Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo最新文献_第10页

Warfare and group solidarity: From Ibn Khaldun to Ernest Gellner and beyond 战争与群体团结:从伊本·赫勒敦到欧内斯特·盖尔纳及其他

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2103389m

S. Malešević

引用次数: 0

Pictures, titles, personifications 图片，标题，拟人化

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2104739c

Miloš Ćipranić

引用次数: 0

The importance of Pierre Bourdieu today. On consent to misery 皮埃尔·布迪厄在今天的重要性。同意痛苦

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2104505c

Marc Crépon

{"title":"The importance of Pierre Bourdieu today. On consent to misery","authors":"Marc Crépon","doi":"10.2298/fid2104505c","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2104505c","url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on the crisis of political reason in this heyday of populistic rhetoric, proposing to move beyond the erroneous dichotomy between ?democratic reason? and ?raging passions,? and the demo-phobia that often derives from it. We propose instead to follow Bourdieu?s footsteps in bringing our attention to the forms of impermeability that fracture our contemporary political and social life, establishing the conditions of possibility of the reasonable and the unreasonable. What marks contemporary political passions as particularly dangerous is their impermeability to the lessons of our historical past, to the moral condemnation of the political instrumentalization of difference and to the sacred character of fundamental principles. This hermeneutical gap, however, is later explained by a more fundamental analysis of the problem of contemporary impermeability, one which operates as a reversal of the dichotomy between political reason and passion. It is no longer the electorate, seduced by the sirens of populism, which is impermeable to the voice of political reason; it is, instead, this very reason, embodied by the elites who claim to recognize themselves in its values and principles, which has become impermeable to the ?conditions of non-existence? in which a considerable part of the population lives. If there is a problem of contemporary impermeability, or imperturbability, it is that of a political discourse that has lost touch with ?all the misery of the world?.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84911604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Now is the “We-Time.” Heidegger’s ‘Black Notebooks’ read as self-critical reflection of Nazi involvement 现在是“我们的时代”。海德格尔的《黑色笔记》被解读为对纳粹参与的自我批判

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2104729j

Rastko Jovanov

引用次数: 0

Can it be or feel right to hate? On the appropriateness and fittingness of hatred 恨是对的吗?论仇恨的适当性和适宜性

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2103341s

Thomas Szanto

{"title":"Can it be or feel right to hate? On the appropriateness and fittingness of hatred","authors":"Thomas Szanto","doi":"10.2298/fid2103341s","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2103341s","url":null,"abstract":"What exactly is wrong with hating others? However deep-seated the intuition, when it comes to spelling out the reasons for why hatred is inappropriate, the literature is rather meager and confusing. In this paper, I attempt to be more precise by distinguishing two senses in which hatred is inappropriate, a moral and a non-moral one. First, I critically discuss the central current proposals defending the possibility of morally appropriate hatred in the face of serious wrongs or evil perpetrators and show that they are all based on a problematic assumption, which I call the ?reality of evil agents assumption?. I then turn to the issue of non-moral emotional appropriateness and sketch a novel, focus-based account of fittingness. Next, I outline the distinctive affective intentionality of hatred, suggesting that hatred, unlike most other antagonistic emotions, has an overgeneralizing and indeterminate affective focus. Against this background, I argue that hatred cannot be fitting. Due to the indeterminacy of its focus, hatred fails to pick out those evaluative features of the intentional object that would really matter to the emoters. I close with some tentative remarks on the possibility of appropriate hatred towards corporate or group agents.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86861159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A critical account of the concept of de-objectified hatred 对去客观化的仇恨概念的批判性描述

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2103369l

Mark Losoncz

引用次数: 0

The messiness of victory and heroism: A brief response to Carl Schmitt 胜利和英雄主义的混乱:对卡尔·施密特的简短回应

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2104662b

P. Bojanić, Edward Djordjevic

引用次数: 0

On murderous silence 关于致命的沉默

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/FID2101067C

Marc Crépon

引用次数: 0

Relationship between moral responsibility for zoonotic pandemics outbreaks and industrial animal farms 人畜共患病大流行爆发的道德责任与工业化动物养殖场的关系

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/fid2104695g

Josip Guć

{"title":"Relationship between moral responsibility for zoonotic pandemics outbreaks and industrial animal farms","authors":"Josip Guć","doi":"10.2298/fid2104695g","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2104695g","url":null,"abstract":"The responsibility for the COVID-19 pandemic was first ascribed to persons associated with the Huanan Seafood Market. However, many scientists suggest that this pandemic is actually a consequence of human intrusion into nature. This opens up a whole new perspective for an examination of direct and indirect, individual and collective responsibility concerning this particular pandemic, but also zoonotic pandemics as such. In this context, one of the key issues are the consequences of factory-farming of animals, which contributes to circumstances in which zoonotic pandemics emerge. Moreover, it is part of a larger economic system, global capitalism, whose logic implies certain coercion toward its participants to keep it essentially unchanged and therefore to make sure that livestock health remains ?the weakest link in our global health chain? (FAO). However, even though the precise answer to the issue of moral responsibility for zoonotic pandemics outbreaks in general and the COVID-19 pandemic in particular cannot be given, it is possible to list certain indicators and make a framework helpful in ascribing moral responsibility to certain persons. The paper intends to do so by examining the notion of responsibility and by applying it to the issues mentioned. The results of this analysis show that it is misleading to place moral blame on people involved in actions that directly caused the animal-to-human transmission of a certain virus or on humanity as a whole.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82871455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Arguing for classical critical theory 为古典批判理论辩护

IF 0.1

Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2298/FID2101005R

M. Rasmussen

引用次数: 0