Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy最新文献_第10页

The Micro Level: Insights from Specific Policy AreasForging Links between Legal Orders 微观层面:从具体政策领域看法律秩序之间的联系

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW025

E. Denza

引用次数: 0

Constitutionalism, Resistance, and Openness: Comparative Law Reflections on Constitutionalism in Postnational Governance 宪政、反抗与开放:后国家治理中宪政的比较法思考

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW006

Giuseppe Martinico

引用次数: 2

The Meso Level: Means of Interaction between EU and International Law: Flipping the Question: The Reception of EU Law in the International Legal Order 中观层面:欧盟与国际法的互动方式;翻转问题:欧盟法在国际法律秩序中的接受

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW019

R. Wessel

引用次数: 3

Community Trade Mark Regulation: A Commentary by Gordian N. Hasselblatt (ed) 共同体商标监管:Gordian N. Hasselblatt评论(编)

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW012

Stavroula Karapapa

引用次数: 0

The Micro Level: Insights from Specific Policy AreasThe Relationship between EU Law and International Law in the Field of Human Rights 微观层面:从具体政策领域看欧盟法与国际法在人权领域的关系

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/yel/yew023

C. Tomuschat

引用次数: 3

Coherence in EU Competition Law by Wolf Sauter 《欧盟竞争法的一致性》，沃尔夫·索特著

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW010

Despoina Mantzari

引用次数: 0

The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument—Five Years Old and Growing by Sybe de Vries, Ulf Bernitz and Stephen Weatherill 《作为约束性文书的欧盟基本权利宪章——五年之久并在不断发展》，作者:Sybe de Vries、Ulf Bernitz和Stephen Weatherill

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW008

Tobias Lock

引用次数: 7

The Past, Present and Future of the Relation between the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights 欧洲法院和欧洲人权法院之间关系的过去、现在和未来

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW002

F. Fabbrini, J. Larik

引用次数: 5

The Meso Level: Means of Interaction between EU and International Law: Customary International Law as a Source of EU Law: A Two-Way Fertilization Route? 中观层面:欧盟与国际法的互动方式:习惯国际法作为欧盟法的渊源:双向的促进途径?

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/YEL/YEW020

T. Konstadinides

引用次数: 4

Tax Barriers to Intra-Union Trade: American ‘Federalism’, European ‘Internationalism’? 欧盟内部贸易的税收壁垒:美国的“联邦制”，欧洲的“国际主义”?

IF 0.4

Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/yel/yew013

R. Schütze

{"title":"Tax Barriers to Intra-Union Trade: American ‘Federalism’, European ‘Internationalism’?","authors":"R. Schütze","doi":"10.1093/yel/yew013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yew013","url":null,"abstract":"The task of creating a ‘common’ market is one of the central tasks of many unions. When the Philadelphia Convention drafted the 1787 US Constitution, there was little argument that the new Union had to become an economic union.1 And the objective to create a common market lay equally at the heart of the original European Union. The 1957 Rome Treaty was to establish a European Economic Community, whose central aim was the creation of a European ‘common market’.2 This market was primarily a common market in goods, but the Rome Treaty was equally committed to ‘the abolition, as between Member States, of obstacles to freedom of movement for persons, services and capital’.3 In order to create a common market in goods, the European Treaties thereby made a fundamental distinction between regulatory barriers and fiscal barriers to intra-state trade. While the former were to be negatively removed by Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),4 fiscal barriers were subject to a different constitutional regime. And a closer look back at the US constitutional order also reveals that the Supreme Court, too, has ‘long subjected taxation to other limits and has long treated taxation differently from other kinds of regulation’.5 This differential treatment here partly stemmed—as in the case of the European Union—from the text of the US Constitution itself; yet, even for provisions that equally captured regulatory as well as fiscal charges, a fiscal ‘exceptionalism’ soon developed.","PeriodicalId":41752,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law & Policy","volume":"12 1","pages":"382-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74588470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0