Religion & Human Rights最新文献

Women’s Reproductive Rights and the Legacy of Religion in Ireland: The Eighth Amendment and Its Repeal 爱尔兰妇女的生殖权利和宗教遗产:第八修正案及其废除

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10021

L. Hogan

引用次数: 1

Navigating the Tensions: Women’s Rights, Religion and Freedom of Religion or Belief 在紧张局势中航行:妇女权利，宗教和宗教或信仰自由

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10019

Nazila Ghanea

{"title":"Navigating the Tensions: Women’s Rights, Religion and Freedom of Religion or Belief","authors":"Nazila Ghanea","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-bja10019","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Despite the normative integration between freedom of religion or belief (FORB) and women’s equality, these synergies are difficult to discern and there is a common misperception that women’s rights to equality and FORB are clashing rights. This is compounded by the extensive religiously phrased reservations by states upon ratification of international treaties that amplify this misperception that FORB serves to restrict women’s rights to equality. The advocacy groups supporting these rights, and also their normative sources in international human rights law instruments, are largely distinct. However, general non-discrimination provisions do address both, and General Comment no. 28 captures both rights holistically. The correctives to these misperceptions lie in reflecting upon the universality, indivisibility, interdependence, and interrelatedness of all human rights norms. They also lie in the realization that FORB is a right like any other. FORB is neither a right of “religion” as such nor an instrument for support of religiously phrased reservations and limitations on women’s rights to equality. This is particularly the case with harmful practices, as elaborated in the joint general recommendation/General Comment no. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and no. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child however, the core principles also extend to other infringements of women’s rights to equality. It is essential to (re)vitalize the synergies between FORB and women’s equality in order to advance each of these rights, to be able to address overlapping rights concerns, and to adequately acknowledge intersectional claims. Furthermore, the relevant advocacy groups and human rights mechanisms need to give further attention to this as a priority matter.","PeriodicalId":42092,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Human Rights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42458320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Human Rights, Islam, and Debates around CEDAW 人权、伊斯兰教和围绕《消除对妇女歧视公约》的辩论

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10020

Roja Fazaeli, J. Hanisek

引用次数: 1

Introduction: Women’s Religious Freedom and Freedom of Religion or Belief 引言：妇女的宗教自由与宗教或信仰自由

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10017

Roja Fazaeli, M. Yıldırım

引用次数: 0

Religious Conscience or Religious Freedom? The Difference between Official Constitutional Norms and Actual Legal Restrictions in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia 宗教良知还是宗教自由?摩洛哥、阿尔及利亚和突尼斯官方宪法规范与实际法律限制的区别

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-11-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10018

Amal Idrissi

{"title":"Religious Conscience or Religious Freedom? The Difference between Official Constitutional Norms and Actual Legal Restrictions in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia","authors":"Amal Idrissi","doi":"10.1163/18710328-bja10018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-bja10018","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This paper will consider the extent to which two competing norms—freedom of religion, on the one hand, and Islam as the religion of the state, on the other—are in tension with each other as seen through the lens of three Muslim-majority countries in the Maghreb. I examine this potential tension in four steps: first, the transformation of meaning of the Arabic word “hurriyya” (freedom) during and after the 19th century; second, the articulation of Islam as the religion of the state in the constitutions of Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia; third, the articulation of freedom of religion (whether freedom of worship or conscience) in the constitutional texts of these three countries, and finally, the question whether the laws and practices that implement these two constitutional norms are compatible or whether they in fact give priority to Islam as the state religion over the norm of freedom of religion. In Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, Islam plays an important role in the legal system, especially in family codes: the Moroccan Family Code (2004), the Algerian Family Code (2016), and the Tunisian Personal Status Code (1957). These are the remaining citadels most implicated with references to Islamic law, the interpretation of which has placed women in an unequal position.","PeriodicalId":42092,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Human Rights","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41354000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Behind the Veil: A Critical Analysis of European Veiling Laws, written by Neville Cox 《面纱背后:对欧洲面纱法的批判分析》，内维尔·考克斯著

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-01-12 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-13021150

Malthe Hilal-Harvald

引用次数: 0

Limitations to Freedom of Religion or Belief in Denmark 丹麦宗教或信仰自由的限制

IF 0.4

Religion & Human Rights Pub Date : 2020-04-23 DOI: 10.1163/18710328-bja10008

E. Lassen