Scientia et Fides最新文献_第6页

Political Theology as Theodicy: The Holy Spirit’s Performance in the Economy of Redemption 作为神正论的政治神学:圣灵在救赎经济中的表现

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.025

Martina Grassi

{"title":"Political Theology as Theodicy: The Holy Spirit’s Performance in the Economy of Redemption","authors":"Martina Grassi","doi":"10.12775/setf.2021.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2021.025","url":null,"abstract":"Although Political Theology examined mainly the political dimension of the relationship between God-Father and God-Son, it is paramount to consider the political performance of the Holy Spirit in the Economy of Redemption. The Holy Spirit has been characterized as the binding cause and the principle of relationality both referring to God’s inner life and to God’s relationship with His creatures. As the personalization of relationality, the Holy Spirit performs a unique task: to bring together what is apart by means of organisation. This power of the Spirit to turn a plurality into a unity is manifested in the Latin translation of oikonomía as disposition, that is, giving a special order to the multiple elements within a certain totality. Within this activity of the Spirit, Theodicy can be regarded as the way to depict God’s arrangement of the world and of history, bringing everything together towards the eschatological Kingdom of God. The paper aims at showing this fundamental activity of the Holy Spirit in Christian Theology, and intends to pose the question on how to think on a theology beyond theodicy, that is, how to think on a Trinitarian God beyond the categories of sovereignty and totalization.","PeriodicalId":41706,"journal":{"name":"Scientia et Fides","volume":"178 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89032970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Special Issue of Scientia et Fides on Experimental Psychology and the Notion of Personhood 《科学与信仰》关于实验心理学和人格概念的特刊

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.015

J. F. Franck, Scott Harrower, Ryan S. Peterson

引用次数: 0

La acción humana: una propuesta integral para el diálogo interdisciplinar sobre la personalidad 人类行动:关于人格的跨学科对话的综合建议

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.022

José Víctor Orón Semper, Miriam Martinez Martínez Mares

{"title":"La acción humana: una propuesta integral para el diálogo interdisciplinar sobre la personalidad","authors":"José Víctor Orón Semper, Miriam Martinez Martínez Mares","doi":"10.12775/setf.2021.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2021.022","url":null,"abstract":"La necesidad de categorizar la personalidad es recurrente en estudios filosóficos, teológicos y, especialmente, psicológicos. No obstante, la falta de diálogo entre las distintas disciplinas da lugar a diversos análisis que parecen dividir la realidad humana en “parcelas” que, a menudo, son incompatibles entre sí; ¿cómo hablar, por ejemplo, de libertad antropológica desde las numerosas aportaciones conductistas de la psicología? Atendiendo a este problema, el presente artículo propone el análisis integral de la acción humana (el modo en el que la persona se actualiza) como una perspectiva que da lugar a una parametrización psicológica ajustada a la complejidad de la personalidad. Partiendo de la visión integral de la acción, su aspecto comportamental y mental comúnmente estudiados se advierten como insuficientes y se amplía el horizonte al elemento de la interioridad. Este modo más completo de parametrizar a la persona atiende su complejidad y apunta, simultáneamente, a lo que no es conceptualizable en ella. Traer al escenario la interioridad supondrá una lectura renovada de la psicología, la filosofía y la teología, así como su evidente necesidad de interacción.","PeriodicalId":41706,"journal":{"name":"Scientia et Fides","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73962697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Second-person Perspective in Interdisciplinary Research: A Cognitive Approach for Understanding and Improving the Dynamics of Collaborative Research Teams 跨学科研究中的第二人称视角:一种理解和改善合作研究团队动态的认知方法

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.023

C. Vanney, J. I. Aguinalde Sáenz

引用次数: 3

¿La comunicabilidad operativa de la persona requiere su comunicabilidad ontológica? Discusión sobre un dogma filosófico de nuestro tiempo 人的操作交际性是否需要本体论交际性?讨论我们这个时代的哲学教条

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.019

Juan Pablo Roldán

引用次数: 0

Do we Need a Plant Theodicy? 我们需要植物神正论吗?

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.026

L. Strickland

引用次数: 1

The concepts of virtue after the „character – situation” debate “人-情”之争后的德性概念

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.018

Natasza Szutta

{"title":"The concepts of virtue after the „character – situation” debate","authors":"Natasza Szutta","doi":"10.12775/setf.2021.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2021.018","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on a currently hot debate in contemporary ethics that takes place between so-called situationists and the advocates of virtue ethics. The fundamental assumption made by virtue ethics is that developing and perfecting one’s moral character or moral virtues warrants one’s morally good action. Situationists claim that this assumption contradicts the results of the latest empirical studies. From this observation, they conclude that virtue ethics is based on an empirically inadequate moral psychology.In the first part of the article, I present the conceptions of virtue and moral character developed in response to the situationist criticism. I show to which degree these conceptions differ from the classical, so-called global approach in virtue ethics In the second part, based on the references to the latest empirical studies in social and cognitive psychology, I argue, against the situationist objection, that the classical notion of virtue meets the requirement of empirical adequacy. I mainly resort to the interactionist theory of personality by W. Mischel, R. Baumeister’s studies over self-control, D. Kahneman's conception of two-processual mind, and the studies over automatized processes by J. Bargh.","PeriodicalId":41706,"journal":{"name":"Scientia et Fides","volume":"209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77750776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Dialogical Self Analogy for the Godhead: Recasting the “God is a Person” Debate 神性的对话性自我类比:重铸“神是位格”辩论

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.020

Scott Harrower

{"title":"The Dialogical Self Analogy for the Godhead: Recasting the “God is a Person” Debate","authors":"Scott Harrower","doi":"10.12775/setf.2021.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12775/setf.2021.020","url":null,"abstract":"May God may be understood and referred to as a “person”? This is a live debate in contemporary theological and philosophical circles. However, despite the attention this debate has received, the vital question of how to account for God’s trinitarian nature has been mostly overlooked. Due to trinitarian concerns about the unqualified use of “person” as an analogy for the Godhead, I intervene in this debate with a two-fold proposal. The first is that proponents of using a person as an analogy for the Godhead will be better served by using a psychologically informed analogy of a “self” instead. In particular, the Dialogical Self model of a person holds much promise. In what follows, I argue that the “Dialogical Self Analogy” for the Godhead is more likely to uphold God’s trinitarian nature, avoid trinitarian confusion and related problems than “person” analogies do. The primary benefit of speaking of God as a Dialogical Self is that it offers a psychologically modelled analogy for God, whilst avoiding the language of person, yet strongly taking into account God’s trinitarian nature. This has the important benefit of preserving the concept and language of “person” for the trinitarian persons (the prosopa/hypostases), and hence avoiding the linguistic, conceptual and ecumenical confusion that arises when referring to the Godhead as a person. The strength of using the model and language of a Dialogical Self as an analogy for the Godhead (instead of person) is demonstrated by showing its compatibility with Erickson’s criteria for describing the Trinity.","PeriodicalId":41706,"journal":{"name":"Scientia et Fides","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79222236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Divine Universal Causality and the Particular Problem of Hell: A Quiescence Solution 神圣的普遍因果关系和地狱的特殊问题:一个安静的解决方案

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.024

Adam Wood

引用次数: 0

Incapaces de Dios 没有神的能力

IF 1

Scientia et Fides Pub Date : 2021-08-29 DOI: 10.12775/SETF.2021.027

E. M. Claramunt

引用次数: 0