American Political Thought最新文献_第3页

The Other Souls of Black Folk: George Washington Woodbey and the Spirit of Socialism 黑人的其他灵魂：乔治·华盛顿·伍德贝与社会主义精神

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725851

K. Roy

引用次数: 0

Small-Town Life and Difference 小镇生活与差异

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725852

Elly Long

引用次数: 0

:A Political Economy of Justice 《正义的政治经济学》

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725845

Brandon Davis

引用次数: 0

:Lyman Trumbull and the Second Founding of the United States :莱曼·特朗布尔和美国的第二次建国

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725849

I. Wurman

引用次数: 0

:The Death of Learning: How American Education Has Failed Our Students and What to Do about It 《学习之死:美国教育如何让我们的学生失望以及如何应对》

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725854

B. Taylor

引用次数: 1

:Cords of Affection: Constructing Constitutional Union in Early American History 情感之绳：美国早期宪政联盟的构建

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.1086/725847

Stuart A. Streichler

引用次数: 0

Harry Jaffa and the Idea That All Men Are Created Equal 哈利·雅法和“人人生而平等”的思想

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/724489

J. Dyer

{"title":"Harry Jaffa and the Idea That All Men Are Created Equal","authors":"J. Dyer","doi":"10.1086/724489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724489","url":null,"abstract":"Harry Jaffa is remembered, above all, as a morally earnest man who was alarmed by the specters of relativism, historicism, and nihilism, and who battled to defend the classical idea of natural right (see, e.g., Uhlman et al. 2015; Watson 2015; Fornieri 2016). His defense of classical natural right was anchored in the proposition, held to be self-evident by the American founders, that “all men are created equal.” This, as his interpreters have noted, creates a puzzle (Zuckert 2009). “The defining principle of classical natural right,” C. Bradley Thompson and Yaron Brook write, “is inequality” (Thompson and Brook 2010, 115). Yet Jaffa championed equality and natural right, and he considered the American regime and Abraham Lincoln’s statesmanship in the service of that regime to be quintessential models for the modern recovery of classical natural right. Jaffa’s originality, as Robert Kraynak observed, was “to claim that theDeclaration of Independence, as understood by theAmerican founders and applied by Lincoln, was the best and noblest expression of natural right in themodernworld” (2015, 169). This is the central theme ofCrisis of the House Divided, Jaffa’s magnum opus, a theme he claimed to have developed with more intricacy and complexity in ANew Birth of Freedom, a sequel toCrisis separated in their publication by four decades (Jaffa 2009, viii). Starting with this puzzle—the connection between equality and classical natural right—I briefly retrace central aspects of Jaffa’s argument, in Crisis and New Birth, about the salutary role the idea of natural equality might play in the modern","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"12 1","pages":"209 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45303855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Jaffa’s Douglas 雅法的道格拉斯

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/724495

Jeremy D. Bailey

{"title":"Jaffa’s Douglas","authors":"Jeremy D. Bailey","doi":"10.1086/724495","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724495","url":null,"abstract":"In my view, Harry V. Jaffa’sCrisis of the House Divided is the most important work of scholarship published in the field of American political thought. The greatness of the book has to do, first, with its discovery of Abraham Lincoln as a serious political thinker and, second, with its positioning Lincoln as a founder superior to the founders of 1776, including even Thomas Jefferson. The latter project required a study of the principles of Jefferson and the other founders in their own right, and Jaffa’s book includes passages that add up to perhaps the best study in that regard too. Chapters 9 and 14 are the sections I have in mind. But the greatness of Jaffa’sCrisis also lies in two other less discussed qualities of the book. One is a mastery of historical context that is rare to find in what would otherwise be a book of political theory. Jaffa likely undertook the work to master the material because he saw this not as a work of political theory or political philosophy but rather as a study of statesmanship. In order to evaluate Lincoln’s statesmanship, Jaffa believed that his reader must be able to understand Lincoln’s choices as Lincoln saw them, which is to say that Jaffa had to make an otherwise obscure history available to his reader. But in order to make this history available, Jaffa had tomaster it. Perhaps historians of the periodwill disagree, but from my vantage point in 2022, the book is a humbling reminder ofwhat intellectual history can and should be. To put it differently, Jaffa’sCrisis demonstrates that scholars working in the history of political thought can do political theory and history at the same time.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"12 1","pages":"182 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45946423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Harry, Lincoln, and Me 哈利、林肯和我

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/724493

Steven R. B. Smith

{"title":"Harry, Lincoln, and Me","authors":"Steven R. B. Smith","doi":"10.1086/724493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724493","url":null,"abstract":"to say the least. My interests had been—and to some degree still are—in the great tradition of European political philosophy, to which I condescendingly regarded the American contribution as something of an afterthought. This attitude began to change when I took Nathan Tarcov’s class on the American political founding, where we read the classic exchanges between Federalists and Anti-Federalists, as well as key documents of the revolutionary period. It was in this class where I was also introduced to Bernard Bailyn’s The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (1967), Gordon Wood’s The Creation of the American Republic (1969), and Edmund Morgan’s The Birth of the Republic (1977), which for the first time opened my eyes to the philosophic sources of the American Revolution in radical English Whig political theory. At around the same time, I read John Pocock’s magisterial, albeit flawed, TheMachiavellian Moment (1975), which sought to put the American founding period in the long history of republican self-government going back to Machiavelli and before him to Polybius and Aristotle. Suddenly what had previously seemed to me something of an intellectual backwater had become a key moment in the revival of the great tradition of classical republicanism. Shortly thereafter, I was privileged to study with David Greenstone—of blessed memory—in whose class we read Louis Hartz’s The Liberal Tradition in America (1955). Here I learned that it was the philosophy of John Locke that formed the philosophic core of American history and that helped to explain why America—at least in the height of the Cold War—seemed uniquely immune to the radical ideologies of both the Left and the Right that had been the legacy of European politics. This to me was a powerful insight and one that","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"12 1","pages":"244 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45280347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Conservatism in Crisis 危机中的保守主义

IF 0.3

American Political Thought Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/724492

Susan McWilliams Barndt

{"title":"Conservatism in Crisis","authors":"Susan McWilliams Barndt","doi":"10.1086/724492","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724492","url":null,"abstract":"Harry Jaffa was an intellectual leader of American conservatism, particularly as it developed in the second half of the twentieth century. In 2013, when Jaffa was 94 years old, theNational Review called him “the most important conservative political theorist of his generation” (Miller 2013, 34). When Jaffa died, two years later, his eulogists all echoed that judgment. Charles Kesler, for instance, told theLos Angeles Times that “Harry helped to reshape the American conservative movement” (Woo 2015, B8). Jaffa spoke about himself in similar terms; he described himself as a conservative and talked about his work in terms of building “the conservative movement” (Benson 2012, 23). Most such accounts of Jaffa’s career tie his influence on American conservatism to his reading of Abraham Lincoln, particularly in Crisis of the House Divided. Writing for the Weekly Standard, Steven Hayward (2015) puts it this way: “It is no exaggeration to say that [Jaffa] singlehandedly caused conservatives to embrace Lincoln after a long period of indifference or even hostility toward the Great Emancipator.” Joseph Fornieri writes that throughout Jaffa’s work, “Lincoln’s statesmanship figures prominently as the gold standard of measurement” for American conservatism (2016, 43). Generally speaking, I agree with these assessments. It would be hard to disagreewith them. Jaffa surely helped to shape the thinking of those calling themselves American conservatives during the second half of the twentieth century, and Jaffa’s reading of Lincoln was a core part of his teaching.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"12 1","pages":"233 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43105846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0