发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

American Political Thought最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Lincoln and the Moral Dimension of Compromise 林肯与妥协的道德维度
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/719356
G. Weiner
{"title":"Lincoln and the Moral Dimension of Compromise","authors":"G. Weiner","doi":"10.1086/719356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719356","url":null,"abstract":"Noah Feldman’s new book on Abraham Lincoln’s constitutionalism accomplishes the considerable feat of saying something new about its subject. Feldman argues that Lincoln presided over constitutional fracture, the result of which was a salutary shift from the “compromise Constitution,” which made its peace with enslavement for the sake of union, to the “moral Constitution,” which is rooted in a substantial moral aspiration. Yet compromise is more than a means of resolving disputes. Rooted in humility, compromise is itself a moral ideal. During times of ordinary politics, the compromise and moral Constitutions often converge. It is unclear whether Feldman’s Lincoln, a theorist of constitutional crisis, can guide us in situations less extreme than civil war.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43294017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robert Penn Warren and His Persistent Schism between Fact and Idea 罗伯特·潘·沃伦及其持续的事实与观念分裂
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/719263
Douglas S. Van
{"title":"Robert Penn Warren and His Persistent Schism between Fact and Idea","authors":"Douglas S. Van","doi":"10.1086/719263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719263","url":null,"abstract":"In this article I discuss the “terrible division of our age” in Robert Penn Warren’s novel All the King’s Men. I argue that a division between politics and ethics persists through the novel and through Warren’s larger body of work. This schism is meant to be fundamental to modernity, and Warren does not intend a resolution to it. I use his first book, John Brown: The Making of a Martyr, as a lens of analysis to show how his portrayal of John Brown anticipates characteristics of central characters that personify the terrible divide in his seminal publication. In doing so, I demonstrate that Warren forces our attention to an underlying logic of modernity.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45514387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patricia Sullivan. Justice Rising: Robert Kennedy’s America in Black and White. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. xxi+491. $39.95 (cloth). Patricia Sullivan。正义崛起：罗伯特·肯尼迪的《白纸黑字的美国》。马萨诸塞州剑桥：哈佛大学出版社，2021年。第xxi+491页$39.95（布）。
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/719265
R. Smith
{"title":"Patricia Sullivan. Justice Rising: Robert Kennedy’s America in Black and White. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. xxi+491. $39.95 (cloth).","authors":"R. Smith","doi":"10.1086/719265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719265","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43915025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Republican Manners, Monarchic Vigor: The Federalist Defense of Pardon Power 共和礼仪，君主活力:联邦党人对赦免权的辩护
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1086/719260
K. Burns
{"title":"Republican Manners, Monarchic Vigor: The Federalist Defense of Pardon Power","authors":"K. Burns","doi":"10.1086/719260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719260","url":null,"abstract":"The US Constitution grants the president a virtually unlimited pardon power. The Ratification Debates demonstrate that disputes between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the pardon power were based on their disagreement about separation of powers theory. Because Anti-Federalists feared that pardon power could be abused and promote monarchy, they insisted on textual restrictions (“parchment barriers”). The Federalists rejected these demands, moving beyond the Anti-Federalists’ “pure” theory of separation of powers and advocating a complex system of institutional checks and balances. This approach allowed the Federalists to show how the executive’s institutional structure not only improved the president’s use of pardon power but also helped prevent abuses. The president’s pardon power is as unlimited as the British king’s, but the Federalists insisted that it could nevertheless be safely granted to a republican magistrate because Congress could check misuse via an equally extensive power: impeachment and removal.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43482640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eric Rauchway. Why the New Deal Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2021. Pp. 232. $26.00 (cloth). Eric Rauchway。为什么新政很重要。康涅狄格州纽黑文：耶鲁大学出版社，2021年。第232页$26.00（布）。
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717945
Richard W. Coughlin
{"title":"Eric Rauchway. Why the New Deal Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2021. Pp. 232. $26.00 (cloth).","authors":"Richard W. Coughlin","doi":"10.1086/717945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717945","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43337372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adam Smith’s Unmerited Censure: Revisiting a Satirical 1764 Pamphlet on Slavery 亚当·斯密的不当谴责:重新审视1764年关于奴隶制的讽刺小册子
