发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Reflections on 'A Tax System for New Zealand's Future' 对“新西兰未来税收制度”的思考
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.04
J. Creedy
{"title":"Reflections on 'A Tax System for New Zealand's Future'","authors":"J. Creedy","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.04","url":null,"abstract":"'A Tax System for New Zealand's Future', the Report of the Tax Working Group, is reviewed. The Report is judged a model of rational policy analysis, explaining the need for reform, the basic principles used to consider alternative policies, and the advantages and disadvantages of a range of reform proposals. A number of aspects concerning the evaluation of tax structures are considered, and some arguments which not stated explicitly in the Report are clarified.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"84 1","pages":"63-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83462796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Beauty ≠ Truth?: Thoughts on Krugman's 'How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?' 美≠真?:对克鲁格曼的《经济学家是如何错得如此离谱的?》
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.10
J. Quiggin
{"title":"Beauty ≠ Truth?: Thoughts on Krugman's 'How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?'","authors":"J. Quiggin","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.10","url":null,"abstract":"Some of the different views and opinions regarding Paul Krugman's 'How did economists get it so wrong?' are discussed. The changes that need to be incorporated into the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models to ensure better predictive capacity are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"360 1","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76333003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Beyond Krugman to Behavioural Keynes 从克鲁格曼到行为凯恩斯
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07
Ian M. McDonald
{"title":"Beyond Krugman to Behavioural Keynes","authors":"Ian M. McDonald","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.07","url":null,"abstract":"John Cochrane appears to concede that Paul Krugman's critique does have some important pillars to be paid attention to. Krugman views Keynesian economics as the best framework for macroeconomics that advocates that it is inadequate aggregate demand that drives recessions, not confusion about relative prices, nor lapses in technical progress, nor voluntary shifts to leisure during times of low real wages.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":" 6","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72381598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
What Keynes Missed and Krugman Is Missing: The Short/Long Choice 凯恩斯和克鲁格曼错过了什么:做空/做多的选择
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09
D. Vines
{"title":"What Keynes Missed and Krugman Is Missing: The Short/Long Choice","authors":"D. Vines","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09","url":null,"abstract":"The review and analysis of Paul Krugman's question 'How did economists get it so wrong?' is discussed and it is seen that Krugman's answer is actually too optimistic, and that things are worse than he suggests. Krugman's suggestion that the Keynesian framework is the best option also appears to be debatable as something appears to be lacking in Keynesian economics.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"9 1","pages":"101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75873039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fairness in Public-utility Regulation: A Theory 公用事业监管中的公平:一个理论
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-07-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.01
D. Biggar
{"title":"Fairness in Public-utility Regulation: A Theory","authors":"D. Biggar","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.01","url":null,"abstract":"Regulators routinely and systematically depart from policy prescriptions that are soundly based in conventional economic theory. In doing so, they often appeal to notions of fairness, justice, or reasonableness. Economists have historically struggled with these notions, which seem to be separate from, or in conflict with, conventional economic efficiency. This paper identifies five stylised facts about public attitudes to fairness in utility pricing, and argues that these stylised facts can be explained as an implicit attempt to protect the sunk investments of consumers in a natural monopoly's services. Thus the paper suggests that the notion of fairness is not in conflict with the conventional notion of economic efficiency, but can be seen as consistent with the desire to promote sunk investment by the monopolist and its customers.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"117 1","pages":"5-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79502447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Krugman on the Malaise of Modern Macro: Critique without Alternative 克鲁格曼论现代宏观的弊病:没有选择的批判
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08
Keith Rankin
{"title":"Krugman on the Malaise of Modern Macro: Critique without Alternative","authors":"Keith Rankin","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08","url":null,"abstract":"The views of Paul Krugman on modern macro in terms of the global financial crisis representing a collective failure of an economics profession which had become complacent, believing that financial markets could not, in themselves, cause non-trivial recessions is discussed. Krugman is right to question the capability of economics developed under the auspices of the dominant neoclassical paradigm to predict business cycle events; however, a more constructive critique is required.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"15 1","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90919879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
An Excess of Access: An Examination of Part IIIA of the Australian Trade Practices Act 超限准入:对《澳大利亚贸易行为法》第IIIA部分的考察
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2009-12-22 DOI: 10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.03
H. Ergas
{"title":"An Excess of Access: An Examination of Part IIIA of the Australian Trade Practices Act","authors":"H. Ergas","doi":"10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.03","url":null,"abstract":"Part IIIA of the Australian Trade Practices Act defines circumstances in which a facility owner may be required to provide a third party with use of its facility. This paper examines what Part IIIA might be doing from an economic perspective and criticises ‘monopoly leveraging’ arguments for third-party access. It argues that the transactions costs of access are potentially significant, and can exceed any efficiency gains third-party access permits. These contentions are corroborated by reference to the long-running dispute between the Fortescue Metals Group and BHP Billiton Iron Ore over access to rail track in the Pilbara region of Western Australia.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"22 1","pages":"37-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2009-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81800439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The 'Excellence in Research for Australia' Scheme: A Test Drive of Draft Journal Weights with New Zealand Data “澳大利亚卓越研究”计划:用新西兰数据对期刊权重草案进行测试
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2009-12-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.01
David L. Anderson, John D. Tressler
{"title":"The 'Excellence in Research for Australia' Scheme: A Test Drive of Draft Journal Weights with New Zealand Data","authors":"David L. Anderson, John D. Tressler","doi":"10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.01","url":null,"abstract":"The paper assesses the draft weighting system used by the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) scheme for measuring the output of refereed economics journal articles. It does so by using data from New Zealand's economics departments to demonstrate how the rankings of departmental and individual researchers are affected by the use of ERA weights rather than alternative weights employed in the economics literature. It concludes that the draft version of the ERA scheme, as released in August 2008, rewards research quantity over research quality, as traditionally defined.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"53 1","pages":"7-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85308328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Fiscal 'Stimulus': A Loanable Funds Critique 财政“刺激”:可贷资金批判
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2009-12-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.02
A. Makin
{"title":"Fiscal 'Stimulus': A Loanable Funds Critique","authors":"A. Makin","doi":"10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.02","url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes an extended loanable-funds framework for examining the effects of fiscal stimulus on the budget balance, international borrowing, real interest rates, private saving, private investment and national income. It challenges the prevailing view that fiscal policy can be used effectively as an income 'stimulus' instrument, and proposes that discretionary fiscal measures that increase the budget deficit entail macroeconomic costs for significant external borrower economies, such as Australia, New Zealand and the United States.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"40 1","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77447909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
The book cannot stand on its own as an accurate portrait 这本书本身并不能作为一幅准确的肖像
IF 0.1
Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform Pub Date : 2009-12-01 DOI: 10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.05
P. Groenewegen
{"title":"The book cannot stand on its own as an accurate portrait","authors":"P. Groenewegen","doi":"10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.16.04.2009.05","url":null,"abstract":"A brief review of the book 'Political Economy Now', about which it is opined that this study of the Political Economy dispute book cannot stand on its own, is presented. It is mentioned that the book presents an uneven account of the subject matter, and needs a more critical approach to the evidence.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"16 1","pages":"83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81401238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信