evaluative language. The study was prompted by the increasing importance of parliaments in today's world and the role they play in shaping decisions that affect society. The appraisal theory has been used to analyze the evaluative language that was used by parliamentarians in gender themed parliamentary debates with the aim of finding out if members of parliament conform to the dictates of these instruments or if the appraisal and evaluative resources they use render them as gender sensitive or not. The corpus of the study has been four gender-themed parliamentary debates which were taken from the national assembly Hansard of 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. The study has concluded that there are mixed views in parliament with regards to gender equality and this is reflected in the presentations by the different speakers. Some members of parliament are gender sensitive while some are still insensitive.
议会话语中的性别敏感:一种评价方法
性别平等的呼声席卷了世界生活的方方面面。本研究探讨了四个性别主题的议会辩论的评价和评价语言。议会在当今世界日益重要,在制定影响社会的决策方面发挥着重要作用,促使人们开展这项研究。评估理论被用来分析议员在以性别为主题的议会辩论中使用的评估语言,目的是找出议会议员是否遵守这些文书的规定,或者他们使用的评估和评估资源是否使他们对性别敏感。这项研究的语料库是四次以性别为主题的议会辩论,分别取自2013年、2014年、2015年和2016年的国民议会议事录。研究得出的结论是,议会中对性别平等的看法不一,这反映在不同发言人的发言中。有些议员对性别问题很敏感,而有些议员仍然不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信