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717929
D. Klein, Kendra Asher
{"title":"Adam Smith’s Unmerited Censure: Revisiting a Satirical 1764 Pamphlet on Slavery","authors":"D. Klein, Kendra Asher","doi":"10.1086/717929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717929","url":null,"abstract":"We revisit the 1764 anonymous pamphlet An Essay In Vindication of the Continental Colonies of America, from A Censure of Mr Adam Smith, in his Theory of Moral Sentiments. With some Reflections on Slavery in General. The title page says “By an AMERICAN.” The pamphlet pretends to rebut Adam Smith for his supposed censure of American colonists as base wretches and the refuse of the jails of Europe. But Smith was referring to slave ship crews. The pamphlet’s true intent was to honor Smith and to promote his rebuke of the slave trade and slavery in general. The misconstrual of Smith satirizes the troubled communication between the American colonies and Britain. The final 40% of the pamphlet is an all-out condemnation of slavery. The pamphlet was recognized as such by Anthony Benezet and Thomas Clarkson. Authorship has been attributed to Arthur Lee, but we doubt it.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48720738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Opportunist: James W. Sullivan and the Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in the United States 机会主义者：詹姆斯·W·沙利文与美国倡议和全民投票的起源
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717930
R. Ellis
{"title":"The Opportunist: James W. Sullivan and the Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in the United States","authors":"R. Ellis","doi":"10.1086/717930","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717930","url":null,"abstract":"Little remembered today, James W. Sullivan wrote the book that, more than any other, catalyzed the initiative and referendum movement in the United States. Crucial to the success of Sullivan’s Direct Legislation by the Citizenship through the Initiative and Referendum was his immersion in the labor radicalism of New York City in the 1880s, including as editor of the Boycotter and Union Printer and labor editor of Henry George’s Standard. Especially important in honing and publicizing his ideas was his tenure at the radical weekly Twentieth Century between 1889 and 1892. Forged in the bitter political and ideological conflicts, setbacks, and disappointments of the late 1880s, Direct Legislation showed “the radical world” a way to sidestep doctrinal fights about political economy and focus instead on knitting together a broad “opportunistic” coalition of labor and middle-class reformers with the power to remake political institutions.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44736663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Who Decides What We Do with Our Despair? 谁决定我们用绝望做什么？
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717947
Jared A. Loggins
{"title":"Who Decides What We Do with Our Despair?","authors":"Jared A. Loggins","doi":"10.1086/717947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717947","url":null,"abstract":"This review essay considers the question of authority and authorization in contemporary black political culture in light of two recent books, Begin Again: James Baldwin’s America and Its Urgent Lessons for Our Own by Eddie S. Glaude Jr. and Afropessimism by Frank B. Wilderson III.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41670349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Louis Menand. The Free World: Art and Thought in the Cold War. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2021. Pp. 857. $35.00 (cloth). 路易斯·梅纳德。《自由世界:冷战时期的艺术与思想》纽约:Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2021。857页。35.00美元(布)。
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717948
Susan McWilliams Barndt
{"title":"Louis Menand. The Free World: Art and Thought in the Cold War. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2021. Pp. 857. $35.00 (cloth).","authors":"Susan McWilliams Barndt","doi":"10.1086/717948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717948","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43588597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brian Danoff. Why Moralize Upon It? Democratic Education through American Literature and Film. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2020. Pp. 142. $90.00 (cloth). 布莱恩·达诺夫。为什么要道德化？通过美国文学和电影进行民主教育。Lanham，医学博士：列克星敦，2020年。第142页$90.00（布）。
IF 0.3
American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1086/717946
T. W. McCarty
{"title":"Brian Danoff. Why Moralize Upon It? Democratic Education through American Literature and Film. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2020. Pp. 142. $90.00 (cloth).","authors":"T. W. McCarty","doi":"10.1086/717946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717946","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48689797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信