Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy最新文献

{"title":"The elusive influence of the Advocate General on the Court of Justice","authors":"U. Šadl, Suvi Sankari","doi":"10.1093/yel/yex001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yex001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90689149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Regulating criminal finance in the EU in the light of the international instruments","authors":"L. Borlini","doi":"10.1093/yel/yew030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yew030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"71 1","pages":"553-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77752863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Designing a Multilateral Investment Court: Issues and Options","authors":"R. Howse","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEX013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"115 1","pages":"209-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90236195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Court of Justice as an inter-state court","authors":"G. Butler","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEX014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX014","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"99 1","pages":"179-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77312004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Activist Infighting among Courts and Breakdown of Mutual Trust? The Danish Supreme Court, the CJEU, and the Ajos Case","authors":"Ulla B. Neergaard, K. Sørensen","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEX008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX008","url":null,"abstract":"In its combative Ajos judgement recently rendered by the Danish Supreme Court, the court openly and controversially challenged the authority of the CJEU. By the same token, in the preliminary ruling by the CJEU preceding it, the CJEU had continued to develop the controversial general principle prohibiting age discrimination. This issue lay at the heart of the dispute and it seems very likely that the Danish Supreme Court felt that the CJEU had been too activist when it originally ‘launched’ this general principle. Indeed, the reasoning of the Danish Supreme Court gives the impression that the CJEU had itself created it out of nowhere. In turn this appeared to be an implicit reference to the widely criticised interpretative approach of the CJEU, resulting in a far-reaching willingness to espouse judicial activism. But in acting as it did, it seems ironic that the Danish Supreme Court itself showed that it too had an activist streak. Thus, both Courts were quite imaginative in trying to mould the central issues as falling within their exclusive jurisdiction. As a consequence of the judgments, parts of EU law are not, it appears, fully part of Danish law, but unfortunately the full implications and therefore the remedy are far from certain. While both judgments appear to reflect a lack of mutual trust between the two courts, they also expose a range of highly significant issues of wide importance. To understand both what went wrong in the judicial dialogue and the wider issues at stake, in this article the judgments are analysed in depth and placed into their wider context. Among other matters, we have considered how the courts should strike the sensitive balance, which has to exist in the relationship between the national courts and the CJEU, requiring mutual trust or, at the least, judicial comity in accordance with the hierarchy of norms established by virtue of EU law. Also, we discuss how if that degree of cooperation were to break down, as has happened in Ajos as a result of the Supreme Court’s failure to follow the preliminary ruling of the CJEU uniformity of application of EU law could be jeopardized.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"275-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87456179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The UK Supreme Court and References to the CJEU","authors":"Anthony Arnull","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEX006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEX006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"36 1","pages":"314-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74417252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eppur Si Muove! The Past, Present, and (possible) Future of Temporal Limitations in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure","authors":"D. Düsterhaus","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEW026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEW026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"7 1","pages":"237-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83794207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Quest for a (Fully-Fletched) Theoretical Framework: Co-implication, Embeddedness and Interdependency between Public International Law and EU Law","authors":"Violeta Moreno-Lax, Paul Gragl","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEW016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEW016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"120 1","pages":"455-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87867341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction Notice Exercise of EU Competences and Pre-emption of Member States’ Powers in the Internal and the External Sphere: Towards ‘Grand Unification’?","authors":"Amedeo Arena","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEW029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEW029","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74613307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Challenges of EU Enforcement and Elements of Criminal Law Theory: On Sanctions and Value in Contemporary ‘Freedom, Security and Justice’ Law","authors":"E. Herlin-Karnell","doi":"10.1093/YEL/YEW005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/YEL/YEW005","url":null,"abstract":"This paper challenges established visions of EU legal enforcement by testing them in the context of criminal law theory and asks to what extent EU law can be enforced against non-compliant Member States via the use of criminal law. A main theme running through this article is the basic question as to what extent the EU legislator needs criminal law provisions for the enforcement of EU law. The paper does this by looking at the effect of administrative sanctions and their link to criminal law sanctions. In addition, the paper assesses the wider theoretical implications for the enforcement of EU law through criminal law and specifically when the values of the EU and those of the Member States are in conflict. Critically, the paper asks if the EU enforcement toolkit is sufficiently nuanced when applied in a criminal law context and sets out to chart the genesis of EU law enforcement through the use of criminal law theory. This seems particularly relevant to the discussion of enforcement in general, given that the operation of EU law essentially and chiefly concerns the values to be enforced in the national arena.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"134 1","pages":"291-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79470063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}