Research Handbook on Law and Courts最新文献_第2页

The use of precedent in US Supreme Court litigant briefs 美国最高法院诉讼摘要中先例的使用

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00015

Jessica A. Schoenherr, Ryan C. Black

引用次数: 3

Data infrastructure innovation in the field of law and courts: the European Court of Human Rights Database (ECHRdb) 法律和法院领域的数据基础设施创新:欧洲人权法院数据库

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00041

Elizabeth Chrun, R. Cichowski

引用次数: 8

Challenging authorities’ (in)action via amparos 通过宪法保护条款挑战当局的行动

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00016

L. Tiede, S. Achury

引用次数: 0

Understanding the determinants of opinion language borrowing in state courts in the United States 了解美国州法院意见语言借用的决定因素

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00028

J. Bowie, Elisha C. Savchak

引用次数: 2

Comparing the influence of war on high courts of the USA, UK, and Canada 比较战争对美国、英国和加拿大高等法院的影响

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00009

Susanne Schorpp

引用次数: 0

Implicit and explicit boundaries of belonging: indigenous and minority identities 归属的隐性和显性界限:土著和少数民族身份

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00036

Kati Nieminen

引用次数: 0

“Text as data” in law and courts: data coding, language clarity, and data sharing 法律和法院中的“文本即数据”:数据编码、语言清晰度和数据共享

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00042

Justin Wedeking

引用次数: 0

Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law and Courts 《法律与法院研究手册》导言

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00005

S. Sterett, L. Walker

{"title":"Introduction to the Research Handbook on Law and Courts","authors":"S. Sterett, L. Walker","doi":"10.4337/9781788113205.00005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113205.00005","url":null,"abstract":"Before the worldwide spread of politics and governance through courts, scholars circulated a story about courts: they could hold central governments accountable (Easton, 1953). Since then, widespread judicialization of politics around the world has animated political reform and scholarly debate (Michel and Sikkink, 2013). The debate over when and whether courts hold central and local governments accountable keeps alive the idea that courts hold the powerful to account, serving the rule of law. Many studies of variation in courts and law take this idea as a background theoretical framework.2 That purpose of courts then sets two problems as central. First, if courts hold other powerful institutions to account, it is unclear why these institutions would allow lawsuits. The question is particularly puzzling in authoritarian regimes (Ginsburg and Moustafa, 2008; Moustafa, 2004). Attacks on courts mark authoritarianism even outside authoritarian states. The mirror problem in liberal democracies is that of understanding when and where courts hold actors to account in a way that counters what majorities seem to want. Studies of what high courts do often demonstrate how they thread this needle. Courts often rule in favor of central governments on key political issues, and in favor of more advantaged people in many others. In cases where courts would seem especially valuable for holding governments accountable—when executives claim sole authority to fight terror, conduct war, exclude asylum seekers, or manage need in emergencies—courts are often very likely to defer, or lose jurisdiction or budget or operating expenses. Alternatively, they may craft decisions that hold powerful institutions to account while allowing officials considerable discretion. If they do not hold powerful institutions to account, the fear in a liberal democracy is that courts might primarily serve the powerful’s purposes of","PeriodicalId":411025,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Law and Courts","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131709467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

All your data will be held against you: secondary use of data from personal genomics and wearable tech 你所有的数据都将被用来对付你:来自个人基因组学和可穿戴技术的数据的二次使用

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00040

A. Phillips

引用次数: 3

When do the losers win? Appellate court reversals of civil jury verdicts 失败者什么时候会赢?上诉法院撤销民事陪审团的判决

Research Handbook on Law and Courts Pub Date : 2019-10-08 DOI: 10.4337/9781788113205.00031

Tao L. Dumas

引用次数: 0