{"title":"凯恩斯和克鲁格曼错过了什么:做空/做多的选择","authors":"D. Vines","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review and analysis of Paul Krugman's question 'How did economists get it so wrong?' is discussed and it is seen that Krugman's answer is actually too optimistic, and that things are worse than he suggests. Krugman's suggestion that the Keynesian framework is the best option also appears to be debatable as something appears to be lacking in Keynesian economics.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"9 1","pages":"101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Keynes Missed and Krugman Is Missing: The Short/Long Choice\",\"authors\":\"D. Vines\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The review and analysis of Paul Krugman's question 'How did economists get it so wrong?' is discussed and it is seen that Krugman's answer is actually too optimistic, and that things are worse than he suggests. Krugman's suggestion that the Keynesian framework is the best option also appears to be debatable as something appears to be lacking in Keynesian economics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"101-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Keynes Missed and Krugman Is Missing: The Short/Long Choice
The review and analysis of Paul Krugman's question 'How did economists get it so wrong?' is discussed and it is seen that Krugman's answer is actually too optimistic, and that things are worse than he suggests. Krugman's suggestion that the Keynesian framework is the best option also appears to be debatable as something appears to be lacking in Keynesian economics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
