ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law最新文献_第10页

Expropriation of Adolf Hitler’s Birthplace: Justified under the Special Historic Responsibility of Austria 阿道夫·希特勒出生地的征用:奥地利特殊历史责任下的正当性

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0099

Tamara Schöndorfer

引用次数: 0

A Re-examination of the Family Reunification Directive in the post-Lisbon Fundamental Rights Scene 《家庭团聚指令》在《里斯本条约》后基本权利框架下的重新审视

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0083

G. Milios

引用次数: 1

European Consensus: A Conservative and a Dynamic Force in European Human Rights Jurisprudence 欧洲共识:欧洲人权法学的保守与动力

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0091

Eszter Polgári

{"title":"European Consensus: A Conservative and a Dynamic Force in European Human Rights Jurisprudence","authors":"Eszter Polgári","doi":"10.1515/icl-2017-0091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2017-0091","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The European Court of Human Rights needs to find a balance between upholding diversity (and respecting sovereignty through the margin of appreciation doctrine) on the one hand, and the aspiration to set universal human rights standards, on the other. Responses to these opposing forces are reflected in various doctrines and methods of interpretation, judicial choices that often predetermine the outcome of a case. Through examples taken from the LGBT rights jurisprudence, the article explores how the competing notions of European consensus (a conservative one and a dynamic one) relate to other techniques of interpretation, and how they influence the decision-making of the Court. The article explains that the Court applies the notion of consensus in an arbitrary manner. While the conservative modalities of the consensus argument appear to constrain the Court and allow considerable leeway for domestic authorities, the dynamic notions facilitate the development of European human rights standards, even if it may not be evidenced convincingly by the practices of the member states. The article argues that in its current state, without a foreseeable and disciplined methodology, the consensus inquiry is not capable of building a bridge between the margin of appreciation and the dynamic interpretation.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82110519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Constitutional Jurisdiction in a Democracy Governed by the Rule of Law 法治民主制度下的宪法管辖权

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2018-0001

Gerhart Holzinger

引用次数: 1

Interdependency between Sovereignty, Citizenship and the Right to Vote 主权、公民权和选举权之间的相互依存关系

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2018-04-25 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0086

M. Suksi

引用次数: 0

The Constitutional Court and Others in Romanian Constitutionalism – 25 Years After 罗马尼亚宪法法院和其他机构——25年后

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0074

Bianca Selejan-Gut̗an

引用次数: 1

Social Rights Protection in Europe in Times of Crisis: ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ 危机时期欧洲的社会权利保护:“双城记”

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0071

A. Baraggia, Maria Elena Gennusa

{"title":"Social Rights Protection in Europe in Times of Crisis: ‘A Tale of Two Cities’","authors":"A. Baraggia, Maria Elena Gennusa","doi":"10.1515/icl-2017-0071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2017-0071","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Europe can be considered a sort of fortress of the protection of socio-economic rights. However, this bright scenario has been unsettled by the eruption of the Eurozone crisis, which has challenged the narrative of social Europe and swept away protections for social rights in Member States grappling with sovereign debt crises such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus, Latvia and Romania. In these countries, austerity measures led to persistent violations of social rights, under the external constraint of conditionality regimes which involved cuts in wages, pensions and welfare services. Consequently, austerity measures were challenged in domestic and European Courts and before the ECSR. In other words, there has been a ‘turn to the law’, in order to give concrete effect to the potential offered by the relevant legal instruments. What has been the general attitude of the Courts and quasi-judicial bodies to actions challenging austerity measures? Since the analysis of how the Courts and other human rights bodies manage the complex and controversial balance between austerity and social rights is an excellent ‘stress test’ to determine the ‘weight’ of the latter not only in the political debate, but also in the human rights discourse, this paper will focus on the ‘crisis cases’ in Europe, so as to shed light on the actual level of protection for social rights.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88014232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

What’s in a Name? Equal Treatment, Union Citizens and National Rules on Names and Titles 名字里有什么?关于姓名和头衔的平等待遇、联邦公民和国家规则

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI: 10.1515/ICL-2017-0075

Á. Mohay, N. Tóth

引用次数: 0

The Hong Kong Occupy Injunction Cases 香港占中禁令案

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2017-12-20 DOI: 10.1515/ICL-2017-0072

F. Lone

{"title":"The Hong Kong Occupy Injunction Cases","authors":"F. Lone","doi":"10.1515/ICL-2017-0072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ICL-2017-0072","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In September 2014, the deadlock over election reforms in Hong Kong sparked off a mass civil disobedience occupy movement. This political dispute eventually reached the legal arena after the filing of injunction applications before the courts of Hong Kong to clear the protest sites. This article aims to discuss the courts’ approach towards the adjudication of these injunction cases. In particular, this article will review: (a) the appropriateness of the scope of the interim injunctions granted to protect the plaintiff’s personal rights under the tort of public nuisance; (b) the function of the police in implementing the injunction orders; (c) the position the courts should adopt in defending individual rights of the plaintiffs if a similar remedy is already available under the statute; and (d) the way courts should reconcile competing claims and protect both the unidentified protestors’ human rights and the private rights of the plaintiffs. The article maintains that the injunction cases have set rather dangerous precedents regarding the protection of fundamental rights in Hong Kong in cases of public order involving protection of private rights. The same analysis leads to the conclusion that in a democratic society, the courts have a duty to find the balance between the protection of fundamental human rights and private rights under tort of nuisance, while also observing significant procedural rules.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89239270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

International Constitutional Law – Inclusive, but Still Selective? 国际宪法——包容，但仍有选择性?

IF 0.2

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2017-10-26 DOI: 10.1515/icl-2017-0020

Judith Köbler

{"title":"International Constitutional Law – Inclusive, but Still Selective?","authors":"Judith Köbler","doi":"10.1515/icl-2017-0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2017-0020","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Developing international constitutional law, apart from difficulties concerning its definition, faces certain well-known problems – ranging from its pluralistic mode of creation to its enforceability, but has also to scrutinise its aims. If its aim is to at least provide a global reference framework for constitutional principles and concepts – since serving as a common set of values does reach its own limits rather quickly eg concerning fundamental issues such as the role of women in society or sustainability – it has to be inclusive in nature. Certain areas of international law, such as human rights – via Universal Periodic Review or treaty monitoring bodies such as CAT – or WTO law interact closely with national constitutional and/or regional international law (ECHR) and or regional constitutional/public law (eg EU Law). Therefore, their ideas may be taken up – voluntarily through courts or academia, due to examination mechanisms through governments or tribunals – be modified (if necessary to fit into a national constitutional system or supranational constitutional framework) and transported back into the global community (eg as feedback within a WTO case or an UPR). This, however, is event driven. Therefore, it cannot be a carefully conceptualised coherent law such as national constitutions. National (and land constitutions, which may also provide important ideals) constitutions in general serve several functions: as set of values eg in the area of fundamental rights, for structuring the state functions by setting up institutions and modes of operation, and as reference for the interpretation of norms eg in court cases. Their overall purpose is to provide a coherent inner regime. Nevertheless, by promoting certain selected ‘institutionalisable’ constitutional ideas (for example through the rule of law initiative) we can aim to strive from a fragmented towards a more coherent global framework.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85576742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0