Aboriginal Policy Studies最新文献

Indigenous Genocide and Reanimation, Settler Apocalypse and Hope 土著种族灭绝与复兴，定居者启示与希望

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29425

K. Tallbear

引用次数: 1

From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada 从和解到“不再无所事事”：“表达”与加拿大的土著斗争

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412

M. Robertson

{"title":"From Reconciliation to ‘Idle No More’: ‘Articulation’ and Indigenous Struggle in Canada","authors":"M. Robertson","doi":"10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i2.29412","url":null,"abstract":"How do different discourses lead to changes in understandings of the world, identity, meaning and practice in Indigenous politics in Canada? This article introduces the poststructuralist theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to Canadian Indigenous studies and demonstrates that it is a unique and effective theory for understanding this question. It finds that in the last few decades, two principal discourses regarding Indigenous peoples and colonialism have circulated in the Canadian body politic—namely, (1) “reconciliation” and (2) “Idle No More.” These discourses shape the identities of both Indigenous peoples and settlers, construct understandings of the world, and determine the meaning of related political struggle, leading to real world practice and politics. The reconciliation discourse has at times been effective at becoming a dominant discourse and has often been able to constitute the meaning of important terms such as ‘decolonization.’ It serves to pacify Indigenous resistance to colonialism. Counter-hegemonic discourses on reconciliation such as ‘Idle No More’ have been able to challenge that discourse. Academic literature, newspaper articles, YouTube videos, podcasts developed by Indigenous scholars, public letters and speeches delivered by Canadian politicians are analyzed to examine the utterances and enunciations of the two discourses.","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46296169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Book Review: Indigenous women and street gangs: Survivance narratives 书评：土著妇女和街头帮派：生存叙事

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29422

J. Koch

引用次数: 0

Editor's Introduction 编辑器的介绍

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29423

Chris Andersen

引用次数: 0

Analysis of Crime, Incarceration, Victimization and Employment of Indigenous Persons in Canada from 2015 to 2021 2015年至2021年加拿大土著居民犯罪、监禁、受害和就业分析

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29414

Jordyn Laird, Philip G. Laird

引用次数: 0

NAISA Council Statement on Indigenous Identity Fraud NAISA理事会关于土著身份欺诈的声明

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29426

Native American and Indigenous Studies Association

引用次数: 1

Remaining Unreconciled: Philanthropy and Indigenous Governance in Canada 仍未协调：加拿大的慈善事业和土著治理

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29419

Damien Lee

引用次数: 0

Indigenous Identity Fraud: An Interview with Caroline Tait 原住民身份欺诈:专访卡洛琳·泰特

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i2.29424

Robert Henry, Caroline L. Tait

引用次数: 1

Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU 确定“印度性的核心”:NIL/TU的女性主义政治经济学，O诉BCGEU

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399

Adam R. King, V. Coburn, Leah F. Vosko, Rebecca Hall, O. Lyubchenko, A. Noack

{"title":"Determining the “Core of Indianness:” A Feminist Political Economy of NIL/TU,O v. BCGEU","authors":"Adam R. King, V. Coburn, Leah F. Vosko, Rebecca Hall, O. Lyubchenko, A. Noack","doi":"10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5663/aps.v10i1.29399","url":null,"abstract":"In light of Bill C-92, which establishes a framework for delegating child and family service provision to Indigenous communities, this article addresses the contested regulation of employment and labour relations in Indigenous social service workplaces. It approaches this subject by looking back at NIL/TU,O Child and Family Services Society v. B.C. Government and Service Employees’ Union, a case in which employees at a First Nations child and family services provider attempted to unionize. NIL/TU,O set in motion a legal battle over the jurisdiction of Indigenous labour relations that ultimately reached the Supreme Court of Canada in 2010. The SCC’s determined that the labours of the Indigenous workers at NIȽ TU,O Child and Family Services are a matter of provincial jurisdiction because they fall outside of the “core of Indianness,“ a contested legal concept used to designate federal legislative power over First Nations peoples. Using Indigenous feminisms and a feminist political economy approach, we argue that this decision rests on gendered appraisals – and, indeed, obfuscations – of social reproduction labour. Bill C-92 necessitates revisiting the case history in NIL/TU,O because of the ways in which it seems to conflict with the new Act. We suggest that the uncertainty surrounding jurisdiction over Indigenous labour has the dual potential of, on the one hand, being used strategically for exploitative or dis-possessive purposes, or, on the other hand, taken up as a opening for increased self-determination by Indigenous peoples.","PeriodicalId":42043,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47854930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why Race Still Matters by Alana Lentin 《为什么种族仍然重要》，Alana Lentin著

IF 0.5

Aboriginal Policy Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI: 10.5663/aps.v10i1.29391

Leah Hrycun

引用次数: 0