Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research最新文献_第6页

Selfhood and the Problem of Sameness: Some Reflections 自我与相似性问题：几点思考

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00284-8

K. Pathak

引用次数: 0

Value Education: Eastern and Western Human Value and Virtues 价值教育:东西方人的价值与美德

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00281-x

L. Patra

引用次数: 0

Professional Ethics: An Upaniṣadic Perspective 职业道德：一个乌帕尼ṣadic透视

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00280-y

Surya Kanta Maharana

引用次数: 0

Moderate Realism and Deduction from Truthlike Theories 适度的现实主义与真实理论的演绎

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00276-8

Kit Patrick

引用次数: 0

The Materiality of the Sign in Khasi Oral Tradition: Derrida’s Linguistic Materialism 卡西人口头传统中符号的物质性:德里达的语言唯物主义

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00279-5

Shining Star Lyngdoh

引用次数: 0

Historiography of Indian Philosophy: Reflections on Periodization and Conceptualization 印度哲学史学:关于分期与概念化的思考

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-06 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00274-w

Balaganapathi Devarakonda

引用次数: 0

Utility of Philosophy 哲学的效用

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00278-6

Javid Ahmad Mallah

{"title":"Utility of Philosophy","authors":"Javid Ahmad Mallah","doi":"10.1007/s40961-022-00278-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-022-00278-6","url":null,"abstract":"Philosophy is an incredible intellectual enterprise that promotes comprehensive exposure to creative and critical thinking. The paper is written to invite general people towards the philosophical studies and wisdom at the outset it promises an intellectual journey. The paper claims that the expansion of philosophical studies and thinking in contemporary times would be a task of huge magnitude. It mainly tries to explore the utility of philosophical studies and thinking in contemporary times. However, it is an attempt to bring philosophy into the public sphere and popularize it in the post-truth era. In this connection, the paper is engaged with some arguments reflecting why philosophical studies matter? Why it should go side by side with other sciences/disciplines? It is observed that philosophy, despite being a widely respected discipline in the world, is still absent in various parts of India, particularly in Jammu and Kashmir. In this region, philosophy received less attention because of certain misunderstandings. In this paper, however, an attempt has been made to clarify such misunderstandings and to highlight that isolating philosophy means depending on conservatism and remote learning. It argues that in the absence of philosophy our new generations may lack a moral compass, and the ability to think logically and critically.","PeriodicalId":41227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research","volume":"507 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138506836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Dharma as Principle of Self-denial and Emptiness 法是舍己空性的原则

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00277-7

Geo Lyong Lee

{"title":"Dharma as Principle of Self-denial and Emptiness","authors":"Geo Lyong Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40961-022-00277-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-022-00277-7","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to establish the meaning of Dharma as the principle of self-denial and emptiness. Dharma, a key concept in the religious thought of India, has the literal meaning of \"supporter.” Something that supports something else does not exist for itself. Just as the truth supporting the universe is Dharma, so the four pillars supporting the roof of the house to prevent it from collapsing are also Dharma. The four pillars supporting the house do not exist for themselves, but create an empty space in the house. In this respect, the essence of Dharma is self-denial, self-sacrifice. The traditional ascetic practices and religions in India is referred to as sanatana dharma (eternal truth), and the core is the complete extinction of I-ness (individual consciousness). When individual consciousness is completely lost, mokṣa (nirvana) is achieved. The moment the eternal truth is achieved, the individual consciousness becomes zero, and this position can be likened to the center (0) where the x- and y-axes meet in the coordinates of mathematics. Just as the center in the coordinates of mathematics is a place where the value of the x-axis is zero and the value of the y-axis is zero, the center of the universe, that is, nirvāṇa is achieved when individual consciousness is completely lost. Dharma is the path of becoming nothing to reach the zero point, and the process of self-denial is bound to entail pain. The pain involving voluntary self-denial can be rather a positive nourishment for the realization of Dharma. In fact, we can say that the core of the Hindu ethics of Aśrama-dharma (the 4 cycles of human life) and Varṇa-dharma (the caste system) is voluntary renunciation for the complete extinction of individual consciousness and renunciation concerning that which is possible.","PeriodicalId":41227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138543344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cultural Conflicts and Global Peace 文化冲突与全球和平

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00272-y

R. C. Sinha

引用次数: 0

Buddha and Wittgenstein on the Notion of Self 佛陀与维特根斯坦论自我的概念

IF 0.1

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI: 10.1007/s40961-022-00270-0

Maharana, Surya Kant

{"title":"Buddha and Wittgenstein on the Notion of Self","authors":"Maharana, Surya Kant","doi":"10.1007/s40961-022-00270-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40961-022-00270-0","url":null,"abstract":"The notion of Self plays a significant role in the philosophical speculations of Buddha and Wittgenstein. For the Buddha, ‘Self’ has empirical validity without ultimate reality. However, the Real Self is transcendent. It is the Absolute which is immanent as well as transcendent. It cannot therefore be bound to thought-constructions. The Absolute is Nirvāṇa; it is peaceful, immortal and unproduced which is unspeakable and can only be realised through immediate spiritual experience. To deal with Nirvāṇa rigourously, Buddha upholds a negative method of describing it as final. He prefers to subscribe to the philosophy of silence, for the bliss of Nirvāṇa is beyond empirical reality. Some striking affinities with such Buddhist notion of Self can be found in Wittgensteinian philosophy of Self. For Wittgenstein, the ‘Self’ comes into being through one’s own world. The Self or the metaphysical subject does not belong to the world; rather it is the limit of the world. The metaphysical Self is different from the empirical Self or ego with which psychology deals. The psychological self pertains to and explains the worldly state-of-affair. Besides, the philosophical Self or I is not the human being, the human body or the human soul with psychological properties, but the boundary (not a part) of the world. Self or I is not the name of a person. It therefore is inexplicable. Since it is unspeakable, we must be silent about it, for whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. Wittgenstein finally submits that this is all that really matters in human life. A comparative study of the two great philosophers suggests that the Buddhist philosophy of Self apparently echoes in the Wittgensteinian philosophy of Self.","PeriodicalId":41227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138533837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0